mr. reiskin. i'm a retired taxi cab e xecutive. i'm here to voice my official objection and protest against having to pay the annual taxi cab fee which for persons of my car is twice as much those who are not pre-k. the reason that i was given because the reason that i have to pay twice as much is because i don't hav a driving requirement. no one has driving requirement anymore. nobody checks, nobody is p unished for not doing it. it's rightly so, there's no reason to do it. it's bogus and made up. i want to tell you about my personal circumstance. i started driving cabs in san francisco 1965. i did it as a summer job when i was in college and i liked it so much, i did it on and off again. i did other things. in 1976, i had the opportunity to actually buy a permit. the reason i wanted to do that because it meant freedom to the for me. freedom from having a boss and a schedule, the freedom to work as hard as i pleased. i was told i made good investment, it was my freedom. now i'm being punished for b uying my freedom by having to pa

mr. reiskin did not mention there was a new transit sign up. on saturday, with the significant service changes. there is, at the same time, a transit operator shortage. there are open runs. and service not going out is scheduled a the green division and for part timers on the bus side. this impacts passengers pretty significantly. i have not been out there. there's only an acting superintendent who's also serving as the transportation superintendent at kirkland. this is a significant facility that needs full time person out there. also, related to the service changes. the terminal now known as the sales force, terminal center, really was not ready for muny and they've had to do some work arounds for the trolley coaches involving pulling the poles. and routing continues to use first mission rather than s taying on market. i hope that routing will be reexamined. just to conclude on this item, i understand there's no july 3rd meeting of this board. a number of items will be heard july 17th a month from now that i expect to be controversial. i hope

mr. reiskin we continue to work on k street and third street. is there mib who can meek to -- speak to ms. washington. >> bruno shrader, and mark. >> hello board members. i appreciate to be here. i'm former nco. first i will like to put my opinion. the device, they really -- i'm sure, they can have less mile solution and get cars off the road. we can put responsible for s cooter brands. we have our honors off electric scooters and electric bikes. they need to provide a solution to solve the problem they create. i think this city need to work together. with companies that really care and help as much as possible with a solution. i don't know how we have two years working the product. this is the future of the p lanet. we appreciate it. i would like options to connect and how we can apply maybe for a pilot program for park and charging. thanks so much. >> thank you very much. next speaker please. >> david, last speaker is mark grewberg. >> to conclude for my last comment, the sensible transit lawsuit is pending. you'll hear more about that in the

mr. reiskin. i appreciate your response. >> supervisor cohen: supervisor sheehy? >> supervisor sheehy: again, on the crossing guards, are i know my district, i walked with a mother at school drop off at fair oaks and 24 who had fiven run over with her ear-old daughter. both of them had been hit by a car. so in that reality, this is just a small part of your budget. it's 2.2 million. we went and we opened sanchez school with mayor lee -- everett school on sanchez, everybody was out, watch for kids, and they were a crossing guard down, and i don't think they've ever been filled. i heard supervisor fewer say there were a number of schools in her district that don't have crossing guards. i just -- i feel like -- it would be great to know that every school -- i guess what i'm looking for is a commitment that every school in the city that needs crossing guards will have crossing guards. i mean that's what i'm really looking for. and if you overbudget, and you don't need as many as you might need, but so many schools -- like, the schools that i -- i was -- over on 24th a

director reiskin, the green zones that mr. haley mentioned, do we have a program about where those would be? i do think that the call for equity on those is a really good one because there are certain neighborhoods that are much more impacted by the buses that are s absturntugh. with these if we didn't include in the staff report or resolution but that's our omission but that's absolutely the intent. i think we can make a very dirt connection to those areas that are icty b air quality, such as baby owners point and the mission. we do have zero emission vehicles serving some tse areas. we are looking at deployment of the green zones, the clean zones, clean green zones in those neighborhoods so absolutely. >> chairman brinkman: do you think that we need to move this resolution forward right now? we are saying by 2025 we will be buying only electric and that will put us all electric2035 and the questions we seem to be getting is if we are buying buses will we be buying buses in 2022 or 2023 that are still diesel hybrid and those