mr. peters. mr. peters. >> no. >> mr. peters votes no. dr. fleming. dr. fleming votes aye. mr. vici. mr. vici votes no. mr. kaufman. mr. kaufman. ms. gabbard. ms. gabbard votes no. mr. gibson. mr. gibson votes no. mr. walz. mr. walz votes no. mrs. hartsler. mrs. hartsler volts aye. mr. o'rourke. mr. o'rourke votes no. dr. heck. dr. heck votes aye. mr. norcross votes no. mr. scott. mr. scott votes aye. mr. gallego. >> no. >> mr. gallego votes no. mr. brooks. mr. brooks votes aye. mr. takai. mr. takai votes no. mr. nugent votes aye. ms. graham. ms. graham votes no. mr. cook. mr. cook votes aye. mr. ashford. mr. ashford votes no. mr. bridenstein. mr. bridenstein votes aye. mr. molton. mr. molton votes no. dr. wenstrop. dr. wenstrop votes aye. mr. aguilar votes no. miss wolorsky votes aye. mr. burn. mr. burn votes aye. mr. graves. mr. graves votes aye. mr. zinci. mr. zinci votes no. ms. stefanic. ms. stefanic votes no. ms. mcsally. ms. mcsally votes aye. mr. knight. mr. mcarthur votes aye. mr. russell. mr. russell votes aye. there kaufman. i'm sorry, mr. kaufman. mr. kaufman votes aye. >

mr. peters? mr. peters votes aye. dr. flemming? dr. flemming votes no. mr. gibson? mr. gibson votes aye. mr. walls? mr. walls votes aye. ms. heart? ms. heart votes no. mr. o'rourke? mr. o'rourke votes aye. mr. scott? mr. scott votes no. mr. brooks? mr. brooks no. mr. nugent? mr. nugent votes no. mr. ashford? mr. ashford votes aye. mr. multon? mr. multon aye. mr. burns? mr. burns votes no. mr. graves? mr. graves votes no. mr. zin is an aye. ms. mcfally? mr. knight? mr. mccarthy? mr. russell? mr. russell votes no. >> clerk wall the role of any members who missed the first vote? >> there were no members. >> how am i recorded? >> you are recorded no. >> i would like to change to a yes. >> gentlemen from california? >> he is recorded as a no. >> gentlemen from georgia, mr. johnson. >> mr. johnson is recorded a no. >> any other members? i am sorry gentlemen from rhode island? >> he is recorded yes. >> any other members wish to be recognized? >> clerk will report the tally. >> 33 aye votes and 30 no votes. >> and the amendment is adopted. the question comes on amendment number

and mrs. peterter bunny danced with the philadelphia freedom band and parade goers wore easter best or sillest and judges took winners from a variety of categories. cynthia nelson and her daughter pick a color every year. this your white and silver. >> it's a tradition for me and my family. we come down all the time. sometimes we win and sometimes we don't. >> c henery david keeps the parade going year after sgleer at year, another hopefully big success. sun is out for us. philadelphia is so gorgeous. i'm so proud of them. >> he does it all for. >> the kids. the kids make it special. >> shrima henrey agreed she keeps up the tradition for-year-old taraji. >> i want him to did what i did have fun enjoy, it's religous purposes for us too, other than that we're here to have a good time. >> it wouldn't be a easter promenade without bonnets. plenty of bonnets brimming with flowers and easter eggs. >> happy easter. >> in hen house square, annie mccormick, "channel 6 action news." >> of course all those out

personality, so i'm going to say that, i wish i had more of an opportunity to know him, and so that leaves mr. peter cohen who we've done a lot of work with together in san francisco and has been serving for -- since 2011, so for about four years, so my conflict is that you've been serve ining this capacity for four years and have a tremendous body of knowledge and information but i'm afraid that the connection of your knowledge and body of information is not connecting to the community that needs to experience and can most greatly benefit from that knowledge, so i don't know what to do, so -- >> supervisor tang? >> through the chair, i would just say that again, mr. loftman did reach out to our office, as he shared with us, he does have 25 years of experience and the cdbg funding, and all of that, that was really attractive to to me, he understanding that structure, his day job working for the oakland housing authority, he is out of the country, he's someone i'm interested in having sit on this committee but i think we're all in agreement with ms. hall. >> let me ask a question. >> supervisor cohen

