mr. rose. any question for mr. rose? can we accept without opposition? so moved. (gavel) up next do we have the sheriff's department here? sure, bree here from the sheriff's department. >> it's on. >> hi. supervisors good morning. i am prima horder, the cfo -- the sheriff is running down the hall to get here on time but we are in agreement and we would be happy to answer any questions that you may have and also have information regarding our supplemental request if you would like to hear it. >> supervisor farrell: mr. clerk could you please call item number one. >> supervisor farrell: okay, thanks. we you like to talk about item number one? >> yes. -- -- in the interest of time i will work off the prints on the powerpoint. as you can see on the first slide we are requesting to move about 460,000 from the salina salaries and 250,000 from dependent coverage to cover overtime. the reason we need to move is that we do have enough cash but we do not have sufficient budget allocation and this is in

we have a budget report from mr. rose. >> mr. chairman and members of the committee, on the bottom of page three of our report we say it's shown in table three, we submitted invoices. in addition they offer the contractor estimate expenditures of 266, 723 to complete the reconstruction work and the total project cost presently at 95,367 and on page 5 of our report we point out that given the significant delays of the 8 months prior to submitting this request to the board of supervisors, additional four months to submitting to the budget of supervisors and the subject emergency request for not to exceed 595 meeting the emergency and authorizing this contract award without undergoing the city as bidding process. we recommend that you do amend the proposed resolution to reduce the requested emergency authorization by 266723 to not exceed 395268. i would recommend -- the reason we're recommending those amount because those expenditures that been occurred and we ask you to see bids to the lowest response of bidder for the reconstructi

thank you mr. rose. colleagues any other questions for the department >> i'm sure they'll all go like this. colleagues can i have a motion >> so moved. >> okay. so moved. we have our planning department welcome back >> good morning john ram with the planning department. we are in agreement that there would be i think the number $360,000 in cuts. i also just wanted to mention the policy issue that was placed the budget analyst report. we're taking the steps to have you approve the numbers of positions that are not funded to allow the flexibility in the coming budget noois the money does come in. it would allow us to hire people more quickly coming presumably if the funds don't come in. that is the intent of doing that it's our experience that the hiring can take 6 months that gets us favor behind >> any questions. >> mr. rose our report please. mr. chairman and members of the committee own page 20 our recommended reductions are 229 and in fourteen, 15 our recommend reductions are 369. >> any comments? >>

mr. rose? >> i want to thank budget analyst's office for working with our office diligently. >> supervisor farrell: colleagues, can i have a motion to accept the budget recommendation on the sheriff's budget. (gavel) we do need to take public comment on this item. if there is someone on the public that would like to comment step forward. public comment is closed. can have a motion? can we do so without opposition (gavel) so moved. up next, the treasurer tax collector. mr. cisneros. >> good morning supervisors, jose cisneros, seven cisco treasurer tax collector. >> supervisor farrell: any questions for the treasurer? mr. rose can we go to the updated budget report. >> page 57 of the report, our recommendations in 13-14 would result in 459,184 on your page you have a number of 559,568, our revised recommendation is 459,184, the city's general fund. in 13-14, are new reductions are 34,849, instead of the 79,727. those are our recommendations. >> supervisor farrell: any questions for mr. rose or o

we have a budget analyst report, mr. rose? >> mr. chairman, members of the committee, on page 22 of our report, we note that the puc is requesting to enter into four separate agreements, each for a not to exceed $5 million total of up to $20 million. currently the puc is expending approximately $500,000 annually for professional services to assist in the monitoring and

mr. rose and your updated report. -- >> mr. chairman, numbers of the committee on page 74 of the report, recommended reductions are -- and for 14-15 total 269,256. >> we want to clarify in our recommendation that 350,000 of the recommendation is a general fund reduction. the balance is the children's fund reduction available for reappropriation, of the children fund's program. >> supervisor farrell: -- supervisor breed? >> supervisor breed: for clarity, so the city grant program, is that the children fund's reduction here? hone for 250,000 another for 150,000? >> that's the general fund reduction. >> supervisor farrell: mr. rose would you like to give us more specificity? >> those are general fund recommendations, the 350,000 but we are referring to which the department agrees with. >> supervisor farrell: any questions or comments? to have a motion to approve the budget analyst recommendations? okay. supervisor breed, can we do that without opposition? so moved. (gavel) thank you. we have the

