mr. perciasepe pofor being here. this is the rule that fterrifie people in my state more than any other people. my questions will be very specific. i want you it know how to terrified people are. this goes -- i'm from the west i'm from wyoming where water is scarce. the resource about which we worry the most and fret the most. you just have people in the west completely terrified about in. i just want you to know that. part of the terrifying effects of this is that the supreme court rejected the clean water act jurisdiction over isolated ponds because they lacked a significant nexus owe navigable waters. we don't understand why the panel is not focusing on what significant nexus means. instead, this rule is focusing on connection. connectivity. the courts have repeatedly said that a connection is not enough. yet the epa is basing this rule on a report that evaluated connections. so i would argue that that is among the umbrella basis for our huge concerns. the western governor's concern. the western attorney's general