mr. parkinson did that on purpose? >> well, mr. son says he can only defend himself by explaining this relationship. but it certainly muddies the water here. it raises the question as to whether mr. sanni was motivated by feelings other than his professed horror at what the vote leave campaign in his opinion did. i mean, it is interesting that mr. sanni and two other whistle blower whose have also come forward last week and given evidence to the electoral commission are all still supporters of britain leaving the european union. >> yeah, and he explains that in the interview that we did, the part of the interview we just showed. he says he doesn't, he still thinks the rules need to be followed, and they weren't in this particular instance. can any of this have an impact on the actual result of the referendum? >> i don't think so. there's no way in which the electoral commission, which governs elections in this country can overturn the results on the basis of this. all they can do, really, is fine vote leave. >> are they going to inv

stephen parkinson, now the prime minister's official secretary, has denied the claims but in a statement he also revealed that he had been in a relationship with a whistleblower behind them. mris mother as a result. how is it remotely a cce pta ble result. how is it remotely acceptable that when a young whistleblower exposes compelling evidence of lawbreaking by the leave campaign intimating —— implicating staff at number ten that one of those names, instead of addressing the allegations, releases and officially sanctioned statement out in the whistleblower as gay and putting his family in pakistan in danger. it's a disgrace prime minister. theresa may told him any statement issued were personal ones. iof statement issued were personal ones. i of course recognise the importance of ensuring that we do recognise that the sum, being touted as gay is difficult because of their family and circumstances. what i want to see is a world where everybody is able to be confident in their sexuality and doesn't have to worry about such things. that answer didn't satisfy another labour mp. prime minister given that your political secretary stephen parkinson was the person responsible for o

mr speaker. given that your political secretary stephen parkinson was the person that‘s responsible for outing votesupport on the issue of russia. does she agree that all member states and indeed the uk should be vigilant against human rights abuses wherever they occur, even when that is within an eu member state itself? can i say to the honourable lady that of course, will in the european union, we all stand up for certain values, european values. human rights are within those values that we stand up for and where any difference is shown by any individual country in relation to that then that is something that is pointed out. thank you, mr speaker. does the prime minister share my incredulity at the crocodile tears of the snp over fishing when they would have us remain in the disastrous cfp in the first place? can i go on to ask her about the question last week from my honourable friend from berwick about mitigation scheme to protect our fishermen during the transition period? has any thought been given to that in government and might we see something about it in the forthcoming fisheries bill? ca