mr. o'reilly.i could respond, i would like to give encouragement and courage to the flock, so to speak, and the leadership of the christian community. i think what you are doing by asking rhetorical questions is very wise and shrewd. for example, on the issue of tolerance should the local muslim owner of the newspaper be forced to publish charlie hebdo car cartoons. should the catholic grocer be forced to show bread and wine for those who want to use mock youkist in the name of tolerance should these be required people of faith and people who have sincere convictions? it seems to me that forcing people to violate their conscience is more tyranny than it is of tolerance and perhaps we should call it that. it's almost like we are saying i cannot tolerate your intolerance and i hate you hateful people. it's like a dog chasing its tail. i get dizzy listening to this fallacious reasoning. i think the christian community should have confidence in calling people out with rhetorical question that lead to t

mr. o'reilly, good luck getting our spineless leadership to defend christianity.california. i do speak out, but i do not fight using condemnation or con desengs, jesus would not. the nazarene was confrontation at times, pastor. he wasn't afraid. by the way the movie "killing jesus" where you'll see jesus being confrontation will be shown here on the fox news channel friday evening at good friday, and again on eastern sunday atd 8:00 p.m. eastern time. bloomington, illinois. o'reilly, you eloquently said what many of us are thinking about the lack of trust we have in president obama. has absolutely nothing to do with the color of his skin. david monroe michigan. bill, you said martin luther king jr. was a liberal christian. actually, he was a republican. there's no evidence of that, dave. none. dave, new orleans. mr. o, to borrow from george c. scott who portrayed general patton in the movie o'reilly, you magnificent -- i read your book. great job. that was george c. scott as patton talking about ramel who we feature in "killing patton." thanks for reading the book

mr. o'reilly you are not fair and balanced on the marijuana issue.story on the millions of children that are growing up without fathers because they're locked up for marijuana. it's a myth, brenda. total myth. dope dealers are locked up not dope smokers. with only a few exceptions. and for my money, kids are better off without a drug-pusher father. they're better off. gloria caruso buffalo, new york. i have been trying to find out what happened to bob beckel. he had back surgery gloria. o'reilly o'reilly will "killing patton" be out in paper back. go to bill o'reilly.com and register. i could even do it. and then you get a free book. killing patton and other killing books. not going to be out in paper back because they continue to sell in hard back. patton has been on the best-seller list for 30 consecutive weeks. amazing. dan buckner of california. i missed the last about wild bill hickock. will i get another chance to see it? this sunday kit carson featured on legends and lies at 8:00 p.m. dan. but right after that they run again at 9:00. ratings o

mr. o'reilly laid out that here are the facts and they are not disputed.ated to the clinton foundation. hillary clinton admits that she lobbied the algerian government on behalf of general electric and algeria did, indeed, award a 1.9 billion-dollar contract to general electric after a the fact. so so, after i laid out those facts i said since we cannot get blood from a stone, and the stone being hillary clinton's server in this instance, would you general electric, would you release the documents? would you release the communications that you have with the state department during this time to prove to us investors here that nothing untoward happened? and that's the approach that we are coming from. we are a good governance organization. we are concerned that general electric may have exposed itself here to honest services fraud completely unnecessarily. >> right. and so you did this in the shareholder meeting. stand up and raise your hand and immelt was on the stage. what was the response? >> his exact words were what i ask are you going to release the do

mr. o'reilly, any responsible thee lsh will tell you homo sexuality, is not a sin.se. i didn't say that. behavior is one thing. being something is something else. david whitly bill, help that pizza shop. these people do not deserve to be attacked. agreed. glenn beck has set up a fund for the store owners. you might want to check that out. bill, i think you're wrong about gay kids being brutalized. it is now cool to be gay in some places but some have suffered because of their situation. michael cox cheyenne wyoming. you're right about protecting homosexuals from harm. why not use "the factor" to educate people about the catholic church's stance. because we're not in the business to promote any religion. catholic leaders should be doing that. should is keyword. sarasota, florida. i believe if a business is open to the public you should serve everyone regardless of lifestyle. my initial reaction to "killing jesus" was critical, but i've changed my mind. the way you portrayed the life of jesus is powerful and deserves to be venerated. california, my uncle vito was kill

