mr. pillpal. >> i'm sorry, manager of the bureau of environmental management, mr. pillpal is actually correct. it should say the planning department determined, and the bureau of environmental management recommended. [ microphone feedback ] >> commissioners, since the -- the ceqa language in the resolution and the error is in the staff report, i don't think there's any amendment you need to make. >> commissioner kwon: okay. okay. so i think we're good. do we need to take a vote? >> yes. >> commissioner kwon: all in favor? opposed? next item. >> item 13, approve project number cwwsipd 01. [ inaudible ] and adopt the required california environmental quality act findings, including a statement of overriding considerations in the mitigation and authorizing report program and authorize the general manager to proceed with construction of the project. >> good afternoon again commissioners. karen cubic, waste water program capital director. the biosolid environmental review by certified by city planning last week, march 8th. yea: so i am ve [applause]. >> so i am very exci

mr. pillpal. welcome. >> david pillpal. just a minor environment cal concern on 9-c, on page two, the description of environmental review of this action, the city of san francisco is making an action that the sewer is exempt from ceqa. that may well be the case, but the action before you today is to authorize the license, and there's no discussion here of whether that license approval is itself subject to ceqa. i'm not sure that it is, but i think that language should be in here because it's actually your action. further, i'm not sure, based on my prior research, that another agency's exemption determination under ceqa can be used by a different agency. there is a -- certainly a responsible agency relationship in ceqa for eir's and negative declarations, but i don't believe that that also carries forward for exemptions. but in any event, the action before you is on the license approval and not the underlying sewer's replacement that the city of south san francisco would be performing in the right-of-way under the license. i

mr. aarons. next speaker, please. >> david pilpal. >> david pillpal. i did not hear in this discussion about coordination with caltrans. the intersection of 8th and bryant is a major on ramp for i-80 and the solving it, so again, i oppose the parking removal that's proposed for this project. >> hi. i'm here to offer my support for the 8th street project with a giant caveat pointed at director ramos. i've been at several of these meetings where you've asked director reiskin why don't we have protected intersections? why don't we paint bike lanes through intersections so people know they can expect bicyclists to be in that space? and in fact, this great staff created designs for this project that included protected bike lanes. i'd like to show you what it looks like when the protected intersection, and how it's proposed today, and how much less safe you would feel as a bicycle rider. so if i could use the overhead. so this is the protected design for brannan at 8th. you see that little curb area that would keep highway minded vehicles from clipping a bic