mr. reiskin to fix it between 15 and 30. we'd have to give the contractor notice because they do sell these well in advance. right now, i'll give you an example, there are 7 buses that are wrapped, 7 vehicles that are wrapped. in practice, you probably get -- you might get over 15, sort of the october, november time of the year when you have back to school and halloween and the holidays. we don't anticipate that we'd have 30 buses wrapped all the time. and the fleet is over a thousand vehicles. so, it's less than 3% of the fleet. with us the minimum of 15 wraps that would be $325,000 each year. that is the agreement with the contractor. >> okay. to our -- mr. city attorney, sorry. mr. city attorney, just in terms of our option here at committee, i assume we have a full up or down vote on the entire vote, correct? >> deputy city attorney jon givner, that's correct. they come back with a different contract in their discretion. >> he okay. why don't we -- let's open this up to public comment and then we'll have final discussion

mr. reiskin, that we can begin planning for this as soon as possible. i understand the budget has to go to the board of supervisors yet. things could change there, too. but presumably start planning for this as soon as we can. clipper card changes and those things that have to be worked out. but if members agree with that, i'd like to see it. >> yes. >> so, i also said earlier it's not a question of if these thing are going to happen, it's when. in my mind this ought to be number one as soon as we possibly can do it even before the end of the year if at all possible. okay. we need a motion on the book aboutxctiontionvthv. >> motion to approve. >> is there a second? >> further discussion? all in favor say aye. >> aye. >> opposed no. [speaker not understood]. thank you very much, ladies and gentlemen. we have a couple other items to deal with this afternoon. ~ >> mr. chairman, you are going back now to item 9, general public comment. you will return to new [speaker not understood] director's report before you go into closed session. >> okay. >> so, item 9

mr. reiskin to make a technical adjustment to the budget to include 18 year olds. >> okay. >> thank you. (applause) >> i'd like to go back to one other thing. director reiskin need -- seniors and persons with disabilities, i'd like to ask the voters, we start the process immediately. how with are we going to do that? nothing is easy in an organization this big. i would like to see it possibly available -- when we figure out how to do it and implement it, because that can be much earlier than next year. this year or beginning of next year. so, to my mind, these projects -- and not a question of if, it's really a question of when. we're trying to do it the most responsible way we possibly can. [speaker not understood]. >> and i also want to talk about the sunday parking meters because i know we had a lot of comments on this and this really is -- it's an issue that has been talked about a lot, but i know people on this board have struggled with. and i know staff has struggled with. as you remember in his state of the city address, mayor lee asked [speaker not understood] to repeal sunday par

mr. reiskin. i want to thank the community memorandum gers for speaking out ~ members speaking out expanding the [speaker not understood]. seniors and people with disabilities face incredible, incredibly uncertain future given the displacement crisis going on right now. they are about 140,000 seniors in san francisco and as baby boomers like some of you will become seniors very soon, it's going to be increasing -- doubling within a short, like 8-year period from 2004 a we go towards 2020 and 2030. 27% of seniors now live in poverty and struggle with isolation and many other issues as well. people with disabilities face similar issues. 31% of the seniors, many of our surveys and san francisco department of aging adult service studies, say that 31% of the seniors live alone. they face substandard housing and they need support. the city's improved revenues, in speaking with mr. reiskin, and board members, i think is important that it's tied with a tech boom and the he under armour economic improvemen

mr. reiskin will do. >> withdraw the motion in >> i withdraw the motion. >> i'll second. >> okay. it's withdrawn. and then can we have member consent to ask mr. reiskin to make a technical adjustment to the budget to include 18 year olds. >> okay. >> thank you. (applause) >> i'd like to go back to one other thing. director reiskin need -- seniors and persons with disabilities, i'd like to ask the voters, we start the process immediately. how with are we going to do that? nothing is easy in an organization this big. i would like to see it possibly available -- when we figure out how to do it and implement it, because that can be much earlier than next year.

mr. reiskin. my name is [speaker not understood] and i'm come to you to express our agency [speaker not understood]. to access transportation is only a right issue with disabilities. and a fundamental right we believe for all and many people that we serve every day in our agency really have to make hard choices. whether to pay rent, buy food. a person shouldn't have to make that choice. we need to make sure that people really have access to transportation so that they can live in the community they lowv and no matter what they choose, they can go wherever they want and need to go. i would ask you that you hear our collective voices. we only represent a fraction of the people that really -- that this issue is very important to. and we ask that you really make free muni for 18 year olds and seniors with disabilities happen right now, not wait and work towards making it permanent. thank you. >> thank you, mr. mendosa. next speaker, please. >> rufus abercrombie.

mr. reiskin is aware, there are fair enforcement individuals out there often being intimidating towards those who are ferry baiters, basically an $8 million budget line item and they're able to get a return of $1 million worth of fare evaders. that $7 million -- quite frankly, the fare invaders. fair aloe v-8ers aren't really breaking the law. i understand they're not prosecuted if they don't pay the fine. rather than spending the money and energy on this, why not let people who are senior and disability -- we are the large of

mr. reiskin is aware, there are fair enforcement individuals out there often being intimidating towards those who are ferry baiters, basically an $8 million budget line item and they're able to get a return of $1 million worth of fare evaders. that $7 million -- quite frankly, the fare invaders. fair aloe v-8ers aren't really breaking the law. i understand they're not prosecuted if they don't pay the fine. rather than spending the money and energy on this, why not let people who are senior and disability -- we are the large of the group of seniors -- there are more seniors in this area than in any other city in the state of california and the people with disabilities also deserve your support. so, if you would, please, there's money here and we would like to be able to have the opportunity to ride muni for free now. >> thank you. next speaker. >> paul hickman, anaksul ra mark: a. frank o'connell and see a hell by. >>> i'm a lead case aid. i escort seniors to [speaker not understood]. seniors have a great time. when i do take them out, they really enjoy going out to different places, some satu

mr. jones. >> thank you (clapping) director reiskin. >> so i think we'll safe the balance of the report given the number of people that are here for the budget. >> again ladies and gentlemen, we have two overflow rooms 208 and 16 quietly make sure you give our testimony to the board. >> chairman for the record the advisory committee report will not be given moving on to the consent calendar public may address the commission on matters that are within the commission's jurisdiction and are not on today's agenda decorators no member of the public wants a temp severed. >> i ask that 10 point b be severed. >> so it's severed and you need to recuse you you're on this one. >> on 10.9 so we need to approve the measure. >> all in favor, say i. >> okay. so the consent calendar minus 10.9. >> you can take a motion on 10.9 as well. >> motion to approve the motion. >> all in favor, say i. opposed? >> eaten a the motion to be approved for the item severed. >> all in favor, say i. any further you destruction. all in favor, say i. opposed? and the destruction of the fy for the fines and various rates and cha

ask the mta is it possible director reiskin that in fact the two hundred stops your using there will be new stops currently not being used by shuttles. >> good evening mr. president, and members of the board through the chair supervisor campos. yeah, it's our intent to elevate the potential stop locations within the 2 hundred and subject them to the public hearing process. >> okay in light of the fact the mta is seeing that the pilot could include now stops that are currently not being used by shuttles how can you say that the baseline is not being changed you're hearing from the agency something different could, in fact, be parted of the pilot and. >> we only had the project as proposed before us to analyze. so what we were analyzing the imposition of the project that i described it and as mta will describe it as the existing on the ground conditions the project itself which would identify those stops as one component of it and track the compliance with the stop network and with the operational protocols provided that in itself is not something we can contributed physical impacts to >> again, i building what is a distortion of what the defines of an e