>> hey, mr. ray. nice evening. >> aldo, you came back to see me. you, my friend, have a problem of points. >> a problem with points? >> wonder what the odds are aldo's going to come out of this with any money at all? let's go ask raissa d'souza, professor at the university of california at davis. not yet. hi, raissa. thanks for coming. i hope we can clear up the confusion that we saw with aldo and jerry. i have a feeling jerry's getting the short end of the stick in this deal, is that right? >> definitely. and to understand how to clear up the confusion, we're going to have to go back in time, back to the 17th century. >> so fermat and pascal were trading these letters back and forth, effectively trying to understand how to fairly divide the pot in a game of chance that had been interrupted. so aldo and jerry are in the same situation, i guess. so now we know that jerry has three points, aldo has one, and there's a 50-50 chance at every roll now that either one of them will win, is that right? >> exactly. so now we have to go forward and iterate al

mr. hartz, ten minutes. >> >> members of the ethics commission ray hartz, director of san francisco open government, i will be using slides and so we may go back and forth here. throughout this i want to consider something that equinis teaches and that is willful ignorance of what ought to know is a mortal thing. 67-16 reads in this last sentence any person speaking during a public comment period may supply a brief written summary of their comments which shall no more than 150 words be included in the minutes. i think that is a pretty clear reading of the language and i think that most people so far have agreed with my interpretation. but we will get into that later. now the city attorney has added some things and the good government guide and memo and says that the summary is not part of the body's minutes or for its accuracy and the minutes may expressly say so it may be included to the minutes and may reject the summary if it exceeds the word limit or not an accurate summary of the public's comment. the speak's public comment. memo from your staff sort of viewed this as one particular incident alone and

hey, sugar ray leonard can eat here on the house. yeah! yeah! mr. morgan, did you hear that? mr.sofa... desk... you know what? why don't you go get some frozen yogurt. i got this. you're so sweet. you got this, right? i do got this. let us get everything off the shelf, and to your home. sofa... desk... you know what? why don't you go get some frozen yogurt. i got this. you're so sweet. you got this, right? i do got this. let us get everything off the shelf, and to your home. it's from game of thrones. what do you think? i don't know. if we're going to start a fantasy sword collection-- and i've long thought we should-- is this really the sword to start with? what did you have in mind? well, off the top of my head i'd have to go with excalibur. it gives you the right to rule england. it would be a replica of a movie prop. fair enough. it'd give you the right to rule a replica of england. well, they don't have an excalibur here, so what do you want to do? mm. tough decision. there's no weaponry from lord of the rings forged in a chinese sweatshop? just bilbo baggins' sword over the

ray hartz's favor, thank you. >> questions, by the commissioners for either the complainant mr. hartz or the respondent mr. herrera? >> i have a question for mr. herrera. >> would you mind returning to the podium? >> thank you. >> thank you, mr. herrera. so, the draft format that you distributed today, is that the policy and practice that has been adopted by the library commission going forward? >> it is yet to be adopted but that is what we are intending to do from this point forward. >> and it will be applied to all speakers? >> yes. >> thank you. >> while you are there, mr. herrera, a question. why were you so resistant to putting the 150 words in the body of the minutes as opposed to putting them on as an attachment. >> we had worked with the city attorney's office and followed the good government guide and so based on that opinion, we had basically continued to assert that we were in compliance by attaching them and including them as an attachment. >> but you were aware that after the city attorney had issued that opinion, the sunshine task force said that opinion was wrong and wanted them to go into

mr. ames would you like to make a statement? >> on capitol hill the rays >> the reaction was explosive. in my view the congress behaved in a purile manor silly to a degree that it became almost funny. >> war is too important to be left to generals and intelligence is too important to be left to the spies. >> you had people like glick man interviewing ames and ames made a negative comment about the ca and the way they did business. maybe he has something. >> the ames ace is perhaps the most graph vic visible example of the need to make structural changes in the operation of intelligence community. >> glickman as i understand it has gone to work to represent the movie industry which is more appropriate to his talents because of the unreality of glickman. >> ames was directly responsible for at least 10 of our human assets. >> it is their story that should be told. >> ames showed no row mores for the executions no remorse for the actions. he justified them. he decided it was all a game. >> ames pleaded guilty and received a life sentence. he is serving it in

that both mayor bloomberg as well as our police commissioner ray kelly have a ton of this program is a good thing the whole point of this program mr reduce crime rates but there is a certain amount of blowback critics say that these young men that are being stopped or are not going to be comfortable going to police when they really do need help what are what are your thoughts on this. you know after they have them my stepson and after i started noticing it happening to my nephew and other kids in the neighborhood i started to really see that it was becoming a big problem i really didn't pay too much mind to it because as marceau happened to me so many times growing up that i thought it was normal was part of my culture but you know it was a start affecting when i was see it happen to other people i realize that it was a big problem so i decided to find some type of group that i could get involved with. and you know when i found that group there was fighting against stop and frisk i decided to get involved and you know fight against it from you know from you know from over twenty four hours all the way to now nonstop somewhere and

ray harte, director san francisco open government. and i would like to completely and with great admiration associate myself with the comments from mr. james chafee. mr. chafee has been attending and participating in library commission meetings for over 38 years, and i would say his knowledge and understanding of them and the friends of the library and the library itself exceeds that of all of the library commissioners, the city librarian and every member of this board of supervisors. and yet when he come up here and talks about all these enormous sums of money, you all stand there in silence. thomas equinas teaches that willful ignorance of what one ought to know is a mortal sin. i say more than a mortal sin. i say it's a breach of your fiduciary and trust placed in you by the citizens of the city when you were elected. the bottom line is, as mr. chafee pointed out, the friends raised in a 12 year period over $40 million. they in addition spent down previously raised money another $10 million. and when document requests were made of the public library, mr. luis herrera has been found in violation of the order of the sunshine order t

