mr. o'riley.orted on this story earlier this week that's what they told us too. >>> we contacted the fox news channel again to ask if they would give us any comment on the substance of these allegations in what was a very unexpected and sort of amusing development, they didn't -- we asked them for comment on the substance of the allegations. what they sent us was a lot of information about how great bill o' o'riley's ratings are. i have seen your ratingings shoot my ratings in the head well in pictures anyway. fox was asked for comment and fox said i completely misrepresented their communication with this program. for the record what i said on wednesday night is quite literally true. we asked for a comment on the substance of these allegations about mr. o'riley. they sent us a previous statement defending bill o'riley. they sent us contact information for his book publishers which is nice, but we asked for a fox news comment, and links to other people's articles about bill o' o'riley. they gave us

mr. o'riley's claim to be near someone at the jfk assassination.arently false claims as recently as this past november. he has made apparently false claims can as recently as this past november. instead of correcting, apologizing, or publicly addressing the issues raised about whether their star anchor has misrepeatedly misrepresented his own role in news stories, the initial instinct there has been to stand by him while he he attacked reporters covering the story. he has literally threatened reporters. even though fox employs reporters themselves. and probably do not take kindly to this. now they have moved on to strategy round two. their new strategy for trying to paper over this, with the highest profile guy in this whole part of our national media, their new strategy is essentially to say who cares? he has great ratings. when the media watchdog eye media ethics.org asked about the growing list of allegations made, this is what they got back. when asked for comment on the latest series of questions about o'reilly that his ratings have gone up. t

go no alphabetical aerd of that with commissioner clie bourn, o'riley and commissioner pai and commissioner rosen wore sell. >> thank you, mr. chairman. it's a privilege to be here with my colleagues. we're five type a individuals who have been working together for the public interest. let me make three quick observations in keeping with your three-minute rule. one the open internet decision, as you indicated is a watershed. your leadership, mr. chairman, has illustrated that there really aren't any differences about this need to do something, as you said today. we need clear rules. there are different approaches to be sure. >> wireless is causing cancer and the fcc has been hiding it from everyone. suffering with brain injuries, breast cancer. >> you're subject to arrest! >> cancer. world health organizations classify -- >> real estate main order in the hearing room. >> world health organizations classify all of the wireless as the class 2 b cancer again. these aren't safety standards. >> sorry mr. chairman. please proceed. >> thank you, mr. chairman. as i said, there are different approaches that we take to be sure and no