i think that mr. rose rightly pointed out that the last year at this time or roll forward approximately six dollars and that reserve to the current year budget. the purpose for that carry forward was to pay for the expiration of furlough days in the police department in the current budget that were not explicitly in the police department so we had a very explicit use. >> supervisor breed: we are proposing to take what we will put into this reserve and utilize that basically to potentially utilize that through this current budget process, is that correct? >> that is correct. >> if i can respond, yes. we can choose not to and maybe we don't have to come up with an agreement with the mayor's office, -- to fulfill the priorities that we are trying to achieve at the boarded the the mayor with the next couple of days and to answer your other question, we can choose to suspend a portion of the 60 million dollars before the budget stabilization reserve, maybe suspend half of it and maybe still make a deposit, sign

mr. rose would you like to give us more specificity? >> those are general fund recommendations, the 350,000 but we are referring to which the department agrees with. >> supervisor farrell: any questions or comments? to have a motion to approve the budget analyst recommendations? okay. supervisor breed, can we do that without opposition? so moved. (gavel) thank you. we have the department of public health here, barbara garcia, greg wagne and team. >> good morning. chair farrell and supervisors. -- garcia supervisor of health. after we worked with the budget analyst's office we are ready to say we are in agreement today. >> supervisor farrell: thank you ms. garcia. mr. rose wonder we go to the updated dp report. >> on page 83, for 13-14 recommended reductions are 1,139,136, and in 14-15 1,213,260 which is that -- those are again general fund reductions. >> supervisor farrell: thank you mr. rose. any questions for mr. rose or ms. garcia or anyone else at dph? supervisor mar. >> supervisor mar: ms

mr. rose? >> mr. chairman, members of the committee. chief, is correct, on page 16 of our report, where we had a total including the unspended and the recommend now is to reduce the amount by $703,648, and in fiscal year, 1415, where we had previously reported 869,751, we recommend that you reduce the budget by 508,008. >> okay. >> and colleagues any questions for mr. rose or the chief? >> okay. seeing none, could i have a motion to set the budget analyst recommendations. so moved and we could do that without opposition. >> thank you, thank you, chief. >> thank you. >> oh, and excuse me, hold on, actually. and item number two we need to take public comment on? >> correct. >> yes. if there is any members of the public that would like to comment. could i have a motion to move forward to the full board with recommendation. >> we can do so without opposition. >> i am going dao fast here. >> is that the fire department supplemental? >> correct. >> and yes, as i understand it, the department has concured with our recommended reduction of 19,8

we have a budget analyst report, mr. rose? >> mr. chairman, members of the committee, on page 22 of our report, we note that the puc is requesting to enter into four separate agreements, each for a not to exceed $5 million total of up to $20 million. currently the puc is expending approximately $500,000 annually for professional services to assist in the monitoring and managing the necessary environmental work as described. the average hourly rates currently range from $85, $465. with the completion of the water system improvement program, such monitoring and management requirements are proposed to increase to approximately 1.5 million to 1.8 million annually for the first seven years to approximately 2013 to 2020 for a total cost of approximately $10.5 million to 12.6 million through 2020. i would note that the total not to exceed 20 million for the four contracts over a 14-year period is an estimate and cannot be specifically calculated per year or contract. we recommend that you approve the proposed resolution. >> thank you, mr. r

mr. rose. >> mr. chairman, members of the committee regarding item five mr. chairman pertaining to the various patient rates we do recommend that you approve that proposed ordinance. again we would note that the dph budget is balanced based on the assumption that the board of supervisors does approve the patient rates. our recommended reductions, and this is on page 47, total is listed there in 13-14. that amount 2.4 million is on going savings and we have one time savings. those reductions would still allow increase of $228 million or 13.7% in the department in the 14-14 budget. we recommend closing out also prior year unspended fund encumbrances and allow money to be returned to the general fund and result in savings listed. 2.5 million on the city's general fund and our recommended reductions total this amount and $290,000 are on going savings and $117,000 are one time and would still allow increase here or 2.2% in the 14-15 budget. let me make a comment in general mr. chairman. first of all the department has suggested that they could agree to a lesser am