first off, i really want to support peter cohen who has come for reappointment on the committee. mr. cohen as you heard from his remarks [inaudible]. >> i also did like hearing from ms. hall and her experience and i absolutely agree with supervisor avalos and that it could be a great forum for her to learn about how funding decisions are made and how it is that we can better bridge sources to communities that need it. in termser of looking at what this committee does, i know that a lot of the decisions that are made has to do around funding and how you allocate grants, so i do see how mr. stafford could bring with his background with his strategic planning, background, some value to the community as well and someone who did not appear us before, mr. loftman, i really liked his background and what he brought to the table. he did reach out to our office and i know he couldn't make it because he was out of the country but he's someone who has expertise in affordable housing finance, he works for the oakland housing authority, so i think he brings a good perspective to the committee, so

. >> so, our next applicant is mr. peter cohen. who is actually reapplying. >> thank you, i guess good afternoon now, supervisors, peter cohen, and thanks for your consideration on my reappointment. just on a personal note because i want to stay there, it takes time for all of us who serve on these mitt taoe, i have two kids and i'm active in my own community, and i take to this particular committee, it's not a policy committee, you're trying to connect with people. we're hearing people's stories and it's important for us to think about that through our own personal lens. i was first appointed in 2011 to essentially replace a jenlts man called renne who passed away the year prior who is a housing advocate and it wasn't possible to fill his shoes but the role i've tried to play on this committee is being kind of a housing expert and understanding the array of housing programs and the housing that we have in the city and picking up on that perspective renne brought and it continue tos come back when we have community meetings, what's

and mrs. peter cottontail. >> i didn't know he was married. i was behind on that. they arrived in style. look at that. >> you no he what they do like rabbits. >> anyway, that is a ford thunderbird convertible. >> classy. >> cool. >> so it was great to see everyone walking down south street. my favorite parties looking at all a the of the kid and how they are dressed especially the socks with little lace. >> mary jane shoes. >> bow ties. >> yes. >> weather was decent too. >> when my parents lefty walk them outside, for their ride to the airport. i started walking around. >> where did you go, conshohocken. >> very funny. >> i didn't go that far. >> where did you watch the the basketball games, at day night. >> i watched it at a sports bar. it was fun. i wanted to see the two final four games. >> yes. >> it was duke won, and then wisconsin. >> where were you watching. >> i had to go up to new york to do some work, so i -- where did i see it. is there a place called the eventi hotel. >> eventi hotel. >> in the spending floor there is a restaurant and bar. look out wind

mr. peters regarding on energy efficiency provisions included in the kcx contracts and logistics civil augmentation program contracts. amendment number 324 by mr. knight regarding conservation of the southern sea otter while protecting military readiness and activities in the southern california bight. and amendment by mr. peters regarding installation reed readiness. >> are there other members who wish to discuss the amendment, the unblocked package? if not the question of the amendments offered by the gentleman from virginia. those in favor say aye. in the opinion of the chair the ayes have it and the amendment is adopted. other amendments to this section of the bill. gentleman from texas mr. conaway. >> may i have an amendment at the desk? >> the clerk will please distribute the amendment.

mr. peters address a briefing on all research and develop programs that can improve the range and to endurancef tactical vehicles. >> is there any further discussion on the en bloc package? if not the question is argument offered by the gentleman from ohio mr. turner. those in favor say aye. favor say aye. those opposed say no to anything of that your the ayes have it. the ayes have it and the amendment is adopted. are there for the amendments to this section was mr. conaway? >> mr. chairman, i have an amendment. >> the clerk will pass out the amendment. without objection the amendment is considered as read. the gentleman from texas is recognized for five minutes on his amendment. >> i thank you, mr. chairman. i would often withdraw this amendment are unlikely to ask for a folder called to take this opportunity to highlight a shortfall in the carrier fleet as a result of normal maintenance and other things going on. we're now down to 11. this admin would raise that carrier fleet to 12 by 2023 and would help sustain that. the current place is under stress given -- would start by 2023 to put the

mr. peters of title 10 to require the secretary to conduct and a review from performance capacity of the industrial base. in front of the ship from bfi 14 that they may not reduce those the salaries that are pulled from the working capital fund. to make two brief comments related to the effort. one is mr. bishop amendment that says if you're paid by the capital fund that is not headquarters but the amendment to reduce the overhead of the capital region to reduce the bureaucracy at the pentagon i have a lot of statistics as a strength has gone down the number of civilians has not gone down and there is an open letter from 15 different think tanks across the political spectrum urging us to take action. is there further discussion and? to 46 amendment i am not sure what's the inverted corporation? a company it has complied with existing tax code to take a vintage of the provisions there is that what she is getting at? >> yes it is for it applies to the example is like burger king. >> every saving my time. >> we are punishing day company for doing taxes and a legal manner. this is bad policy