mr. o'reilly from your selective perspective of the baltimore riots, you're correct.rship should help in correcting the situation. but from an enterprise perspective, we must fix this societal problem. it's not going to happen maurice. never has happened in all of our history. if you watched tonight, you saw me ask miss rice is there one country who's eliminated poverty through programs? the answer is no. harlem in new york city proves opportunity comes to people and places that respect the marketplace. burning things down is anarchy. investors and entrepreneurs avoid anarchy. it's not african-american leadership that must act. it's black americans themselves through peer pressure. another, nashville, tennessee, thugs will never respect cops. my wife was born in harlem and worked her way to a successful life. key word worked. keep in mind police officers do have a responsibility to use restraint even on the worst offend offenders. cathie long valley new jersey i was planning to visit baltimore's beautiful inner harbor with my children this summer. no more. cecile las

mr. o'reilly maybe since you've had a lot to say with this. have you all among the five of you tried to find commonality here we could work? >> so let me suggest an answer also to senator sullivan's question. the commission is a creature of congress. anytime congress can speak, i think it's helpful for my purposes. so whatever you're able to agree in terms of legislation, i think that's helpful. i don't know the particulars. but i leave it to your capable hands to whether you can get legislation and the best outcome in terms of policy decisions. >> when you look at the gdp, i looked at china at 9 trillion. russia is at 2 trillion. great britain's at 2 trillion. we're at 17 plus trillion. so we've done something right in spite of ourself. and we want to make sure that we can continue to grow and the internet's been a big part of that gdp. you've got to give us direction here. if you find can't find some areas of agreement or consensus, and right now i see you split 3-2, pretty evenly split. i think you're probably all good friends. you all talk

mr. o, to borrow from george c. scott who portrayed general patton in the movie o'reilly, you magnificent -- i read your book. great job. that was george c. scott as patton talking about ramel who we feature in "killing patton." thanks for reading the book. i appreciate it. finally tonight, "the factor" tip of the day. april national child abuse prevention month. i don't have to give you the stats. we all know child abuse is perhaps the worst domestic problem we have in america. much driven by drugs and alcohol abuse. and the kids involved suffer forever. never goes away. now there's a national child abuse hot line. you should write this number down in case you see anything anywhere at any time.

mr. chairman, you're avoiding saying the word no -- >> because with due respect, sir -- and the o'reilly rule never disagree with me -- >> my question simply was the public able to read the order and comment on it before it was entered. the answer is no, correct? >> that's not the way the process works. >> i did not ask the way the process worked. i asked was the public able to read and comment on it before it was entered? that's either a yes or no, you could go and read it before it came into affect, or no, you could not. >> the public never reads orders, sir. so the answer to that is -- >> the answer is no. i would note that just a few weeks ago president obama's executive amnesty was enjoined by a federal court for violation of notice and comment. and i think the commission's action represents an abuse of its authority. let's shift though to the effect of this order. treating broadband providers as common carriers, putting them under title 2, treating them as public utilities subjects them to section 201. section 201 gives the commission the authority, according to section 201, all ch

o'reilly. >>> breaking tonight a big story involving hillary clinton and a powerful businessman funding millions of donations to her family foundation while possibly violating the u.s. sanctions on iran sanctions mrs. clinton was supposed to enforce. welcome to the kelly file everyone i'm megyn kelly. there's serious questions involving hillary clinton and the man seen here. victor pinchuk. the owner of a massive pipeline country and a man who gave more to the clinton family foundation than any other individual. a record released by "newsweek" saying his company may have violated sanctions on iran. done business with iran by delivering nearly $2 million worth of steel pipes to iran for pipelines. that's a no-no. hillary clinton was secretary of state at that time and happened to be the person charged withholding foreign entities responsible for violating u.s. sangs on iran. during that same time between 2009 and 2013 the clip ton foundation received at least $8.6 million from the victor pinchu pinchuk foundation and pinchuk pledged more than 20 million more and has not been charged with violating u.s. sanctions on iran. we have a big lineup tonight on this. pow howie kurtz is here. and trace, we h

