mr. ritchie's report? >> from nancy and the recycle water program, and catherine howard. >> i am here to enthusiastically support the staff report in setting the recycled water plant. i would like to review a little history for you, so you feel as good about this as i do. in 1975, the voters overwhelmingly supported the position -- the decision to build a brand new sewage treatment plant and water treatment plant. they did this knowing it would take some of these inland away, but in regard to the importance of that, it was supported. one of the statement made in the conflict by the city was the administrative officer as was the mayor said, the existing treatment plant and golden gate park next to the windmill can be abandoned once the new plant south of the zoo is completed, and 5 acres of land and put back into park use. today is the day i am hearing that we're going honor what was told to the voters in 1975, to please let us return this park land. it doesn't look like a park in that particular 5 acres, b

mr. ritchie described. so, generally an overall modest change. in looking at the authorized positions, similarly pretty flat. look at the changes. not a lot to address their. here is my overall organizational structure. you see, from the boxes of activity, you can see where our operating funds are falling within the organization. you can see where the position loading is. notice the box on the extreme left. energy infrastructure planning and development is where we implement energy efficiency and the renewables project. not a lot of operating budget there for 21 positions, but that is where a large part of our capital program dollars go, with energy efficiency investments, renewables investments, including go solar. we are sticking with our focus for priorities on providing high-quality service, planning for the future, and meeting those green and sustainable objectives that we have been talking about in our climate action plan and our strategic sustainability plant and the various policy directives that we have discussed with you over the years.

mr. ritchie, had already been prepared with a bullet proof vest in his classroom, which he had put on andetting other students into the room as well. but i think everybody knew what they had to get done and did it as fast as they could. >> tell me a little bit about him. >> he was a quiet kid in the past like three years. back in middle school he was always really nice and funny. he was like one of us, one of the guys. he was a normal kid. and we all liked him. >> you know that, as you know, steve, is what you often hear in these kinds of cases. horrifying horrific tragedies. they seemed quiet, relatively nice. only later or even in court looking backwards do you start to recognize some warning signs. what do you look for in your students? >> well, one of the things you look for in regards to boys in particular is that they're withdrawn. boys can sometimes be quiet in middle and high school but withdrawn means that you just can't engage them. that's a telltale sign. another is in their writings. many of these children will on facebook and other social networks, they'll say some things tha