mr. president. peter, would you stand and be welcomed by this audience? his colleagues are out of prison, but they are still in the midst of their retrial. they are not free to practice journalism in egypt or in the region. peter was able to sneak a letter out of prison and get it into the hands of journalists in africa. they immediately mobilized a worldwide campaign. journalists everywhere joined in. peter believes that is partly why he is here tonight. he told me something this week. he said, it is so important for us to hold together. let's also take a moment now to remember our colleagues. tonight, jason is imprisoned in iran. he is in prison for the crime of collecting information about internal and foreign policies. that is also known as practicing journalism. we welcome his brother, a tireless advocate for the release of his brother. ali is seated tonight with "the washington post." would you please stand and be welcomed by this crowd? ali, i hope you feel tonight the support in this room for your family and your brother. we hold together with jas

mr. president. [applause] peter, would you stand and be recognized by this audience? [applause] peter and his colleagues are out of prison, but they are still in the midst of the retrial. they are not free to practice journalism in egypt or in the region. peter was able to sneak a letter out of prison and get it into the hands of journalists in africa . they immediately mobilized a campaign. journalists everywhere joined in. peter believes that is partly why he is here tonight. he told me something this week. he said, it is so important for us to hold together. let's also take a moment now to remember our color makes -- our colleagues. [applause] tonight, jason is imprisoned in iran. in prison for collecting information about internal and foreign policies. that is also known as practicing journalism. [applause] we welcome his brother, a tireless advocate for the release of his brother. [applause] he is seated tonight with the washington post. would you police stand and be welcomed by this crowd? [applause] i hope you feel tonight the support in this room for your fami

going according to plan for supporters of these rfra laws like senior fellow for family studies mr. peterike these fixes. why? >> i don't think there was anything wrong with these bills as they were originally passed because they simply create -- there's been tremendous misinformation about what they represent. the impression is being given that these bills represent a get out of jail free card for people who want to discriminate against homosexuals, and that is simply false. let me remind everyone, the bills contain no language respecting discrimination laws no language regarding sexual orientation, they simply pursuant to the first amendment right to the free exercise of religion create a standard of review for deciding cases in which a person asserts that a government action is infringing on their free exercise of religion. they don't decide -- rfra doesn't decide how that case will be decided, how it will come out. it doesn't guarantee the religious person will win. it only says these are the steps that a court needs to do and what they need to look at. >> what would happen if you did

but he allow peter and queen to go back to the punitive master mr. vanderberg. and that is where conspiracy began. peter's story is the story of a perfect conspiracy. it is almost the blueprint for one. how you separate one slave from another. how you deceive them, how you send them off on an errant only to be taken captive. and what was the objective? the objective was to keep him away from the judge. well, peter is later freed. the story is a dramatic one. but there is one for the -- one further know. peter was actually a soldier in the revolutionary war. i found his veterans pensi on. the two men who kidnapped and tormented him are far better known because they have counties named after them in indiana. jean marie was born in illinois. sometimes called g. mary depending on whether you're pronouncing it in the french he grew up in or in english, which was customary in st. louis. he was born to a woman who was enslaved by the french and had been brought into the area before it was even deemed to be american territory. jean marie fought for his freedom and the fr

but he allowed peter and queen to go back to the punitive master, mr. vanderberg. and that is where conspiracy began. peter's story is the story of a perfect conspiracy. it is almost the blueprint for one. how you separate one slave from another. how you deceive them, how you send them off on an errant only to be taken captive. and what was the objective? the objective was to keep him away from the judge. well, peter is later freed. the story is a dramatic one. but there is one further note. peter was actually a soldier in the revolutionary war. i found his veterans pension. the two men who kidnapped and tormented him are far better known because they have counties named after them in indiana. jean marie was born in illinois. sometimes called g. mary depending on whether you're pronouncing it in the french he -- that he grew up in or in english, which was customary in st. louis. he was born to a woman who was enslaved by the french and had been brought into the area before it was even deemed to be american territory. jean marie fought for his freedom and the freedom

