mr. patel to genuinely engage those who might be approximate to his venture. mr. patel seems to have a track record of needing to be faced with censure before addressing substantive complaints regarding the properties that he owns. the on-site construction methodology in repairing this facility subsequent to the 2006 fire has been in the eyes of this construction professional substandard. for example, i stopped someone who appeared to be managing the project from dumping four to five cubic yards of construction debris on shipley and thelma street. a notice of violation was issued for failing to mitigate airborne dust during the post-fire demolition. and i have observed a host of sidewalk permit violations during the construction process that my construction company would not be a party to. it is because of these reasons and those enumerated in the d.r. that i believe it is crucially important that this project have attached the conditions of approval listed in this d.r. filing before it is appr

which mr. patel doesn't take responsibility. so to guarantee that hotel is run safely and properly, i believe the approval of the project should be contingent on satisfying the conditions of approval outlined in the d.r. filing. thank you. president miguel: thank you. are there additional speakers in favor of the discretionary review applicant? if not, project sponsor. >> good evening, president miguel, commissioners, eileen dick for lebron and martell on behalf of the hotel -- vicas hotel and sam patel. i want to start because i know our paper has very much responded to the concerns that the d.r. requesters and the neighbors have raised. i want to make very clear at the outset that we proposed the conditions that the d.r. requester has included in his packet. at least mr. solas' packet. he added another page of conditions but we were willing to engage in all the conditions we provided to you in our papers and we had worked on those at a larger building and smaller building where we came up with them. there was always an underst

my husband and i need this decision to pursue civil legal action against mr. patel. he initially built this without a permit to. the work was stopped and he was given the opportunity to apply for a variance after the construction but he chose to falsify his 311, hiding his intentions and robbing us of due process. he took advantage of the planning department oversight. he took an advantage of the mistakes of a 20-rolled document which stated he did not have to notify his never said he was raising his roof. he knew all along that he was doing the wrong thing. he used his connections with the building inspection department to further his intentions. mr. rough trail took a blind eye to his overextension. even to this day, he is helping him to avoid compliance. the description of the initial three love and stated that the building which go no further than 66 feet when in fact it went up 75 feet. as you can see from this is where the deck ends. this is 66 feet. this is the current photo of his building and it extends out to 75 feet. it was stated that it should not extend

patel who secretary of the bow group a center right thing tank in london and thanks for joining us mr patel firstly britain and russia continue to agree to disagree on belligerent yankel case we seem to have lost brian there very sorry for that hopefully we will join him later and will of course have you more more about rather on our website for you we're going to move on for now nearly one in eight british households has no one in work according to a study that ranks u.k. as the worst among the biggest e.u. countries part of the blame is being put on a welfare system that means the unemployed can be better off on benefits but as our laurie amid reports even though the government wants to force people off welfare and onto work the jobs aren't just there. once the seat of an empire now the holder of an unwanted unemployment accolade new figures reveal the u.k. has the highest number of households in any of the e.u. these largest economies in which no one works it amounts to over eleven percent of homes long term unemployment is growing as a proportion of total unemployment but a bigger probl