mr. rose, can we go to your report, please, for dpw? >> yes, mr. chairman, members of the committee. on page 41 of our report, our recommended reductions for proposed budget total 536,0 56 in 14-15. of that amount, 265,2 41 are ongoing and 270 are one-time savings. these reductionses would still allow an increase of 58.5 million or 36.7% for the department's 15-16 budget. we also recommend closing out prior year general fund expended encumbrances, which would allow the return of [speaker not understood]. mr. chairman, if you look at the next paragraphs, those numbers don't add up to what the general fund is because it's only a portion that is general fund cut. so, together those recommendations will result in 363,746 savings to the city's general fund. i just wanted to point out to the committee in case they added it up, if it doesn't add up to that amount. our recommended reductions to the proposed budget total 86 6,6 81 in 15-16. of that amount 298,0 78 are ongoing. 5 63 are one time. these reductions would still allow an increase of 12.1 million

mr. rose, could we go to the revised report. >> yes, mr. chairman and members of the committee on page 6 of the report, recommended of the reduction, 323,757, of that amount, savings and reductions still allow an increase of 8 million dollars, or 27, 283,195, and of that amount, the department incurs with the recommended reductions on page 7 and 8 of the report. >> any questions for mr. rose or for mr. m? >> okay, do we have a motion, supervisor mar and breed? could i have a motion to accept the recommendations? >> the motion that you can take that without objection? >> thank you very much. >> okay. and up next, we have the district attorney's office. >> good morning, share ferrill, and supervisors, kristine, standing in for the district attorney. we have reached agreement with the budget analyst on their proposed cuts, and happy to answer any questions, if you have any. >> okay, thank you, mr. beary, if no more questions, why don't we go to your report mr. rose. >> on page 13 of our report, i recommended reductions to the proposed budget,

we recommend that you approve this resolution. >> okay, thank you, mr. rose. no other question, we'll open this up to public comment. anybody wish to comment on item 15? seeing none, public comment is closed. [gavel] >> supervisor mar? >> yeah, i just wanted to thank mr. grasielli, the chief operating officer for the school district. i know the ten years i was on the school board, the cleaning up of the fiscal health of the school district really it's like night and day compared to 10, 15 years ago in the school district. but i think this is a great way be -- approving this is a great way to continue that amazing partnership between the city and the school district. >> thank you, supervisor mar. could i have a motion to send this item forward? >> so moved. >> we can take it without objection. [gavel] >> madam clerk, can you call item 16, please? >> item 16, resolution authorizing the department of public health to submit an application to the metropolitan transportation commission for up to $990,000 in the active transportation program. >> good morning, supervi

mr. rose, can we go to your report? >> yes, mr. chairman. our recommendation is on page 36 of our report and based on discussions with the department of public health we do have a couple of revisionses to our recommendations which i will enunciate now. again, based on the expenditure data submitted by the department of public health, we recommend that you amend the proposed resolution to amend the not to exceed contract for children youth and families by 915,175 [speaker not understood] to the recommended 19,90 4.52 and adults by 53 3,554 from the requested 23 million 135,605 to the recommended 22 million 60 20 62. the total recommended reduction and the not to exceed contract amount is a million 4 48,718. we requested [speaker not understood] to the recommended, and this is the first, supervisor, instead of [speaker not understood] it should state 42,506 instead of 516, 5 14. and then in the second recommendation we recommend that you amend the proposed resolution, page 1 lines 14 through 17 to correctly state that the contract amounts are

okay mr. rose. >> yes mr. chairman, members of the committee on page 53 of our report our recommended reductions to the proposed budget total 582,536 and we have on going savings. and we have one time savings. these reductions would allow increase of 6,234,484 or 9% in the departments of 14-15 budget. the reductions recommend 174,801 in 15-16 and we have on going savings and we have one time savings. these would allow an increase of nine /10 of a percent in the budget and as the director stated we are working with the department and will report back next week. >> okay. thank you mr. rose. colleagues any questions? okay. thanks we will see you next wednesday. >> thank you very much. >> thank you everyone. we will go into recess until 145. we will see you then. [gavel] >> we're at our regularly scheduled meeting for wednesday, june 18, 2014. we are in the middle of hearing items 1 and 2 for the 2014, 15, 16 budget. we'll pick it up. up next is our public offender and we have mr. adachi here and we'll get moving.

mr. rose, why don't we go to your report. >> mr. chairman and members of the committee. just to put this budget into perspective, the public defender is requesting a budget of $30 million. the budget analyst has recommended total recommended reductions of $75,000. our recommendation to increase salary savings by $55,000 is very conservative. it has given the public defender more than what he needs. if he can provide us documentation with two other recommendations, but based upon what we've seen, our recommendations is conservative. you can't calculate the percentage of this reduction to the $30 million budget request. so the fact that the public defender is agreeing with a couple of our recommendations doesn't mean a thing to me. anyway, mr. chairman and members of the committee, on page 68 of our report, our recommended reduction to the proposed budget totaling $75,000 in 2014-15, those are all ongoing savings and will increase $2014-15, those are all ongoing savings and will increase an increase of $1.58 million or 5.4 percent reduction. the total budget is -- $73,000