mrs. clinton was secretary of state. peter schweitzer author of the book "clinton cash" spoke out on fox news sunday this morning, while clinton's insider lani davis offered a defense of the couple. doug is tracking it all. >> one of the issues raising serious concern about the nextus of the donations to the clintons is how fees paid to the former president for his speeches abroad escalated dramatically after his wife became secretary of state. the fees were often paid by governments and foreign entities with crucial business with the state department. the author of clinton cash said the former president was rewarded at least 11 times with speaking fees of $500,000 from foreign entities after 2009 when his wife was in the position of secretary of state. is it coincidence in a pattern we see repeated dozens of times where large clinton supporters are -- have business before the state department make large payments and favorable actions are taken? i don't think that coincidences occur that frequently. >> clinton supporter and lo

tony -- and pulitzer prize winner, tony doln, and head speech writer for ronald reagan, peter raurenson who wrote the mr. garb -- who wrote the mr. gorbachev tear down this wall speech. the conservative columnist and author. editorial page editor of "the wall street journal," david brooks new york times columnist and mark shields is sparring partner. richard brook husbander the distinguished historian of founding fathers: washington hamilton, adams and marlin. and longtime ballet critic for the new yorker the list goes on and on. but i would also talk about the many others less known to the general public who ated a dash -- who added a -- -- added a dash of tabasco to what became the magazine's trademark. as often irreverent editorial paragraphs most important among these latter were bill ricken balker chris simmons and joe soeb rn. bill ricken bacher wrote two weeks after lbj became president, the editors of "national review" regretfully announce that their patience with president lyndon johnson is exhausted. [laughter] which "time" magazine characterized as the impetuosity of the week. it was joe sobu

peter cook sat down with leew. mr.greece needs to make a list of changes in policies it is prepared to put in place so it can work with institutions to come to a mutual understanding of a path forward so they can get out of the cycle of being from one crisis to another. the rhetoric was not helpful early on and i send a signal to both the greek government and the institutions, as they are now called, that everyone had to attend down rhetoric and get to the technical work of seeing what policies can be put in place to address this. obviously it would be better if the work had been done six weeks ago and not over the next six weeks. no time to waste. my understanding is the president is going to be speaking to the hellenic celebration day. it is not a bilateral meeting. peter: does the u.s. have economic interest in making sure greece stays within the eurozone? mr. lew: there is no doubt that if this leads to a crisis such as greece leaving the eurozone it would cause an enormous amount of disruption and hardship in gree

mr. roberts be at this meeting? peter: the excitation is that he will not be at this meeting, but it is not clear who exactly will show up. there will be members of the legal team including outside counsel for time warner and comcast, but i would not expect mr. roberts there. we will be looking to see who exactly shows up in whether or not we actually get a clean view of them entering the justice department is another question as well. olivia: peter, is a very exciting deal, there are plenty of secondary deals that may be contingent upon this. charter, comcast, what possible concessions might brian roberts actually make to satisfy regulators? peter: there is a list of possibilities, and none of them really all that palatable to comcast. they like the deal on the table or else they would not have signed up but the big one up front is the sheer number of people that will have with the combined companies in terms of their broadband subscriptions. 57% of the country -- it is a big number in the eyes of the federal government.

mr. habeler, you think the helicopters that are currently evacuating the climbers that are stuck should instead be used to help the people of nepal? peter: exactly. you just said it. we have this big thing on everest, the avalanche, so there are dead people. but i think the helicopters would be much more useful to get out the people who are hurt badly hurt, in a really terrible situation. and the climbers should be able to walk back down from the mountain. they should be able to go down to base camp and wherever. i think this is not right, but, of course, the money comes in. everybody on everest they are injured. the helicopter agencies kno the moneyw will be paid immediate -- agencies know the money will be paid immediately. if they rescue a farmer or sherpa in a village, they will never get the money. the agency will never get the money. i'm very sad about this situation. laila: mr. habeler, you sketched a very two-tier system that is very dire and rheumatic. you know -- and dramatic. you know nepal very well. what has this natural disaster meant for nepal and its people? peter: it's terriblepeter: -- pe ter: it's terrible. i'm still