seeing none we will move to the budget analyst report, mr. rose? >> mr. chairman, and members of the committee, it is shown on table two, and table three, both of those tables are on page 24 of the report and the proposed rent of 13 dollars and 31 cents per month exceed the rent and per square foot per month for the other two leased retail spaces for the garage, and we recommend that you approve this resolution. >> okay, thank you very much. >> any questions for mr. rose. >> thank you very much and we will open it up to public comment, my guess is that there is no one here for that, seeing none, public comment is closed. >> and where is walter? >> and colleagues, we have this lease to approve and could i have a motion to approve? >> so moved. >> we can do that without objection. >> mr. clerk, could you call item six? >> resolution authorizing the department of public works to retroactively accept and expend a federal grant in the amount of $3.5 million from the federal highway administration for the islais creek bridge rehab project. >> we have ray here f

mr. rose do you want to go to your report. >> mr. chairman and members of the committee open page 73 for 13 and fourteen the reductions are ongoing savings. it would allow on a increase of 3.8 percent in the 13 and fourteen budget. all of which are ongoing savings and allowing at about increase of 2.57 percent in 2014 and 15 budget >> thank you, mr. rose we have an agreement. colleagues any questions? >> okay - what's that. >> can we have a motion to approve the motion. thank you for being here >> all right. >> as with all departments that are no, we have no dispute with you have no need to come back next week. we'll move along to the mayor's office. please do. >> item number 12 remove certainty observations of the hotel tax and remove obsolete items. and this is regarding the quantifies of charities. >> good afternoon supervisors. kate howard. i'm here with the deputy demeanor of the mayor's office with housing and community development. and brian two from the community development and mo h cd. as you know the mayor's office represe

>> we have to hear from mr. rose first. >> great thanks. mr. rose do you want to give your report. >> mr. chair, members of the committee our recommendations total 580 in 13-14 and on going and 350,000 and savings to the general fund. they would allow the next listed here or 16-point 3% in the 13-14 budget. the total recommended budgets are listed here in 14-15, all of which are on going savings. these would result in $350,000 savings to the city's general fund in 14-15. >> and ms. sue are you in agreement or still discuss something. >> we are still discussing. >> okay. colleagues any questions for mr. rose? ms. sue? all right. we

so, we are in agreement with mr. rose and i'm happy to answer any questions that you have. >> colleagues, questions? okay, mr. rose, we'll hear your report. >> mr. chairman, members. committee, on page 75 of our reports as the department just stated, our recommended reduction is totaled 400,000 in 13-14 which are ongoing and again 400,000 in 14-15. as i understand it, the department concurs with our recommendations. >> okay, thank you, mr. rose. colleagues, any questions for mr. rose at this time? again, just to confirm you are in agreement with those? >> yes. >> okay. can can i have a motion to accept the budget analyst recommendations? we can do so without opposition. [gavel] >> okay, so moved. thank you for being here. up next we have the sheriff's department, sheriff mirkarimi in brief. >> good afternoon, supervisors. we introduced to you our chief financial officer, brae maharder. aaron brin will also be in the audience again. i want to thank the mayor's budget office, melissa howard in particular, and the budget ana

we have a budget analyst report from mr. rose. >> mr. chairman, members of the committee, on page 7 of the report, we point out that as shown in table 1, and that's on page 6, without the 5% annual cap on payment increases for the proposed feeder agreement, payments would increase approximately 6% annually and result in a total of 33.3 million in payments to bart to sfmta as an increase of $1,197,0 93 of the term of the proposed payment with the 5% cap in place. we believe the 5% cap is reasonable despite we would be getting the sfmta would be getting less money. but there is currently no floor on how much the annual payments by bart to sfmta could decrease over the 10 year term, so we believe it would be reasonable to include such a floor. and as i understand from what mr. reiskin stated, the department concurs with us on that point. on page 8 of our report, as shown in table 3, based on the estimated payments for both the proposed fast pass and feeder agreements, sfmta would pay an estimated 26.4 million in total net payments to bart f

