mr. o'connor referred to, i don't think it's consistently answered but there has been an available phone line so the complaint from the neighbors that there hasn't been one i don't think is completely legitimate, it's just that it's not answered on a regular basis or at times so they felt like there wasn't one available. i don't want to mince words or whatever, so if your amendment is related to an additional line or a different one, then just i want to be clear about that. >> the input that we get from the neighbors is that the line is being -- i mean, they acknowledge there is a line though, correct? >> yes. >> some did and some didn't. >> yeah, see, i kind of like the ones are saying they didn't, if they already send us something now, it's on record, that they reached out to these people that did send something to say there was a line, this is what the procedure is and they acknowledged that. >> so, just -- bhas your friendly amendment again? >> it's just to reiterate if they can go through and make sure that these neighbors who are coming to us that want to fix the situation, that th

mr. o'connor and mr. jenkins and the fees were still outstanding. on july 25, july 27 and july 28, there was noise complaints to the entertainment commission by the neighbors about brick and mortar. >> can you please repeat those dates. >> july 25, july 27, and july 28th. on july 31, there was a second check received from brick and mortar to cover the citations for the returned check fees which did not bounce. that brings us to august 3 where sound inspections were made by both the entertainment commission and the department of public health to take sound measurements at brick and mortar. on august 3, that same day, there were no noise complaints filed by neighbors and august 4, the next day. so, that's just what we have before us, but it looks like we have the permit holder here to make their case, so -- >> okay. i'm here to request that the closing limits be lifted or the closing time limits. we have done quite a bit of sound reinforcement, i have worked very closely with the neighbor, have been in fairly consistent contact with them, i was not aw

mr. o'connor. and he's been very proactive in making sure that the sound is contained once i complained. so i am a little worried about raising the decibel to 95. but i am definitely willing to experiment and work with them personally. and come up with something that works for both sides. >> great, thank you. any other public comment on this item? seeing none. [gavel] public comment is closed. i am willing to entertain a motion. i think it appears that our applicants have met some of what we requested. just to provide proof of the sound proofing and a phone number and it's great that we have the public comment that says that relations are improving. where do you want to take this, commissioners? >> i want to ask a question before we go there. through the chair, what is their db now, 80? 85? >> the current conditions are 80 db and 11:30 and 12:30 for weekdays and week nights. and there is a request to go 12:30 and 1, weekday and week nights. and as far as db's, inspector edwards report indicates up