peter. caller: good morning and thank you for taking my call. mr. wilson, if you could quickly, please clarify why the closed-door nature of the negotiations. another commentator on the left -- a number of commentators on the left have been very critical because of the figures he. if they need congress's approval, it seems so strange that they wouldn't be wanting more input and communication with congressman as to what the details of the agreement will be. that is all. thank you very much. guest: of course, they would be able to see what is in the agreement once it comes to capitol hill. i think that this they rather common political tactic that we have seen in the last decade or so. it is the increased demand for transparency in every possible negotiation. sometime, negotiations go better when the doors are closed. people can be honest with each other and trade horses and things like that. that is how appropriations bills used to work when two members of congress would sit in a room and say you get this and i get this and everyone comes out happy i

mr. mccormick, why did you file suit against these new rules? >> guest: peter, the irony here is we support the substance of the rules as around ticklated by the chairman of the fcc and the president of the united states. the open internet standards are to prevent blocking, throttling paid prioritization. but what we're challenging -- and the reason we support them is our industry operates in conformance with those standards today. our industry supports their adoption as regulation. we support their enactment into law by the united states congress. but what we're challenging is the reclassification of internet access from being an information service to a telecommunications service regulated as a common carrier pursuant to century railroad regulation. common carriage as a vestige of the english common law was originally applied to railroads and then to trucking companies and then to airlines but it's been repealed for all of those industries going on over 30 years ago because it proved to impose new costs on consumers, it delayed deployment, slowed innovation a

in his book "clinton cash," peter schweizer explains how fees for speeches tripled in price up to $500,000. after mrs. clinton became secretary of state in 2009. the speeches were delivered in the same time frame that foreign governments sought and received favors that had appeared to be -- had to be approved i should say by the state department. schweizer repeated the claim on fox news sunday today. >> my answer is that's extremely troubling, especially the fact that you find it's a very extensive pattern. this is not one or two examples. 11 instances. one or two examples it's coincidence. when you have this many to me it's a trend. >> there's no proof of a quid pro quo or bribery. clinton supporters say the former first couple took great pains to keep the foundation his speech making and her role as secretary of state scrupulously transparent. >> i can delltell you that bill clinton has nothing to do and religious has a wall between himself and secretary clinton as secretary of state. >> in a statement today, the clinton foundation said since secretary clinton decided to run for president, it is di

peters. >> thank you mr. chairman. thank you for hosting this hearing which is so important for the northern border alongwith ranking member carper. being from michigan we are at the center of an awful lot of trade between canada and transactions across our borders. in fact if you look at the volume of trade that goes across ports of entry of the top five in the country detroit's number two and port huron is number four. so we are definitely the tip of the spear so to speak when it comes to border patrol. it is important issue for my state as well as industry. i want to certainly thank senator johnson for cosponsorship of the amendment i put forward in the recent budget bill to make sure we're fully funding ports of entry that they have security they need and ability to process trade and travel efficiently. that's why i'm going to make a brief pitch to make sure we continue to get funding for the international border crossing, particularly with our new bridge we're constructing between detroit and windsor and port huro

peters. >> thank you, mr. chairman, and thank you for hosting this hearing, which is so important for the northern border, along with ranking member carper and for michigan we're at the center of an awful lot of trade between canada and transactions across our borders. if you look at the volume of trade that goes across ports of entry of the top five in the country, detroit is number two, and port huron is number four. so we are definitely the tip of the spear, so to speak, when it comes to border control. and so it is a very important issue for my state, as well as for the industry and that's why i certainly want to thank senator johnson for his co-sponsorship of the amendment that i put forward and the recent budget bill to make sure we're fully funding our ports of entry. that's why i'm going to make a brief pitch to make sure that we continue to get funding for the international border crossing, particularly with our new bridge, that we're constructing between detroit and windsor and port huron. they do a

mr. fields. next speaker. >> i'm going to move over here so i can monitor the time better. i am peter mace iac and a representative with seiu 10 to one and i agree with everything that steve fields says. there is nothing more frustrating to be here in june sort of at the 11th hour not having no idea what's going to happen as far as funding goes. workers not knowing if they're getting a raise. non-profits not knowing if they have funding to deal with increases in health care and rent and other things. it's a very chaotic situation and it's one i think we can all agree that we shouldn't repeat and at the supplemental hearing that we had a couple of months ago i think i heard unanimous support for seriously addressing this permanent fix and it's to see we're having a hearing now and moving towards that. one thing there are a lot of nuisances and complications with this, but one thing that we can't do is neglect non-profit workers while we address this long-term fix. i do think that we may need to study and put together a working group to look into this in a more detailed way how we do so