mr. rose, i believe you have a report on item number two. >> mr. rose: mr. chairman the numbers of the committee on page 14-15 of the report we have an analysis of this request for reallocation for overtime as i understand it the chief concurs with our recommended reduction of 19,894 from 466,248 to 446,354. and we recommend that be approved as amended. >> supervisor farrell: chief, are you okay with a reduction? >> yes. >> mr. rose: on page 16 of the report recommended reduction in 13-14 wold result in a savings of -- and in 14-15 recommended savings would result in 869,751. the recommended salary savings are less than one third of one percent of the salary budget of 219 million dollars. >> if i could ask for education those are the numbers that i have in terms of the final recommend a reduction from your office, sir. i have the final commendation from your office as 987,202 in 13-14. >> mr. rose: that is correct. there's 15,539 of unexpended encumbrances, when you add that number that you me

>> mr. rose we're going to go to our budget analyst and a members i would note on page 15 of our report the report that america's cup organizes committee there's expenditures for the america's cup but the detailed expenditure budget provided to the budget and legislative analyst office is 70 million 56009. there will be an appropriate reduction but there's a discrepancy in the budget right now >> could you highlight that it's on the page. the proposed budget includes $10 million from the america's cup organizing committee but i'm referred e refer to expenditures of 9 million plus. the detailed expenditure budget put to the budget office is not that 9 million 175 but rather 7 million plus. to support that 9 million is not there are. our understanding is the mayor's office will be reducing the budget for the discrepancy that's included in the budget and the details of 7 million plus. again we've report to you back next week. with respect to our recommended reductions on page 17 of our report. our r

mr. rose? >> yes, mr. chairman, members of the committee. on page 4 of our report, we point out that as shown on table 3, this request would increase the port's capital project appropriation by a little over $3 million, specifically $3,0 57,524 to [speaker not understood]. and those projects are included in the port's capital plan. we concur with the port's request on both -- on the capital projects. the debt service that is being requested as well as the 7 off line or off budgeted amendments. we hope you would approve this ordinance. we would be happy to respond to questions. >> thank you, mr. rose. colleagues, any question? seeing none, we'll open this to public comment. if anybody wish toes comment on items 2 or 3 step forward. seeing none, public comment is closed. [gavel] >> kiloton, can i ask for a motion to a move these forward to [speaker not understood]? motion by supervisor avalos. can we do that without objection? [gavel] >> so moved. thank you very much. mr. clerk, can you please c

seeing none, we have a budget analyst report, mr. rose? >> mr. chairman, members of the committee, on page 29 of our report, we report that as shown in table 4, the total estimated lease and related costs for the nibble five-year term of the lease would be $4,6 30,0 06 which would all be general fund v tours subject to appropriation approval by the board of supervisors. ~ the law library's rent utilities costs are 5 77,3 72 and 13-14 of the proposed lease are $386,94 1 or approximately 203% more than the 13 occupancy fee paid by the law library to the war memorial of [speaker not understood]. on page 30 of our report we note that the 20,000 square footage is an increase of approximately 7,000 [speaker not understood] net square feet of 56% more than the law library's existing space of 12,8 16 square feet. and, mr. chairman, with respect to your increase, our report states based on information provided that the law library outlined several conditions, including that the city complete layout designs and plans for tenant improvements at 1145 market.

okay, why don't we go to our budget analyst report from mr. rose. >> mr. chairman and members of the committee, i would point out on page 28 of our report we have commented on file 1305 39, that's item 5 on your calendar. this ordinance would revise various fees as shown on page 28 of our report. we recommend that you approve that ordinance. and on the other related legislation, file 1305 44 on page 29, that's item 6, we also comment on that ordinance which establishes, as the librarian has mentioned, a public library gift fund. we do recommend that you amend the ordinance to require board of supervisors approval by resolution of donations in the cash or market value of $100,000 or more, and the lepa provision excluded grants to the librarian from nonprofit organizations from the requirement that the board of supervisors approve by resolution the acceptance and expenditure of such grants of $100,000 or more. and we recommend that you approve the ordinance as amended. and then on the budget recommendations on page 30 of our report, our recommended reduction