o'reilly. >>> breaking tonight a big story involving hillary clinton and a powerful businessman funding millions of donations to her family foundation while possibly violating the u.s. sanctions on iran sanctions mrss supposed to enforce. welcome to the kelly file everyone i'm megyn kelly. there's serious questions involving hillary clinton and the man seen here. victor pinchuk. the owner of a massive pipeline country and a man who gave more to the cli

o'reilly. thanks for watching us tonight. trusting president obama on iran. that is the subject of this evening's talking points memo. many americans and many members of congress do not trust mrama on anything. recent quinnipiac poll asks who do you trust more to make decisions? president obama or republicans in congress? 42% say the president. 47% the republicans. but in that poll just 4% of self-described republicans trust barack obama. more than their own party. just 4%. that's because the president has not done much to persuade non-liberal americans that his policies are good for them. also american foreign policy is a make. president obama has made mistakes in the middle east. no putin and seems confused in the world. vital situation stopping iran from developing nuclear weapons, the president finds himself with little credibility. therefore, when he says the deal is good many americans, perhaps most, simply don't believe him enter congress who next week will debate a bill that would require president obama to submit any nuke treat were with iran to the senate and house for approval. that seems to be logical because then, all the strengths and weaknesses of the deal woul

mr. carlson. you're a journalist with integrity and i hope you have -- i hope you do not pull a bill o'reilly or brian williams anytime soon. my question is about ronald reagan. generally considered to be against a government but when you look at his record, it did not always turn out that way. there are no real programs that i think that he cut. when he left office, the budget deficit -- the national debt was three times higher than it was when he came into office which is about similar to obama's record. what you think about this on the myth of reagan trying to downsize the government? guest: i think there's a lot of truth in what you said. i have seen all kinds of numbers on this question. numbers are famously fungible. i don't think there was a massive net reduction of government for sure under the reagan administration. i am not giving them a pass on this. it is pretty hard to cut anything. if you attempt even to rein in the growth of spending -- the slashing the budget and making elderly widows eat cat food, and just the dramatic, over the top language of any attempt to rein in spending are almo

mr. carlson. you're a journalist with integrity and i hope you have -- i hope you do not pull of bill o'reilly orrian williams anytime soon. my question is about ronald reagan. generally considered to be against a government but when you look at his record, it did not always turn out that way. there are no real programs that i think that he cut. when he left office, the budget deficit -- the national debt was three times higher than it was when he came into office which is about similar to obama's record. what you think about this on the myth of reagan trying to downsize the government? guest: i think there's a lot of truth in what you said. i have seen all kinds of numbers on this question. numbers are famously fungible. gdeable. i am not giving them a pass on this. it is pretty hard to cut anything. if you attempt even to rein in the growth of spending -- the dramatic, over the top language of any attempt to rein in spending are almost unbelievable. this may be the core problem of democracy. once you have -- once the majority figures out it can take from the minority legally, it is hard to keep

mr. chairman, i yield back. >> senator rubio. >> thank you. thank you senator for yielding your place so that i could make it for my next appointment. commissioner o'reilly want to begin with you. use of wireless broadband and internet connected devices has provided all sorts of economic growth and innovation that was previously, quite frankly, unimaginable. wireless traffic as we all know is projected to grow exponentially in the years ahead. because of this i introduced legislation to free up additional spectrum for commercial use, both lie sensed and unlicensed. i strongly believe that we should be enacting policies that ensure that the united states continues to lead the world in wireless innovation and technology. unfortunately, it's my personal opinion -- i think those of others -- that the fcc net neutrality order is quite frankly the opposite of what we should be doing. i would be interested to hear you talk a little bit about the impact the order is going to have on wireless and wireless consumers who are interested in this topic and may not understand its true impacts on them. >> absolutely. thank you for your leadership on wireless issues. i w