mr. reschenthaler of pennsylvania, he will vote no. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new jersey seek recognition snl. mr. pallone: as the member designated by mr. sires, mr. pascrell, mrs. kirkpatrick and mr. defazio, these members will vote yes on the green amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from colorado seek recognition. >> as the member designated by mr.~wilson, he will vote no. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> barragan, kahele and jacobs, they will vote yes on the green amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from north dakota seek recognition? >> as the member designated by timmons taylor and gonzalez, they will vote no. >> as the member designated by miss rice, that member will vote aye on the green amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan seek recognition. >> as the member designated by mr. up ton, he will vote nay. and

mr. reschenthaler, he will vote no on amendment 4 # 5 -- 455. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? mr. jeffries: as the member designated by chairwoman eddie bernice johnson, i inform the house that she will vote yea on the neguse amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from florida seek recognition? >> as the member designated by miss kathleen rice, i inform the house that the member will vote aye on the neguse amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from colorado seek recognition? >> thank you for your service. and honor to tell you that as the member designated by by ms. porter, mr. castro, ms. pressley, mr. evans, mr. allred, and mr. bomb and that -- bowman that these six memberships will vote yes on the neguse amendment. >> for what purpose does the gentleman from jean seek recognition. >> as the member designated by mrs. what lours ky, mrs. walorski will vote nay. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentle

mr. reschenthaler: thank you, madam speaker. i want to thank my good friend and distinguished chairman of the rules committee for yielding me the customary 30 minutes and i yield myself such time as i may consume. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman is recognized. mr. reschenthaler: thanks, madam speaker. i just want to for the record say there's nothing before us in the rule that has anything to do with any kind of assault weapons ban or policing. this is simply a rule that would waive the 24-hour requirement. so -- and look, to be candid, the democrats have now opened the door for republicans to use this in the future to push forward our agenda which is wanting to protect the rights and liberties of individual people. so i would like to take this time to point out the hypocrisy and the irony i see coming from across the aisle. let me just talk about that. nine days, nine days is all it took before the speaker reinstated her authoritarian covid lockdown, proving once again that house democrats are unable to govern unless they

mr. reschenthaler: thank you, madam speaker. i appreciate it. i yield two minutes to my good friend from the state of georgia, two minutes to mr. hice. the gentleman is recognized. mr. hice: thank you so much. i am amazed at how my radical friends on the left now are so concerned with the lives of children when they literally stand and cheer and celebrate the killing of 3,000 through abortion every single day. but madam speaker, i rise in opposition to this rule that allows the consideration of the assault ban -- assault weapons ban. but what we have here going on right now is a complete disregard for regular order that started yesterday and it's continuing here today. the house floor is being run like a circus, quite frankly, and the american people deserve better than this. they continue, the democrats do, ram legislation through without proper notice and without even markup in committees. the floor should be run with at least the basic sense of decorum, and that is totally out of control right now. there's a complete lack of respect for the ru

mr. reschenthaler: thank you, madam speaker. i want to thank the distinguished gentleman, my good friend from new york, mr. morelle, for yielding me the customary 30 minutes. i yield myself such time as i may consume. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman is recognized. mr. reschenthaler: thank you, madam speaker. the rule before us today provides for consideration of the chips and science act of 2022. after conference negotiations failed on a package to counter the maligned actions of china, the senate drafted this legislation to send billions of taxpayer dollars in the form of subsidies and tax credits to a single industry. democrats' reckless spending policies led to this record high inflation that's crushing american families and small business. the government should not be spending hundreds of billions of dollars to provide subsidies benefiting one industry. this legislation comes to the house just one day after senate democrats announced the do-2, tax american manufacturers and energy producers which will increase the cost

mr. reschenthaler ever pennsylvania, -- mr. reschenthaler of pennsylvania, i inform the house that he will be voting no amendment 14. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. taylor of texas, i inform the house that mr. taylor will vote nay on amendment 14. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. fallon of texas, i inform the house that mr. fallon will vote nay on amendment 14. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek recognition? mr. evans: mr. speaker, brown votes no on the lee amendment. and cherfilus-mccormick votes yes on the lee amendment. the speaker pro tempore: on this vote the yeas are 151, the nays are 277. the amendment is not adopted. pursuant to clause 8 of rule 20, the unfinished business is the question on amendment 15 printed in part a of house report 117-405 offered by the gent