mr. fields. next speaker. >> i'm going to move over here so i can monitor the time better. i am peter mace iac and a representative with seiu 10 to one and i agree with everything that steve fields says. there is nothing more frustrating to be here in june sort of at the 11th hour not having no idea what's going to happen as far as funding goes. workers not

peter. i hope that you and mr. issacson will find it amusing that my 9-year-old niece mikhail an and 7-year-old son brennan are debating what is more boring when uncle robby watches book tv or their father watches golf. my question to you mr. issacson is in regards to i am a secular agnostic european american and for the life of me. i cannot figure out how the martin luther king jr. or other social leaders have impacted my life positively a half of one percent. and i just wonder if you think. if you can comment if we as a country because of guilt have placed an amount of import on social leaders as opposed to the jonas salk and i am ashamed to say. i do not know. man. women or created chemo therapy. and radiation. if you can comment on that when i was with "time" magazine. did i feel that political leaders, social leaders got on the cover of "time" and it was odd that the person that invented television. whether it is farnsworth. that was never a cover of "time" or the until that is why i wanted to make andy grove

peter. >> caller: hello, sir. thank you, mr. kessler. i appreciate your audacity and your honesty.oros and his corrupting influence on the democrats? and my question for you is did -- [inaudible] establish the wall between the cia and the fbi in order to protect clinton from the adverse investigations? flush thank you very much. >> guest: yeah, there are so many possible subjects out there, and, in fact almost everyone thinks that they have a book in them. but really is anybody going to buy a book on george soros? i don't think so. when it comes to the other issue of -- what about clinton? >> host: jamie goralik? >> guest: oh, yeah. the so-called wall was developed by a low-ranking justice department official who had the bright idea that, you know you couldn't share information that was developed through intelligence sources versus information that might be used in a prosecution. each though there -- even though there had been 76 prosecutions involving this kind of information before under john martin 75 of which resulted in convictions, many of which were upheld on appeal. so ther

mr. president. [applause] theater, which you stand and be welcomed by this audience? -- peter, would you stand and be recognized by this audience? [applause] peter and his colleagues are out of prison, but they are still in the midst of the retrial. they are not free to practice journalism in egypt or in the region. peter was able to sneak a letter out of prison and get it into the hands of journalists in africa . they immediately mobilized a campaign. journalists everywhere joined in. peter believes that is partly why he is here tonight. he told me something this week. he said, it is so important for us to hold together. let's also take a moment now to remember our color makes -- our colleagues. [applause] tonight, jason is imprisoned in iran. he is of prime -- comprising -- in prison for collecting information about internal and foreign policies. that is also known as practicing journalism. [applause] we welcome his brother, a tireless advocate for the release of his brother. [applause] he is seated tonight with the washington post. would you police stand and be welcomed by

mrs. clinton was influenced by the payments or that she broke any laws. and top clinton defenders have taken to the air waves to blast the book's conservative author peter switzer attack anybody who promotes his work in advance. >> let's see what the book says in advance and i'm happy to come back and if i'm wrong i will be happy to say it and i think it's a political job and can smell it a mile away. >> reporter: chelsea clinton said thursday the foundation will not change its practices. >> the work will continue as it is. i think that is the right choice for the people being affected by the work. >> reporter: the big question is whether the foundation's financial dealings with the blurred lines between donors and the clinton family's accumulation of wealth will matter to voters for now hillary clinton and surregits say people do not care or see the alleged conflicts of interest david with al jazeera. >>> comcast says it's dropping the bid for time warner, the merger would have been worth about $45 billion, both the department of justice and the federal communications commission raised concerns that the deal would not benefit the public here is what they said

mr. scott as he's on the ground? and now i'm going to re-ask you, peter gleeson, if you could look at the item -- blow it up as big asle. does that resemble the shape of a taser, now i'm going to ask you if it resembles the shape of perhaps the cartridge that might be what flew out of his hand and flew behind him? >> again, it's not discernible. but to your point and to the point of the panel, if -- if the wire was attached to mr. scott, is it reasonable for the officer to walk with the taser device which is still attached to the -- the wires are attached to mr. scott as well as attached to this device he has in his hand. is it logical to walk over there and drop that next to him? i don't know. did he pick up the cartridge -- i'm assuming this cartridge is about the size of an average ink cartridge in a printer. >> it's not too far afield that that might have been the shape or size? i want to be clear. every detail is going to matter in this case. either one, whether he dropped a taser at the body or whether he dropped the cartridge would lead some to believe that he was trying to make sure the tazing happened where

