mr. reichert, i want mr. levin to take a minute. what do you want done here? i personally want to see the bad apples thrown out of the barrel and i'm not going to be satisfied watching as typical person, if you've got a big problem, there's got to be a big solution. two people isn't enough. the american people aren't going to believe if they've got the same people there, the same problem there. charlie rangel said there's a cancer here, you've got to remove it. do you agree with mr. rangel? >> i think there has to be action. i was the first democrat to say that mr. miller should be relieved of his responsibilities, and so mitch learner -- i said that a few days ago. i believe we need to get to the bottom of it. just don't throw apples at the top if you have no evidence to support it. and in the hearing today, there was no such evidence. we should have a nonpartisan hearing, not look for political points. >> okay. thank you very much. >>> coming up, the scandal that wasn't benghazi. thomas pickering handles the investigation. this afternoon he learned he's been

mr. reichert on the questions as to whether you knew that this committee, this whole idea of does the committee have the right to know this information and then you sort of sheltered yourself in this idea of i have always told the truth. let's set that aside for a moment. you know that in the process of discovery, when you find subsequent information, console has a duty to disclose that to the opposite party. don't you acknowledge that you had a duty based upon your testimony before this committee of what your actual knowledge was. didn't you have a duty to come forward and disclose that based upon all of this cascading and inquiries. >> sir, i do not believe so, sir. i was imposition of some facts. i was not in possession of all fax. we have done an internal review to see what we needed to do to get these cases going. they were in at exactly the same time. they were getting all of the facts. >> you were not concerned about the timing of the investigation when youtube made the decision to move forward and do the planted question. it was done. we had all the facts and we had made our written res

mr. reichert. the gentleman from alabama, mr. rogers. the gentleman from texas, mr. poe. the gentlelady from california, ms. pelosi. the gentleman from maryland, mr. hoyer. the gentleman from south carolina, mr. clyburn. the gentleman from california, mr. becerra. the gentleman from new york, mr. crowley. the gentleman from new york, mr. israel. the gentleman from new york, mr. engel. the gentleman from virginia, mr. moran. the gentleman from new jersey, mr. pascrell. the gentleman from california, mr. honda. the gentleman from maryland, mr. van hollen. the gentlewoman from california, ms. matsui. the gentlewoman from california, ms. chu. the gentlewoman from alabama, ms. sewell. the gentleman from new york, ms. meng. >> the president of the senate at the direction of that body appoints the following senators as members of the committee on the part of the senate to escort her exlancey, park geun-hye, president of the republic of korea, into the house chamber. the senator from nevada, there reid. the senator from alaska, mr. begich, the senator from new jersey, mr. menende

mr. reichert of washington for their work on this bipartisan, bicameral legislation. a similar measure is spending -- pending before the senate committee. supporters include the national fraternaled or over police, the federal law enforcement officers association, the sergeants benevolent associate and the national association of police organizations. this bill reaffirms our commitment to ensure the safety of law enforcement men and womened on the communities they serve to protect every day. i urge my colleagues to support this bipartisan legislation and i reserve the balance of my time. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman reserves. the gentleman is recognized. mr. scott: i rise in support of h.r. 180 which will establish a coordinator within the department of justice to facilitate issuance of blue alert to help apprehend individuals who are suspected of kills or seriously injuring police officers. i support the bill because it provides critical support far system to protect police officers and the public. it is especially timely as we consider this measure during

mr. reichert on the question as to whether you knew that his committee, this whole idea of does the committee have the right to know this information. and then you sort of shelter just off in this idea of, well, i've always told the truth. let's set that aside for a moment. now, you're a lawyer and i am a lawyer. you know in the process of discovery, mr. miller, when you find subsequent information, council has a duty to disclose that to the opposite party. there is no perry mason moment. there is no gotcha moment. there is no litigious situation where someone comes in and says, oh, we're just showing up, your honor, with this information and we have not disclosed to the other side. don't you acknowledge that you had a duty in based on your testimony before this committee of which are actual knowledge was? didn't have a duty, mr. miller, do, forward and disclose that to the committee, based on all the cascading inquircascading inquit happens on the ways and means committecommittee directed to? >> i don't believe so. what's happening was i was in possession of some facts, was not in possession