mr. reschenthaler and mr. smucker of pennsylvania, i inform the house that mr. reschenthaler and mr. smucker will vote yes on en bloc number 1. the chair: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from virginia seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. foster and ms. houlahan, i inform the house that these members will vote nay on amendments in en bloc 1. the chair: for what purpose does the gentleman from south carolina seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. joe wilson from south carolina, i inform the house that mr. wilson will vote yea on the en bloc number 1. the chair: for what purpose does the gentleman from colorado seek recognition? mr. neguse: mr. speaker, as the member designated by ms. porter, ms. williams and mr. bowman, i inform the house that those three members will vote no on amendments en bloc number 1. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from virginia seek recognition? -- the chair: for what purpose does the gentleman from virginia seek recognition? mr. beyer: as the member designated by mr. connolly, mr. bo

mr. reschenthaler: thank you, madam speaker. the rule before us today makes in order three pieces of legislation, including h.r. 8294, a bill to fund six of the 12 appropriations bills. as a member of the appropriations committee, i want to say i'm extremely grateful to ranking member granger and also chairwoman delauro for all the hard work that they put in and also that committee staff, i know a lot of efforts went into this legislation. unfortunately, the product before us was flawed from the very start. as house democrats drastically underfunded our national defense while providing major increases to the same social programs that have already received trillions of dollars in funding under the biden administration. it's clear that the democrats' out-of-control spending has been the key driver to inflation. but don't take my word for it. la larry sommers, former economic advisor to president biden, went so far as to call the american rescue plan, and i quote, the least responsible macroeconomic policy we've had in the last 40

mr. reschenthaler and mr. smucker of pennsylvania, i inform the house that mr. smucker and mr. reschenthaler will vote yes on s. 144. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from georgia seek recognition? mr. bishop: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. thompson of mississippi, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. thompson will vote yes on the motion to suspend the rules and pass s. 144. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from north carolina seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. taylor of texas, i inform the house that mr. taylor will vote no on s. 144. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from texas seek recognition? ms. garcia: as the member designated by ms. escobar of texas, i inform the house that ms. escobar is a yes on s. 144. thank you, mr. speaker. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from georgia seek recognition? mrs. greene: mr. speaker, as th

mr. reschenthaler, he will be voting yes. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from colorado seek recognition? >> negd ms. jayapal, mr. porter and these members will vote yes. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from florida seek recognition? >> as the member designated by ms. salazar of florida, she will vote yes. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? mr. jeffries: as the member designated by chairwoman chairwoman eddie bernice johnson, she will vote yes. >> as the member designated by mrs. walorski, she will vote yes on s.337 #. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? mr. babin: as the member designated by mr. taylor of state of texas, i inform the house that mr. taylor will vote nay on s.3373. the speaker pro tempore: the yeas are 342 and nays are 88. bill is passed and without objection, the motion to reconsider is laid on the table. further consideration of h.r. 7900 wil

mr. reschenthaler: -- mr. roy: i thank the gentleman, the gentleman from ohio. i want to associate myself to mr. gaetz's position about what this bill will do in terms of fear and its purpose of creating fear among the people. that's the reality. texas has an alert system. states have an alert system. that's where this properly resides. that's where the police power resides is in the states. in fact, the chairman of the judiciary committee acknowledged this reality. here is a federal program we're going to create with $2 million. you can use it if you want. this is another example of washington creating another government, another position, spending more money we don't have in order to have a policy objective of continuing to advance fear among the american people. remember the covid alerts. how many alerts do we need on our phone to create fear in the minds of the american people? allow the states to make a decision something that's meritorious, whether it's a tornado alert, amber alert, but allow the local jurisdictions make the decisions, not bureaucrats in w

mr. speaker, as the member designated by miller-meeks of ohio, stefanik of new york, reschenthaler of pennsylvania, dr. joyce of pennsylvania, and also comer of kentucky, all those members will be voting no on passage. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlelady from texas seek recognition? ms. escobar: mr. speaker, member -- ms. garcia: as the member designated by ms. speier, ms. leger fernandez, these members will vote yes on h.r. 1808. thank the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. kinzinger and mr. cat go -- katko, they will vote no on h.r. 1808. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from georgia seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mrs. mcbath of georgia, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mrs. mcbath will vote yes on h.r. 1808. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from florida seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. steube of florida, i inform the house that mr. steube will vote no on h.r. 1808. the speake