mr. paulson? it's been moved mr. harrington a second? it's been move and seconded.ll vote place. [roll call vote] you have five ayes. >> clerk: item rec and park, approve and authorize general manager to execute the amended and restated memorandum of understanding regarding operation and maintenance of the san francisco water supply systems between the san francisco p.u.c. and the san francisco fire department with sffd for $126,000 per year to help fund an employee. this action constitutes approval action of the project for purpose of ceqa. >> basically, fire department uses water from the domestic water supply system and the emergency fire fighting water system. these systems are operated to maintained by the sfpuc. efws is a high pressure water system that's constructed between 1908 and 1913 and owned and operated and maintained by the san francisco fire department until 2010. on may 17, 2010, city's mayor transferred jurisdiction from the fire department to the sfpuc. on may 26, 2016, commission authorized the sfpuc to enter m.o.u. with the fire department. it d

mr. paulson, this is a catastrophic collapse.ding disappeared in a cloud of dust in seconds overnight two nights ago. how can this happen, i think is a very basic question. and what level of inspections takes place in buildings like this? a building not particularly old, 40 years old. are these buildings that are regularly inspected? is there any history of this there? is there any danger known in the ground? we heard a researcher talking about subsidence there, a sinking of the ground. was there any warning is the basic question. >> the answer is no, none that i've seen. a 40-year-old building like that is not very old. you know, but they do have a law here in florida where every 40 years, a building has to be inspected, as you heard, for electrical, plumbing, integrity. they were in the process of doing that. we haven't seen the report yet, so we'll see what that report says. i don't think anybody could have predicted something as catastrophic as this could have happened. generally you get some type of warning ahead of time tha

paulson. and the point i want to make -- the speaker pro tempore: if the gentleman will excuse himself for a minute. without objection. mr barr: thank you, madam speaker. and the point that the former acting comptroller was making here is that disapproving the o.c.c.'s true lender rule will contrain future comptrollers' ability and limit the o.c.c. ability to make supervisory or enforcement actions against banks that would have been deemed to have made the loan under the true lender rule. meaning, the way the c.r.a. law operates, if the house passes this resolution, we will have a permanent problem in the credit markets that will deprive low and moderate-income americans of the financial products that they desperately need. and that's why i urge all my colleagues to reject this misguided proposal. and i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from north carolina reserves. ms. waters: i now yield one minute to -- the speaker pro tempore: the gentlewoman from california will be recognized. ms. waters: i now yield one minute to the gentlewoman from california, ms. porter. the speaker pro tempore: the gentlewoman