mr. reiskin. i'm a retired taxi cab e xecutive. i'm here to voice my official objection and protest against having to pay the annual taxi cab fee which for persons of my car is twice as much those who are not pre-k. the reason that i was given because the reason that i have to pay twice as much is because i don't have a driving requirement. no one has driving requirement anymore. nobody checks, nobody is p unished for not doing it. it's rightly so, there's no reason to do it. it's bogus and made up. i want to tell you about my personal circumstance. i started driving cabs in san francisco 1965. i did it as a summer job when i was in college and i liked it so much, i did it on and off again. i did other things. in 1976, i had the opportunity to actually buy a permit. the reason i wanted to do that because it meant freedom to the for me. freedom from having a boss and a schedule, the freedom to work as hard as i pleased. i was told i made good investment, it was my freedom. now i'm being punished for b uying my freedom by having to p

mr. reiskin, could we make sure staff reaches out to you to discuss this? yes. we'll make sure someone gets in touch with you. thank you so much. do i have anymore public comment? all right. mr. pillpell, and then, you can come up. >> three issues. i mentioned the neighborhood through way. at the same friday morning hearing which was in early june. i forget if it was june 1 or june 8, there was both the haight street neighbor way proposal and a proposal on broadway, both of which staff insisted it would be brought to this board on july 17. that may well have changed because of subsequent planning and events, but i think it's important to keep people informed and to notify them, however they sign in at the hearings, that -- i'm being distracted, that what the status of these changes are. so if there is a date promised, if that date slips, we need to touch back with those people. it's -- the previous speaker just said, it's common sense. it's pretty easy to do. there weren't hundreds of people there, there were a small number of people. i mentioned earlier about t

mr. reiskin we continue to work on k street and third street. is there mib who can meek to -- speak to ms. washington. >> bruno shrader, and mark. >> hello board members. i appreciate to be here. i'm former nco. first i will like to put my opinion. the device, they really -- i'm sure, they can have less mile solution and get cars off the road. we can put responsible for s cooter brands. we have our honors off electric scooters and electric bikes. they need to provide a solution to solve the problem they create. i think this city need to work together. with companies that really care and help as much as possible with a solution. i don't know how we have two years working the product. this is the future of the p lanet. we appreciate it. i would like options to connect and how we can apply maybe for a pilot program for park and charging. thanks so much. >> thank you very much. next speaker please. >> david, last speaker is mark grewberg. >> to conclude for my last comment, the sensible transit lawsuit is pending. you'll hear more about that in the