mr. barnicle's attention back from spring training. we have a first look from "morning joe" "sports illustrated" will be out tomorrow with the pick for the world series the washington nationals defeating the tampa bay raysmid-atlantic cover will be steven strasburg our pitcher as mr. october. >> you know, that's not a bad match-up in the fall. >> yeah? >> the nationals versus the rays. the blue jays are good too, but you've got to play 162 games, i would say in the national league, the odds on favorite. that's a very good team they've got going down there. it's unfortunate that 90% of their fans have no idea what's taking place in the field because they just started showing up about two years ago. >> wes is an orioles fan. they'll be tough this year. >> every year everyone says they're going to be third place and we say play the games. >> not only that, not enough has been said in terms of praise for the job that they have done in baltimore in the shadow of the washington nationals, they have built an emerging contender. >> absolutely. and the yankees will be watching the world series from their assisted living facility. >> eating soft food. >> and the outlet mall. >> and going to bed at 6:00 at night.

mr. cha, what did the security council vote to do in these latest sanctions. >> well, this latest round of sanctions, ray, came at three things. first is interdicting of cargo expected to be of north korean origin that carry missile parts or things of that nature. a blacklist on the import of certain items people can use for their weapons programs as well as individuals and the third element has to do with financial sanctions. trying to block -- u.n. member states blocking financial transactions by north korean companies or front companies that have to be financing. so a comprehensive set of sanctions. >> suarez: joseph detrani, is it hard to craft sanctions? this is the fourth round of escalating sanctions. when a country is so isolated, so poor, so removed from international commerce. >> it's difficult. given that you have over 190 countries, they've found a way to get around the three resolutions of the initial sanctions that were imposed. i think with this fourth resolution it's very powerful and i think the power comes from the unanimity of the international community saying enough is enough and to

mr. gray. >> they found a loaded gun. he has been arrested before, so the fact that a 16-year-old kid is dead, whatever. >> john: commissioner rayhat the riot at the rite aid was unrelated to the march. but others said a riot is the language of the unheard. and he's suggesting more violence and rioting might occur this summer. >> i don't think that's exactly what he i was saying. >> john: please elaborate. >> actually that quote was from--i spoke to him directly. what he said was he wasn't surprised that this happened, and that they were expecting it to happen sooner. this was something that could have happened at any point in time when the whole neighborhood is ignored. he was talking about the fact that they don't even have a community center in a two-mile radius of the place. they've been begging for that. they want them to come in to the neighborhood so they seek that those in power care about the neighborhood at all. >> john: how can those who care learn more and help. >> continue the coverage and pushing back against the coverage in humanizing the victims. despite someone's background, whether or not they deserve to be kil

mr. leahy: -- what we're seeing in -- in her record. new york city police commissioner raykelly wrote in strong support of caitlin halligan and again this week. i ask that his march 5 letter be included in the record at the conclusion of my statement. the presiding officer: without objection. mr. leahy: he talked about her work on antiterrorism case, how she's helped bring terrorists to justice. after all, she was literally blocks away from the twin towers on september 11. you know, it only takes a handful of sensible republicans to do the right thing. this is not a time to victimize her for some sort of political payback or to -- to help out narrow special interests. end this filibuster. let -- let us have a vote. vote for or vote against her. but do what republican senators who signed that 2005 memorandum of understanding said. if they follow what they said back then, they'll vote to -- to end this. i'd put the rest of my statement in the record, madam president, but don't tell the american people that this extraordinarily well qualified woman cannot have a vote up or dow

ray kelly said about her, she possesses the three qualities important for a nominee -- intelligence, a judicial temperament and personal integrity. she must be confirmed without delay. filibusters, mr. president, filibusters are about debating issues. this is an individual. we can't amend her. we simply have to decide whether she is qualified to be on the bench. there is absolutely no doubt. people may not agree with every single thing she said. i don't think anyone in this chamber agrees with every single thing that judges have said or that people that we put on the supreme court have said, but we somehow came together and stood up for one simple principle, that our job is to decide if someone is qualified, if they can do the law, if they can interpret the law. this candidate can do it and she can do it well. if senators ultimately wish to oppose her nomination, fine, and that is her choice, but they shouldn't filibuster an extremely qualified candidate. let her have an up-or-down vote. thank you, mr. president. i yield the floor. mr. lee: mr. president? the presiding officer: the senator from utah. mr. lee: mr. president, i ask unanimous consent for leave to engage in a colloquy

mrs. gillibrand: under the leadership of new york city police commissioner ray kelley, 16 publicly known terrorist attacks on our city have been thwarted since 9/11. our local law enforcement must continue to have any tool available to hem to remain one step ahead of terrorists at every single turn. even at a time of fiscal restraint in washington, protecting our families from the unimaginable should not be a place where we make cuts. according to police commissioner kelley, this amendment would -- quote -- "jeopardize our collective efforts to safeguard new york city." and without a doubt, the overtime and backfill funding that new york constitutions uses are essential to the nypd's layered approach to security. i ask my colleagues to stand with local law enforcement officials to stand with the american public who have given us the duty to protect them. i urge a "no" vote on this amendment because, if passed, this amendment will be putting the training, security, deployments needs to keep us safe in jeopardy. these are not esoteric programs. we are talking about programs that include counterterro