mr. ramirez now. if we think that mr. ramirez has changed his requests a number of times and has filed a last-minute complaint, and if we assume that is some indication of gaming the system, what should we do with that with respect to assessing the sincerity of his beliefs? mr. kretzer: you can assess the sincerity of mr. ramirez's beliefs by looking at the best evidence in the record, one hand written signed grievance after the other, requited late -- other, repeatedly requesting the same thing. >> people file letters in nonreligious contexts. it is evidence that they obviously don't want to be executed. and in some instances they are gaming the system. my question is, can one's repeated filing of complaints, particularly at the last minute, not only be seen as evidence of gaming of the system, but also of the sincerity of religious beliefs? mr. kretzer: i can see how a hypothetical inmate filing a last-minute request might be so construed. i do not play games. when the state set the execution date in the year 2020, i fil

mr. ramirez now. if we think that mr. ramirez has changed his requests a number of times and has filed a last-minute complaint, and if we assume that is some indication of gaming the system, what should we do with that with respect to assessing the sincerity of his beliefs? mr. kretzer: you can assess the sincerity of mr. ramirez's beliefs by looking at the best evidence in the record, one hand written signed grievance after the other, requited late -- other, repeatedly requesting the same thing. >> people file letters in nonreligious contexts. it is evidence that they obviously don't want to be executed. and in some instances they are gaming the system. my question is, can one's repeated filing of complaints, particularly at the last minute, not only be seen as evidence of gaming of the system, but also of the sincerity of religious beliefs? mr. kretzer: i can see how a hypothetical inmate filing a last-minute request might be so construed. i do not play games. when the state set the execution date in the year 2020, i fil

mr. ramirez, seemed to not have specifics what's happening.to make clear that we have debates about gun coulture. there's no debate on the security side of the faa. there are rules. the rules are clear state laws. nra. no one can trump those rules. you have to disclose and declare guns and ammunition. they have to be in a secure lock and have to be checked. so there's only two options right now. that's why this investigation will be quick. either someone forgot they had a gun. that's hard for people to imagine. for the they had a gun and accidentally discharges going through security in some bag or someone got through with a loaded gun and an accidental discharge near or on the other side of the security gate. neither is good, but neither is an active shooter case, and we need to get to the bottom of that. responsible gun ownership comes with a requirement to follow the faa rules. so my suspicion or my, since the airport seems very clear that this was accidental, the passenger may not have known. i know, surprising, that they had a gun, and th

mr. ramirez is on the line as well. may be he can answer the detailed question like that. >> i'll be happy to. thank you, steve. the revokable permit was issued in 2002. there's no end date. it's at the discretion of the city to revoke it. there's no term to it. >> president moran: we're pursuing some revisions to the permit and it sounded like it was unrelated to the cross country course. did i get that right? >> we will update our permits. lots of things change overtame. this permit is almost 20 years old. this is just one of those permits. we started working probably over a year ago with san mateo folks. long story short, obviously there's not agreement about the current operation and the issues associated with it. as steve said earlier, cross country course has been in place for almost 50 years, the permit was 20 years ago. it's described in our peninsula watershed management plan as an existing use. we were on a task to issue a new license with 21st century details in it. we need to make sure that existing use then

mr. ramirez 16-year-old son died from the vaccine and the nurse who called to tell us that 10 out of 12 peopler icu were people who were fully vaccinated. and a man who called about a relative who tested negative for covid one day, got vaccinated the next day, and died. host: are you unvaccinated? caller: i thank those callers for their courage. host: will you ever take the covid vaccine? will you get to a point that you will trust it? we lost our brother. phone lines if you want to call in this thanksgiving morning and tell us about what you are thankful for and what the country should be thankful for, (202) 748-8000 in the eastern or central time zone. (202) 748-8001 if you are in the mountain or pacific time zones. we showed you president biden just a little bit ago. it was kevin mccarthy on the floor of the house last week talking about the biden administration's policies, what it's done to prices in this country, and painted this picture of thanksgiving 2021. (202) 748-8003 --[video clip] >> it is thanksgiving. i guarantee what they will talk about, this is the most expensive thanksgiving

mr. ramirez who said that pfizer killed his 16-year-old son? many parents like him, but what about all the icu nurses who are saying they will never take the vaccine because they are witnessing themselves horrific injuries in the emergency room? why are doctors covering this up? guest: i would say haven't heard of any of those cases, i'm sorry to the ramirez family that they lost their son. but i can't speak to that because i do not know. but i can tell he is pfizer pays me know many to be here. my salary does not change whether you take it or not. i am just tried to give you -- i am just here to try to give information to feel safe. just be cautious, because there is a lot of false information. the medical community at large, the staff i work with, we are all very supportive. we do not have a secret agenda, we want to help keep you interfamily safe. host: from new mexico. good morning. caller: hi, i'm a little nervous. i've been watching this whole thing unfold. i get my booster wednesday. but i'm curious about one thing. nobody, none of you -

mr. cotton: i sadly join my colleague and friend, senator boozman, to honor the life and service of frank ramirez. every time that a police officer kisses his or her family goodbye before the shift every time they strap a side arm on or put on their badge, they know that it may be the last time they see their loved ones. these heroes accept that danger because their love of their families, neighborhoods, and communities is greater than any fear they may face on the job. our men and women in blue don't just talk about doing good. they actually do it each and every day. sadly far too many of them have had to make the ultimate sacrifice. in the course of their service. one such hero was arkansas sheriff's deputy frank ramirez. a week before thanksgiving deputy ramirez was working after midnight when a call went out there was an accident. he answered the call and quickly drove toward the scene. but it was raining hard that evening. roadways were slick. and as deputy ramirez rounded a left turn on highway 14, he lost control of his car, ran into a culvert, and was sadly killed in the resulting crash.