peter. i hope you and mr. isaacson will find it amusing that my minored niece and my stenin other words nephew are constantly debating when the is more boring, when uncle robby watches booktv or their father watches golf. but my question to you, mr. isaacson i am a secular agnostic european american and i can't figure out how martin luther king or other social leaders have impacted my life positively, one half of one percent. and i just wonder if you think -- if you could comment if we as a country, perhaps because of guilt, place an inordinate amount of import on social leaders as opposed to the salk, the henry padreses, the steve jones, the bill gates and i'm ashamed to say i don't know the man or women who created chemotherapy and radiation. if you would comment. >> guest: when it was at time "time magazine" i felt that political leaders got on the cover but it was odd that the person who invenned television, whether it -- you can debate -- that was never a cover of time, or the people -- and sew that's wha

host: let us hear from peter online for independents. caller: i would like to thank mr.llsberg and disagree with the college -- caller who didn't. to someone who are risk their career and go to jail, here is mr. ellsberg today still standing by his principal's. what is going on is that we have lost our constitution. we had people in prison with no speedy trial for years. that is pretty much all i've got to say. guest: thank you very much. obviously, i agree that the motives of these people deserve to be argued in court and recognized and they deserve a fair trial. the espionage act cannot give them a fair trial. keep in mind that i'm not saying that people with good motives right knee or manning or anyone else -- his motives of giving information to a mistress were a more favorable biography are not once he wanted to argue in front of a jury. he still have the right to do it. other people like jeffrey sterling who had very good motives and manning and others -- that doesn't mean that they should automatically get out. the jury can decide that the motives are not good eno

mrs. clinton was influenced by the payments or that she broke any laws. and top clinton defenders have taken to the air waves to blast the book's conservative author peter schweitzer, to promote his book in advance. >> i'd be happy to come back. if i'm wrong about it i'd be happy to say it but i think this is a political put up job and i can smell it a mile away. >> chelsea clinton insisted the foundation would not change its practices. >> the work will continue as it is. i think that's the right choice for the people who are being affected by that work. >> according to tax documents though the work most affects foundation employees. not people across the globe in need of charity. irs forms covering the year 2008 to 2012, indicate the clinton foundation spent $110 million on employee salaries and benefits. that's more than the $75 million the foundation spent on charity program grants. asked about these ratios, the clinton foundation did not respond. over the weekend the clinton foundation admitted to making mistakes an how it disclosed some donors and the foundation's acting chief executive said the foundation would refile some of the forms. quote, yes can he mad

mr. chairman, i yield back. >> thank you, senator peters. senator rubio. >> thank you. thank you for yielding your place so i can make it to the next one. commissioner o'reilly, i want to begin with you. use of wireless broadband and internet connected devices has provided all sorts of economic growth and innovation that was previously, quite frankly, unimaginable. wireless traffic as we all know is projected to grow exponentially in the years ahead. because of this i introduced legislation to free up additional spectrum for commercial use, both licensed and unlicensed. i strongly believe that we should be enacting policies that ensure that the united states continues to lead the world in wireless innovation and technology. unfortunately, it's my personal opinion -- i think those of others -- that the fcc net neutrality order is quite frankly the opposite of what we should be doing. i would be interested to hear you talk a little bit about the impact the order is going to have on wireless and wireless consumers who are interested in this topic and may not understand its

mr. walker, there's no energy that's going to be transferred to you. >> and just lastly and very quickly, peter, pulling someone over for a taillight, there's been a lot of criticism about this. but it is just fishing in a particular community you're targeting. many say those in the black community feel that's an excuse to pull. but the supreme court in that state actually said, this is a serious thing. it needs to be dealt with. and taillights ant that out of the ordinary, are they? >> the u.s. supreme court has ruled that even if the officer is mistaken as to the actual law, as long as that officer is pulling the individual over in a good-faith basis, the stop is good. >> peter gleason, thank you. dennis root, thank you as well. very helpful as we try to parse out what happened before, during and after this incident. before the gun came out in the shooting death of walter scott, we hear and see police saying taser. the officer says, taser. it's a device that is on the hip of more and more police officers these days. so why wasn't it enough to take care of this situation? we have a person comi

