mr. randall in the house press gallery. really looking at the bottom of the page 3699. there we go. that is not its. is it 3699? that was it, i'm sorry. this is mr. rendell speaking at the conference. i did not expect any special treatment because i am a member of conference. whatever mistakes, if any, i have made. has a matter of fact, i truly believe that those in public service really have a higher obligation than people who vote for them -- this is a twisted final phrase, is this a correct copy of the transcript? >> that is my understanding. yes. i am a lawyer, congressman. >> with his lawyer were in here and said this is not a true and correct copy of the transcript, would we toss it out? >> he produced this document to us. >> high yield back. >> to other members have questions they wish to ask? >> i will keep my questions as it relates to a specific issue. a few things. on page 74, you state that the evidence in the record makes clear that the respondent accepted a favor or benefits in the form of leasing the rent stabilized apartment for his campaign office. this violated the

mr. randall in the house press gallery. really looking at the bottom of the page 3699. there we go. that is not its. is it 3699? that was it, i'm sorry. this is mr. rendell speaking at the conference. i did not expect any special treatment because i am a member of conference. whater mistakes, if any, i have made. has a matter of fact, i truly believe that those in public service really have a higher obligation than people who vote for them -- this is a twisted final phrase, is this a correct copy of the transcript? >> that is my understanding. yes. i am a lawyer, congressman. >> with his lawyer were in here and said this is not a true and correct copy of the transcript, would we toss it out? >> he produced this document to us. >> high yield back. >> to other members have questions they wish to ask? >> i will keep my questions as it relates to a specific issue. a few things. on page 74, you state that the evidence in the record makes clear that the respondent accepted a favor or benefits in the form of leasing the rent stabilized apartment for his campaign office. this violated the te

mr. randall has candidly acknowledged in each case that he breached his responsibility and his defense is this is late not a defense because failing to do so to meet your obligation, whether it is by accident or red -- or bad record-keeping, is not a defense. he is saying, and kelso is a green, that he did not solicit any money for his personal benefit. as mr. but bill indicated, members of this body to solicit for educational institutions. they are named after themselves. it is a practice that should have never been allowed in this congress. it was a -- it was the matter in which she did it that got him into trouble. these are serious concerns. the process by which we got here was long and complicated because a lot of concern on the part of the american public. that is essentially what happened. the question that we face is now sanctions. as mr. chandler said, we have an obligation to the institution and we have an obligation to be judges and fair to mr. rangel. the sanctions will be serious whatever it is. this committee will make its recommendations and the whole body will make the dec

mr. rangel's son. -- randall -- stephen rangel, his son. during the relevant time period, he lived on 64th. >> thank you for that response. ibis serious question i intended to mask of that mr. riegle's council. i'll be happy to submit them for the record, madam chair. >> those questions will be submitted for the record. >> i yield back. >> the gentleman yields back. do additional members have questions? whoever wants to. mr. harper, do you have questions stocks >> yes, madam chairman. thank you. mr. chisam, you were asked earlier by mr. butterfield if he had received personal financial benefits on the issue of corruption. i would like to polo the summary judgment if i could, page 59. is that available on the screen? >> i do not think we have that. >> mr. chisam, if you would like to refer to page 59 of your motion for summary judgment. the first full paragraph, the sentence says, "donations to the rental center where a benefit to the respondent." it's like a drop down to the fourth paragraph on page 59 it said, "the respondents received bene