63
63
Jun 19, 2014
06/14
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 63
favorite 0
quote 0
mr. oakley specifically says he's reluctant to push hard on safety issues. >> i'm sorry. >> you put in your report where mr. oakley specifically says on page 93 he was reluctant to push hard on safety issues because of his perception his pred sors pushed out of a job. that implies he withheld safety information. is he still working for you? >> yes, he is. and actually, he's raised issues and we are actively investigating. it's part of our speak up for safety program. >> sound like he decided not to speak up. >> he is now and we're taking it very seriously. >> i just find it hard to believe that a 210,000 employees, not a single one in that company had the integrity to say, i think we're making a mistake here. not a single one. that's puzzling to me. the v.a. had a lot of whistle blowers. i don't see in gm there's whistle blowers. not a single person you interviewed in this? let me jump to another question. i want to get back to this. there was also a lot of issues about lawsuits. you referenced some of those. what i don't see is questions if you examine if gm responded appropriately to vict
mr. oakley specifically says he's reluctant to push hard on safety issues. >> i'm sorry. >> you put in your report where mr. oakley specifically says on page 93 he was reluctant to push hard on safety issues because of his perception his pred sors pushed out of a job. that implies he withheld safety information. is he still working for you? >> yes, he is. and actually, he's raised issues and we are actively investigating. it's part of our speak up for safety program. >>...
142
142
Jun 18, 2014
06/14
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 142
favorite 0
quote 0
mr. oakley specifically says he's reluctant to push hard on safety issues. >> i'm sorry? >> you put in your report where mr. oakley specifically says on page 93, he was reluctant to push hard on safety issues because of his perception that his predecessor had been pushed out of a job. that implies he withheld safety information. first of all, ms. barra, is he still working for you? >> yes, he is. and, actually, he's raised issues and we are actively investigating. it's part of our speak up for safety program. >> it sounds like he decided not to speak up. >> well, he is now. and we're taking it very seriously. >> i just find it hard to believe that of 210,000 employees, not a single one in that company had the integrity to say, i think we're making a mistake here. not a single one. that's puzzling to me. i mean, even out of the v.a. hospital we have lots of whistle blowers. i don't see here in gm that there's whistle blowers. not a single person you interviewed in this? let me jump to another question. i want to get back to this. because there was also a lot of issues abou
mr. oakley specifically says he's reluctant to push hard on safety issues. >> i'm sorry? >> you put in your report where mr. oakley specifically says on page 93, he was reluctant to push hard on safety issues because of his perception that his predecessor had been pushed out of a job. that implies he withheld safety information. first of all, ms. barra, is he still working for you? >> yes, he is. and, actually, he's raised issues and we are actively investigating. it's part of...
74
74
Jun 20, 2014
06/14
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 74
favorite 0
quote 0
mr. oakley specifically says he's reluctant to push hard on safety issues. >> i'm sorry.h >> you put in your report where mr. oakley specifically says on page 93, he was reluctant to push hard on safety issues because of his perception his predecessors pushed out of a ad job. bout that implies he withheld safety information. first of all, ms. bare ras, is s he still working for you? >> yes, he is.iand, act and actually, he's raised issues and we are actively investigating. it's part of our speak up for >> safety program. >> it sounds like he decided not to speak up.yse >> he is now and we're taking it very seriously. >> i just find it hard to s, not believe that of 210,000 o employees, not a single one in that company had the integrity c to say, i think we're making a mistake here.om not a single one. that's puzzling to me. even out of the va hospital we v have lots of whistleblowers. i don't see here in gm there's s whistleblowers.to ano not a single person you i wa interviewed in this?nt let me jump to another question. i want to get back to this.s alo there was also a lot of issues about
mr. oakley specifically says he's reluctant to push hard on safety issues. >> i'm sorry.h >> you put in your report where mr. oakley specifically says on page 93, he was reluctant to push hard on safety issues because of his perception his predecessors pushed out of a ad job. bout that implies he withheld safety information. first of all, ms. bare ras, is s he still working for you? >> yes, he is.iand, act and actually, he's raised issues and we are actively investigating....
307
307
Jun 22, 2014
06/14
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 307
favorite 0
quote 0
mr. oakley said he is reluctant to push hard on safety issues because of his perception his predecessor was pushed out of a job. that implies he withheld safety information. is he still working for you? >> yes. he has raised issues, and we are actively investigating. >> sounds like he decided not to speak up. >> he is now, and we are taking it very seriously. >> i find it hard to believe that out of 210,000 employees, not a single one in that company had the integrity to say, i think we are making a mistake here. that is puzzling to me. even out of the va hospital we have lots of whistleblowers. i don't see that here in gm there are whistleblowers. let me jump to another question. also a lot of issues about lawsuits. what i don't see here is questions if you examine if you examine it gm responded appropriately to victims' discovery requests. i don't know if you spoke with plaintiffs attorneys in the case, but did you find that requested information of gm was responded to in a timely manner at the plaintiff's attorneys request and he information they presented to gm was responded to? very be
mr. oakley said he is reluctant to push hard on safety issues because of his perception his predecessor was pushed out of a job. that implies he withheld safety information. is he still working for you? >> yes. he has raised issues, and we are actively investigating. >> sounds like he decided not to speak up. >> he is now, and we are taking it very seriously. >> i find it hard to believe that out of 210,000 employees, not a single one in that company had the integrity to...