58
58
Mar 12, 2016
03/16
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 58
favorite 0
quote 0
mr. pearlman: there is a private-sector story to be told there. in the early 30's of late 20's, there's a rise of an identifiable tax court. is a meaningful community of tax lawyers that starts developing in the 20's and 30's. mcgill is a leader in that. and there's also a recognition that lawyers and economists need to find a way to work together efficiently. and so one of the more illuminating comments i've ever heard on this topic came from an economist who worked in the treasury department in the same years. he told me that the greatest regret he ever had was not going to law school. he seriously considered it, even while serving in the treasury department, he considered doing a night law school degree. they could see even then that the crucial decisions were going to be made by lawyers and accountants together. i do think there's a whole literature there among historians on professional expertise. this community of experts that grows up in the 30's and really sort of takes off into the 40's and 50's are this unusual blend of economists, lawye
mr. pearlman: there is a private-sector story to be told there. in the early 30's of late 20's, there's a rise of an identifiable tax court. is a meaningful community of tax lawyers that starts developing in the 20's and 30's. mcgill is a leader in that. and there's also a recognition that lawyers and economists need to find a way to work together efficiently. and so one of the more illuminating comments i've ever heard on this topic came from an economist who worked in the treasury department...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
58
58
Mar 2, 2016
03/16
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 58
favorite 0
quote 0
mr. cranshaw commissioner johnck commissioner johns commissioner matsuda commissioner pearlman commissionernd and commissioner president wolfram. >> so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero and places us under our consent calendar all matters listed hereunder constitute a consent calendar, are considered to be routine and may be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the commission. there will be no separate discussion of these items there will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of the commission, the public, or staff so requests in which event the matter shall be removed from the consent calendar and considered as a separate item at this or a future hearing. item 7 for case at 101 townsend a certificate of preference holder certificate of appropriateness any commission wish to take it off consent. >> no, it is a great use. >> is there anyone from the public that wishes to speak request this be taken off the consent calendar zero pu opportunities for public comment seeing and hearing none public comment is closed. and precede to the item. >>
mr. cranshaw commissioner johnck commissioner johns commissioner matsuda commissioner pearlman commissionernd and commissioner president wolfram. >> so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero and places us under our consent calendar all matters listed hereunder constitute a consent calendar, are considered to be routine and may be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the commission. there will be no separate discussion of these items there will be no separate...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
79
79
Mar 20, 2016
03/16
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 79
favorite 0
quote 0
pearlman --. >> commissioner johns. >> yeah, you are. >> i department to follow up with mr. frye about the question could this be -- is there a district potential in this area that this would be part of so it might be part of a bigger district? or i know that in like west soma on the alley streets they're the small residential buildings there that got noted in the contact statement, and therefore are historic resources and have some level of protection. if it could be the same kind of thing and this already has some level of protection because of inner mission context. >> that's correct commissioner. for the purposes of ceqa this is a category a district so it does have protection for the purposes of seek eek however not all of the prosections in article 10 designation would provide, but to your point we do think while we haven't thoroughly studied it and because we specifically looked at the development patterns here as being the boundary justification for the development of the woodward gardens area and this cluster of romeo flats there was certainly a lot of rebuilding ha
pearlman --. >> commissioner johns. >> yeah, you are. >> i department to follow up with mr. frye about the question could this be -- is there a district potential in this area that this would be part of so it might be part of a bigger district? or i know that in like west soma on the alley streets they're the small residential buildings there that got noted in the contact statement, and therefore are historic resources and have some level of protection. if it could be the same...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
41
41
Mar 26, 2016
03/16
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 41
favorite 0
quote 0
pearlman --. >> commissioner johns. >> yeah, you are. >> i department to follow up with mr.ld this be -- is there a district potential in this area that this would be part of so it might be part of a bigger district? or i know that in like west soma on the alley streets they're the small residential buildings there that got noted in the contact statement, and therefore are historic resources and have some level of protection. if it could be the same kind of thing and this already has some level of protection because of inner mission context. >> that's correct commissioner. for the purposes of ceqa this is a category a district so it does have protection for the purposes of seek eek however not all of the prosections in article 10 designation would provide, but to your point we do think while we haven't thoroughly studied it and because we specifically looked at the development patterns here as being the boundary justification for the development of the woodward gardens area and this cluster of romeo flats there was certainly a lot of rebuilding happening in this area after t
pearlman --. >> commissioner johns. >> yeah, you are. >> i department to follow up with mr.ld this be -- is there a district potential in this area that this would be part of so it might be part of a bigger district? or i know that in like west soma on the alley streets they're the small residential buildings there that got noted in the contact statement, and therefore are historic resources and have some level of protection. if it could be the same kind of thing and this...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
85
85
Mar 19, 2016
03/16
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 85
favorite 0
quote 0
pearlman --. >> commissioner johns. >> yeah, you are. >> i department to follow up with mr.the question could this be -- is there a district potential in this area that this would be part of so it might be part of a bigger district? or i know that in like west soma on the alley streets they're the small residential buildings there that got noted in the contact statement, and therefore are historic resources and have some level of protection. if it could be the same kind of thing and this already has some level of protection because of inner mission context. >> that's correct commissioner. for the purposes of ceqa this is a category a district so it does have protection for the purposes of seek eek however not all of the prosections in article 10 designation would provide, but to your point we do think while we haven't thoroughly studied it and because we specifically looked at the development patterns here as being the boundary justification for the development of the woodward gardens area and this cluster of romeo flats there was certainly a lot of rebuilding happening in t
pearlman --. >> commissioner johns. >> yeah, you are. >> i department to follow up with mr.the question could this be -- is there a district potential in this area that this would be part of so it might be part of a bigger district? or i know that in like west soma on the alley streets they're the small residential buildings there that got noted in the contact statement, and therefore are historic resources and have some level of protection. if it could be the same kind of...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
106
106
Mar 24, 2016
03/16
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 106
favorite 0
quote 0
pearlman --. >> commissioner johns. >> yeah, you are. >> i department to follow up with mr.rye about the question could this be -- is there a district potential in this area that this would be part of so it might be part of a bigger district? or i know that in like west soma on the alley streets they're the small residential buildings there that got noted in the contact statement, and therefore are historic resources and have some level of protection. if it could be the same kind of thing and this already has some level of protection because of inner mission context. >> that's correct commissioner. for the purposes of ceqa this is a category a district so it does have protection for the purposes of seek eek however not all of the prosections in article 10 designation would provide, but to your point we do think while we haven't thoroughly studied it and because we specifically looked at the development patterns here as being the boundary justification for the development of the woodward gardens area and this cluster of romeo flats there was certainly a lot of rebuilding happ
pearlman --. >> commissioner johns. >> yeah, you are. >> i department to follow up with mr.rye about the question could this be -- is there a district potential in this area that this would be part of so it might be part of a bigger district? or i know that in like west soma on the alley streets they're the small residential buildings there that got noted in the contact statement, and therefore are historic resources and have some level of protection. if it could be the same...