mr. chairman and board members pr i didn't do this alone i had a lot of support with edward reiskin and my supervisor here. mr. inconvenience harris and also the staff that's in the office and my family. thank you to them all for their support >> thank you (clapping.) okay. i think we'll just take it (laughter). >> director reiskin i know there's been a lot of decision about pedestrian safety in the chamber hall and it's fitting that a lot of the great work we're thought of fully able to address the pedestrian safety this is a walk through program i'm going to ask the director of the safety streets. >> mr. reiskin i'm here to present the block first team composed of luke's and others. that demonstrated the commitment to the strategic goal number one to create a safe transportation. f that was to create pedestrian projects that will guide implementation and decisions for improved pedestrian safeties it required partnerships with other city agencies and a solid outreach component it's the first in the u.s. pulling together data and local knowledge to build is a incredible destinations for sa

reiskin. members of the public address the board >> yes. mr. chairman we'll start with howard and ernestine and john. >> howard director. i read the one think our site and tried to learn and deal with this thing i'm mostly concerned with the fact it doesn't include any increase in service that's in the reasonable i dependent to have 50 percent more people living in the city that's wrong. i don't want to ask but the way to get extra you funding for the extra service is to really enforce the mercy on the earnings. there's a lot of money people are paying big bucks for short-term parking your sf park system works if a certain neighborhood doesn't have anyone using it it won't charge. that's a good way to charge. my reading you weren't going to continue the zero fairs for needy kids. and if people that's going to be continued well, that should be partially funded from the meters. the other way to fund more service a little bit of money from the v l f that's flexible money from city voters. the other thing is that we have many cities have a premium

reiskin. members of the public address the board >> yes. mr. chairman we'll start with howard and ernestine and john. >> howard director. i read the one think our site and tried to learn and deal with this thing i'm mostly concerned with the fact it doesn't include any increase in service that's in the reasonable i dependent to have 50 percent more people living in the city that's wrong. i don't want to ak

reiskin we secured that funding. i believe a check has been cut and if it's not to mr. mark it should be there soon. we ask there be a report how the funding is utilized just as an invoice of sorts and we're more than happy to request other requests for funding if there are specific needs or recommendations from this committee. >> thank you. colleagues any questions? supervisor chiu. >> a couple of questions and i know we're having a conversation about vision zero and i am glad you're in the role you're in and as you know there have been not only we're in a crisis point in terms of public safety but we had little interaction between the transit group and the advisory group and that's great you're doing it. it talks about 44-miles o injury corridor and there are many more and what is the strategy based on the new numbers. >> the walk initiative which i believe you're talking about identifies the san francisco streets where half of the injuries are occurring so we're identify whag is causing the problems on the 70-miles and develop the counter measures to solve the issues happening on those streets. r