peter. >> caller: hello, sir. thank you, mr. kessler. i appreciate your audacity and your honesty.nge for you. how about investigating george soros and his corrupting influence on the democrats? and my question for you is did -- [inaudible] establish the wall between the cia and the fbi in order to protect clinton from the adverse investigations? flush thank you very much. >> guest: yeah, there are so many possible subjects out there, and, in fact almost everyone thinks that they have a book in them. but really is anybody going to buy a book on george soros? i don't think so. when it comes to the other issue of -- what about clinton? >> host: jamie goralik? >> guest: oh, yeah. the so-called wall was developed by a low-ranking justice department official who had the bright idea that, you know you couldn't share information that was developed through intelligence sources versus information that might be used in a prosecution. each though there -- even though there had been 76 prosecutions involving this kind of information before under john martin 75 of which resulted in convictions,

mrs. clinton facing a firestorm as questions mount about cash donations to the clinton foundation and from whom. >> this offer peter schweizer is a very meticulous detail-oriented person. >> he admitted he has no proof and, b, makes these insinuations that are this partisan-fueled fiction. >> can these stories really be dismissed in front of some right wing conspiracy? should "the new york times," "the washington post," abc and fox news have cut exclusive deals with the publisher? >>> diane sawyer's much balancehyped interview about bruce genre changing his gender. >> are you a woman in. >> yes. for all intents and purposes i am a woman. >> was it sensitive or sensational? >> she almost quit the bush white house before becoming the president's spokeswoman and says she was too nice and polite. a conversation with dana perino. and ben affleck whose ancestors included a slave owner apologizes for a pbs cover-up. i'm howard kurtz and this is "mediabuzz." >> hadn't read the book "clinton cash" when "the new york times" questioned whether hillary clinton did favors for big conors to her husband's global foundation yet th

mr. boozman: as in executive session, i ask unanimous consent that the nomination of peter neffinger of ohio to be assistant secretary of the homeland of security be referred to the committee on science and transportation that reporting out of the discharge or the nomination the nomination then be referred to the committee on homeland security and governmental affairs for a period not to exceed 30 calendar days after which the nomination if still in committee, be discharged and placed on the executive calendar. the presiding officer: without objection. mr. boozman: mr. president i ask unanimous consent that when the senate completes its business today it adjourn until 9:30 a.m. wednesday april 29. following the prayer and the pledge the morning hour be deemed expired the journal of proceedings be approved to date and the time for the two leaders be reserved for their use later in the day. following leaders remarks the senate will be in a period of morning business with senators permitted to speak therein for up to ten minutes each until 10:30 a.m., with the time equally divided in the usual

reporter: well, peter, white house officials tell me we should expect to hear a lot from all corners of the administration in the coming days including tomorrow from the president himself. today, mr. obama sat down with "new york times" columnist thomas freidman, who's the middle east expert. officials here appear to realize they do have a lot of selling to do, but they say they're confident that the facts are on the president's side. they believe the democrats are skeptical while the talks were going on will have a different reaction now that there are details to look at. as one official told me, the closer you look at the deal, the more you'll like it. they're arranging classified briefings for lawmakers when congress returns in a couple of weeks. peter. >> john, you say the white house is confident, but what gives them so much confidence they can turn these lawmakers around? >> reporter: well, in particular they think that the scientific details of this deal are what's going to turn this around. and to sell that they're counting on energy secretary ernest moniz, a little-known member of the cabinet with a much-noticed head of hair. he's one of the world's top nuclear physicist

peter says some nations that made donations that favorable treatment from the u.s. while mrs. clinton was secretary. >> if you ever have an issue of a flow of funds to political candidates, whether that is to private foundations or their spouse, is there evidence of a pattern of favorable decisions be made for those individuals? the point we made in the book is that there is a troubling pattern with dozens of that occurring. betty: those are your top headlines. back to one of the top corporate stories, shares of deutsche bank dropping. plan for a massive overhaul. we will show you that in a moment. thousands of job losses. the ceo has been speaking with hans nichols and just moments ago, they wrapped up their interview. hans: we are completely fine. as we demonstrated in the first quarter, this morning we reported a very solid quarter with strong operating. >> no need because of litigation's challenges. anshu: no need. betty: hans nichols is joining me fresh off of that conversation. hans: there have been a lot of talk, a lot of hype, about a very drastic overhaul. deutsche ba