mr. paxton himself filed, the memorandum which is exhibit a to mr. paxton's request doesn't validate the allegations made in the report. it's simply affirming and noticing that a report and a complaint was filed with the rent board by mr. paxton. that information was known to the board on april 25th when this matter was decided. mr. paxton testified to the fact that he had filed a report of alleged wrongful severance with the rent board. that was before the board. the fact he did acknowledge receipt of that information is not new information that would affect the outcome of the hearing. secondly, mr. paxton continues to take the position that the relocation of housing services that we proposed are not like kind and that they do constitute a severance of some of his housing services. that was discussed at both hearings before the board. it was discussed before the board that mr. paxton does have a remedy at the rent board if he believes that to be the case that he can file a petition to have his rent adjusted accordingly. not new information. that was

mr. paxton? what is the significance of that?e an elected official you shouldn't be treated any better or worse. the reason you have procedures and policies to make sure it never happens. it protects the fbi and gives him credibility. if you step out of the procedure to treat them better or worse, you reduce our credibility as a law enforcement agency. stuart: but the key question is whether or not he did it for political reasons. did he do it to support hillary clinton and cover up for her, isn't it? >> hard to know somebody's intentions but when you go outside of your procedures especially in a case like this, it does create the question since he is only one that can answer that, people will wonder whether he helped hillary clinton. stuart: still questioning. doesn't carry that much further, doesn't it? >> no, unfor the that that he did this, because now we have questions. he is only one we can know why he did it. we'll all wonder and why he did it for political reasons. stuart: we haven't read the report. it came out to the ge