mr. pearlman said open to reshaping it but create shadows at different times of the day. >> he's come uph different phases and bedroom extensions the problem we've seen over time it is being widened and closer north from our prospective it - the very problem we've discussed with the last year and a half we've also opposed this we know that can't work for us we're at a point it if work it's time to cut it off they're in our opinion a few areas to trade square footage and open to that discussion i'm not sure this is understood conversation is difficult as mr. pearlman appoint there is leeway. >> where is that. >> on the sides of the building the north side a setback i personally don't know what is there for it is created the laciest ration maybe there to protect our solar panels but an agreement to mitigate the savings the square footage will have on the top floor so one and 84 square feet can come down close to zero if we identified both areas i think. >> i'm a little bit confused can you help me out you're okay are having the one and 84 square feet still there. >> no inform i'm sorry we'

pearlman --. >> commissioner johns. >> yeah, you are. >> i department to follow up with mr. frye about the question could this be -- is there a district potential in this area that this would be part of so it might be part of a bigger district? or i know that in like west soma on the alley streets they're the small residential buildings there that got noted in the contact statement, and therefore are historic resources and have some level of protection. if it could be the same kind of thing and this already has some level of protection because of inner mission context. >> that's correct commissioner. for the purposes of ceqa this is a category a district so it does have protection for the purposes of seek eek however not all of the prosections in article 10 designation would provide, but to your point we do think while we haven't thoroughly studied it and because we specifically looked at the development patterns here as being the boundary justification for the development of the woodward gardens area and this cluster of romeo flats there was certainly a lot of rebuilding ha

mr. fry, and i don't mean to draw any comparable comparisons between the two, but the building that's landmark that commissioner pearlman a that involved with, the names quilt where catch restaurant is currently so, if that property was identified as -- and the property itself lacks -- is incredibly lacking in integrity which this commission landmark, if that property were to be a development proposal, what would be the process that that property owner would have to go through? i mean, what is the protection of that building as an architectural structure in this process? >> tim fry, department staff, if we're speaking in particular about the names project building, because the building is significant, for other reasons than architecture, i believe -- well, first of all, a certificate of appropriateness would be required for any certification of the building, the certificate of standards which are the benchmark which this commission the the department uses to evaluate changes would still evaluate any proposal to modify the building under the standards and how that modification affects the overall integrity of the billing

mr. fry, and i don't mean to draw any comparable comparisons between the two, but the building that's landmark that commissioner pearlman a that involved with, the names quilt where catch restaurant is currently so, if that property was identified as -- and the property itself lacks -- is incredibly lacking in integrity which this commission landmark, if that property were to be a development proposal, what would be the process that that property owner would have to go through? i mean, what is the protection of that building as an architectural structure in this process? >> tim fry, department staff, if we're speaking in particular about the names project building, because the building is significant, for other reasons than architecture, i believe -- well, first of all, a certificate of appropriateness would be required for any certification of the building, the certificate of standards which are the benchmark which this commission the the department uses to evaluate changes would still evaluate any proposal to modify the building under the standards and how that modification affects the overall integrity of the billing