both the city and mr. patel agreed to be bound. it specifically said it has nothing to do with the zone or the planning code and the court of appeals said their decision has nothing to do with the zoning and planning code. also, the courts of appeal have routinely stated that the invocation does not give the property owner are right to do it yourself zoning. ok? they cannot invoke it and not complied with zoning provisions that uniformly applied to this property and other properties in the neighborhood and get some other the subsequent use of the property other than residential housing, residential rental housing, excuse me. they do not get a right to surpass the planning code provisions that generally applied to the neighborhood. every single court of appeal decision has confirmed that. it is and the statute itself. all this appeal is about is whether the zoning administrator determination must correct. and it clearly was because under standard nonconforming law, it is up to the property owner to show evidence of the nonconforming