foster or mr. riley, i would get a different answer, when you say the first day was spent in awe, what was you in awe of? >> roman po lmp arch nmp ski. >> he has been making movies before i was born, since then. roman polanski. >> and i followed him and aware of his status as a film maker and his importance in film history. from you know, the moment i got interested in movies as a kid, fearless vampire hunters was the first thing that i saw. so to then be after 40 years be asked, would you like to work with him? what? [laughter] tavis: let me ask you, i want to get the question out the right way. i get your fascination with polanski as a film maker. how much then does the script play in making a decision to work with a director who you have been in awe of your entire life? >> well, technically speaking, a lot, because the script is really what it's supposed to be. tavis: polanski could have asked you to be in a piece of crap and you would have still said yes? how much did the script have to do with it? [

. >> we've got a question from mark riley. >> mr. president, i wanted to ask you about the other rising giant of our region, india. and the prime minister might have some comments. how significant is it for the u.s. that australia is considering sending uranium to india. what encouragement did your administration give to the administration. you're aware that our parliament has passed a new bill a carbon tax if you like, but we're intrigued about where america is going on this issue, and countries like australia don't see a carbon trading system in the world working unless america is a bill of big part of it. is it your wish that america will have an emissions trading scheme across the nation within the next five years or so? how heavily do you want to see america involved in an emissions trading scheme globally or has this become too politically hard for you? >> first of all, with respect to india, we have not had any influence, i suspect on australia's decision to explore what its relationship in terms of the peaceful use of nuclear

mr. galbraith? >> now d. riley and i are against mountain top removal. we need coal.coal is an essential in this state but mountain top removal is the most destructive method of destracting that coal. we've got to support a lot of the deep miners that they agree with us. it replaces miners and human beings with machines. destroys the earth and as a private property advocate my main concern is that it floods over into other people's private property and filling up valleys and destroying the streams. they talk about creating flat-tops up there for industry. only 10% of the land that's been flattened in eastern kentucky has any kind of utility or any kind of development on it what so ever so it may be that we're overselling the fact that we need flat land up there. i think that the law's in effect right now. on the books. forced to the maximum. i think if they had been might not have lost those 29 other miners in the other state and so against mountain top removal but not against coal. we think there are less destructive and more miner friendly ways of obtaining it and s

mr. president? president o'brien: yes, please. >> commissioner adams. >> aye. >> commissioner clyde. >> aye. >> commissioner dooley. >> aye. >> commissioner o'brien. >> aye. >> commissioner riley. >> aye. >> that motion passes 5-0. president o'brien: thank you. next item, please. >> thanks for all your work on this. >> commissioners, item seven, discussion of possible act to make recommendations to the board of supervisors on board of supervisors file number 11102, business and tax regulations code, payroll expense tax inclusion for compensation paid to individuals with a felony conviction. this is an ordinance amending the san francisco business tax regulations code. we have a presentation by supervisor mirkarimi, and in your packet is the file number and the legislative digest. this is the discussion of possible action. >> i thank you, honorable commissioners, and, again, thank you for the decision you rendered on the last item as well. and thank you to the department of environments and rob for his good work on this. so this piece of legislation is something i introduced not that long ago, but it comes as a result of almost about seven years as me being a supervisor working

mr. galbraith? >> now d. riley and i are against mountain top removal. we need coal. coal is an essential in this state but mountain top removal is the most destructive method of destracting that coal. we've got to support a lot of the deep miners that they agree with us. it replaces miners and human beings with machines. destroys the earth and as a private property advocate my main concern is that it floods over into other people's private property and filling up valleys and destroying the streams. they talk about creating flat-tops up there for industry. only 10% of the land that's been flattened in eastern kentucky has any kind of utility or any kind of development on it what so ever so it may be that we're overselling the fact that we need flat land up there. i think that the law's in effect right now. on the books. forced to the maximum. i think if they had been might not have lost those 29 other miners in the other state and so against mountain top removal but not against coal. we think there are less destructive and more miner friendly ways of obtaining it and

mr. richard hillman works at the u.s. government accountability of this. he is accompanied by the chief scientist for the gao. the witness on our second panel is lieutenant general patrick o'reilly. general riley is the director of the missile defense agency. our final panel is three witnesses. the vice president for supply chain operation at raytheon. the vice-president of corporate procurement at l3. and the vice president and the sudden program manager for boeing defense -- and the poseidon program manager for boeing defence. we appreciate our witnesses. this is an important part. all of the companies and agencies represented have cooperated with the committee's investigation. the companies and the industry here and our troops and their families, we are on the same side. the only people who benefit from cut it -- from counterfeits are people making money off of those. we have to end that you we have to end the attitude of the chinese who will not cooperate with the -- this investigation. we wrote the chinese ambassador last week and invited him to send a report it to testify. he declined. again, with my thanks. >> thank you for being here. this is a risk to national security. these cover it