mr. reardon, thank you. >> would the appellant like to come forward? i believe that the appellant must not be present. is there any public comment? does staff have any rebuttal? >> staff requests that the order of abatement be upheld and we're going to move in every possible way we can to ensure they get a permit to remove the use and discontinue what they were doing back in august/september. >> thank you. thank you. commissioners? do i have a motion? i mean, it seems to me a cut and dried case of violation. our planning department made an error in the initial approval but it did not affect anything wasn't already there. so it didn't really materially do anything other than confuse things for a moment. so i think that it makes sense -- >> move to uphold. >> and incur costs. >> incur costs as specified. >> and fees? >> on the basis that it was properly issued. >> on the basis that it was properly issued and proceed with the enforcement of removal of slab in violation. >> a second? >> second. >> there's a motion and a second. i'll do roll call vote. comm