mr. renney. >> if we get to the decision that is made and that the ethics commission should deal with any claim filed by complaint about a violation of the sunshine ordinance, will deal with the question whether or not there should be at different or special set of procedures. interesting enough, the june proposed regulation took the position that we didn't have jurisdiction to deal with non willful violations. >> i don't need to do it now. >> to not get too far past the previous point, one of the reasons i've mentionedje thewel gomez -- the jewel gomez case, the staff had red 1634 in one direction so that the second sentence that says he will fall violations by elected officials shall be handled by the ethics commission limited them to those only. perhaps it means that those are definitively heard by the ethics commission but doesn't limit what the ethics commission can hear. i did not see that addressed in the staff memo. i would certainly like to hear the views as we go along for a more broad light. they direct you to read it in more of our broad sense. >> i think if i am remembering m

mr. renney. >> if we get to the decision that is made and that the ethics commission should deal with any claim filed by complaint about a violation of the sunshine ordinance, will deal with the question whether or not there should be at different or special set of procedures. interesting enough, the june proposed regulation took the position that we didn't have jurisdiction to deal with non willful violations.