mr. potter talked about, i want to make a couple comments about that. in that it requires [speaker not understood] samplings analysis of water. and making reports. but during that time, operations will continue and in terms of quality assurance procedures, you shouldn't be conducting operations while hazardous materials could be released into the wild. i urge you to conduct a full e-i-r. thank you. >> thank you. next speaker. >>> good afternoon, my name is [speaker not understood] brian. i am a former intern at the [speaker not understood] and a law student at hastings college of the law. i have to get back to class so i'll try to be brief in my support of a full e-i-r of the sharp park pumphouse project. one of the things i love about the bay area compared to any other city or [speaker not understood] that i ever lived in is the way that the natural world and the urban environment are combined. pacifica exemplifies this. it is one of the more beautiful places in the bay area and i've sure it's a lovely place to play golf. i do not do so. but if you go

mr. potter. let me start off with a first question that i know you and i briefly discussed this. we know that the planning commission reviewed this matter and supported the decision of staff with the 7-0 voting, members appointed by this body. i want to ask you, is the information that you just raised about the potential lack of funding or analysis on the part of, of the federal department around some of these mitigation measures, what you discovered over the last few days, that is the crux of what you think of as new information since the planning commission's decision? >> that's correct. that information did not become available until march 19th, after both the planning commission and the rec and park commission votes occurred. >> thank you. i certainly want to ask the planning staff if you can address the set of concerns that were raised by the opponent. supervisor kim? >> actually, i was going to ask mr. porter was he upset at the end about the alternative [speaker not understood]? if you could finish your sentence. >> i'd be happy to. the alternative proposed by the expert i

mr. potters or banks of the world. david: mr. potters. >> average joe is in a lot of trouble. >> hank, todd is all riled up. todd says this is fed-driven rally, but hank, i happen to know for a fact that you think this is a good time to get into the market. why? >> look, i think we're in the middle innings of a secular bull market. we're nowhere near the end of it. most bull markets end or bear markets start in anticipation of a recession. the likelihood of a recession is infin testily small next 12 or 18 months this. is rally borne of fundamentals, borne offers growth confirmed with dividend growth. but it is true fed policy has been a helpful backstop but it is not a fed-induced rally. it's a fundamentally-induced rally. david: on the other hand, randy there is still all that sideline money and much of it is still on the sidelines. that great rotation we heard about from fixed income into capital markets hasn't really happened yet, has it? >> not a big way, no. we have seen some flow of fund back into equities early this year bu

mr. potter, if you could elaborate just a little bit more on -- i know planning referred to the mitigation and significant environmental impacts. and you brought up the u.s. fish and wildlife review and whether they've considered that m bio2b mitigation. could you just explain why that's so significant as well? >> sure. so, the fish and wildlife service has implemented and reviewed one other mitigation measure called mitigation measure 2a. that one has some relatively modest constraints on the rec and park department to simply survey the construction area before they start digging the area, for example, to make sure there are no individuals in the way of the excavation project before they move forward. the issue dealing with acid -- acid release into the environment is a much more complex issue. it requires extraordinary scientific expertise to understand the biochemistry of this issue, and to implement mitigation measures for it. if -- and we already know that the soil types that are out -- that create these conditions are present on the site. they are easily identifiable by their color,

mr. potter, thank you for being here tonight and thank you for your commitment what you've done to peoplen the health care field. i want to bring in nyu professor bob sacrum. you have written a piece how the democrats should handle health care on the road back home in getting the message across. your reaction to the dishonest ads that are unfolding in front of our eyes. >> it's the same thing actually they had been doing from the beginnings. from beginning they want to turn obamacare into obama scare and we just moved on. the americans possess prosperity ad is a -- i think it's good to call them out on these lies. you did it brilliantly today. i think the other thing democrats have to do is stop being wimpy and miscalculating this and get off the defensive and go on the offensive. they have to say, look, congressional republicans have voted 51 times to get insurance companies deny coverage for preexisting conditions. 51 times to let them cancel your insurance policy when you need it most and when you're sick and 51 times to kick the kids up to the age of 26 on which their parents snucioin