mr. rose, can we go to your updated report, please? >> yes, mr. chairman, members of the committee. on page 5 of our report we report that our recommended reductionses to the proposed budget total $165,83 1 in 14-15. all of that amount are ongoing savings. these reductions would still allow an increase with 4,760,387 or 13.6% and the department's 15-16 working budget. we also recommend closing out prior year unexpended general fund encumbrances which would amount to [speaker not understood]. together those recommendations result in 255,7 81 savedles to the city's general fund in 14-15. our recommended reductionses to the proposed budget total 199,340 in the 14-15-16. you will amendment, [speaker not understood] recommended reductions are ongoing savings. as the department has indicated as we understand it, they are in concurrence with our recommended reductions which are on page 7 of our report. >> thank you, mr. rose. actually 6 and 7. >> colleagues, any questions for mr. rose or for mr. cisneros? okay, thanks very much for being here. >> thank you. up next we have our public defen

mr. rose, can we get your report. >> on page 77 of our report, our recommended reductions to the proposed budget totalled -- of that amount, 585, 859 are savings and the other is one time savings. this would allow an increase of $3,239 or 7.2 percent in the department -- our total is 639, 963 in 15-16 and of that amount, 574 are ongoing savings. these reductions would allow an increase of $4 million. or 2.3 percent in the department 15-16 budget. we're work with the sheriff and we'll report back to the committee next week. >> okay. thank you. supervisor breed. >> i do have a question. sheriff, do you -- can you tell me what's happened since last year. i know there was a need for mental health services before the ma population and the jail, and can you explain to me what has changed because it doesn't appear to be something you're asking for for this fiscal year. >> i was going for more because i feel this is a population that merits more attention than i think the city is giving them. and we r

mr. rose, we'll go to your report, please. >> mr. chairman, member of the committee, a shown in table 2 on page 8 of our report, dph will pay empress between 7 million 9 47 069 dollars to 8 million [speaker not understood]. that's over the course of the first year lease extension. we recommend that you approve the resolution. >> okay, thank you very much ~. no questions, we'll open this up to public comment. anybody wish to comment on aye item number 2? you don't have to raise your hand. please just come on up for public comment. >>> [speaker not understood] public comment. in doing this structure wise, [speaker not understood]. [speaker not understood]. historical tradition of [speaker not understood] city beautiful forever for you. >> thank you. anybody else wish to speak in public comment on item number 2? seeing none, public comment is closed. [gavel] >> motion to send this item forward? >> yes, i recommend we move approval for the extension of the lease for the empress hotel. >> thank you. we can take that motion without objecti

mr. rose... >> mr. chairman and members of the committee, supervisor avalos, i don't believe that we have a recommended reduction in our report

okay, mr. rose, can we move to your report, please? >> mr. chairman, members of the committee, on page 61 of our report, recommended reductions to the proposed budget total 296,4 36 n. 14-15 of that amount 1 million 850 and $10 dollars ongoing savings 246,000 for 26 or one-time savings. these reductions would still allow an increase of 9 46,335 or 2/10 of a percent in the department's working 15-16 budget. i recommended reductions to the proposed budget for 1 million 727,154 in 15-16. that of amount 1 million 586,652 are ongoing savings and 146,5 02 are ongoing saving. [speaker not understood] 4/10 of a percent in the department's 15-16 budget. as the chief has indicated, we are still working with the department and we will report back next week to the committee. >> okay, thank you, mr. rose. colleagues, any further questions for mr. rose, chief at this point? anything else? >> no, just -- i would agree with the budget analyst. we appreciate spirit of cooperation. we'll figure it out. >> okay, see you back next week. >> thank you. >> all righ

mr. rose... >> mr. chairman and members of the committee, supervisor avalos, i don't believe that we have a recommended reduction in our report. and that you are referring to. >> okay. >> thank you. >> and just, if i could, supervisor avalos,

mr. rose's report? >> okay. mr. rose are there any other underlying items for dph or hsa that you would like to comment on? >> i commented on the 3dph items. excuse me. yes, i'm sorry, mr. chairman, item 5. let me go back to that. thank you for reminding me of that. on page 59 of our report, this is the expenditure plan for the human services care fund. to make a long story short on that one, we absolutely recommend that you approve that resolution. >> okay. thank you. okay. colleagues, any further questions for mr. rose, otherwise we are going to spring him from his duties to finish the report for monday. okay. why don't we start with dph, ms. garcia and team, thank you for waiting. >> good afternoon, supervisors and chair farrell. just to comment on this last bit of conversation. i totally appreciate the conversation going on. we not only had the issue of vacancies in our department particular in our hr department. time is an essence at this department as we higher and we'll be cooperative with mr. rose to ensure t

. >> mr. rose why don't we go to your report please. >> mr. chairman and members of the committee on page 45 of our report our recommended reduction to the proposed budget are listed for 14-15 and we have ongoing savings and we have one time savings and reductions would allow a reduction of 2.9% in the fiscal year budget. our recommended reduction to processed total is listed for 15-16. of that amount -- all of the 906518 is on going savings and the reduced are listed and.3% less than the mayor's office proposed budget. we are working with the department and will report back next week on the recommendations. >> thank you mr. rose. any further questions to mr. rose and the fire department? okay. thank you. we will see you next wednesday. let's get dm through before we break for lunch here. >> chair farrell, members of the budget and finance committee thank you for squeezing us in before the lunch break. i am the director of emergency management. as you know the departme emergency -- as you know the department of emergency management -- could yo

mr. rose, why don't we jump right to your report. >> yes, mr. chairman, supervisor mar. on page 55, table 3 shows the expenditures to date and the budget with parsons total project budget as ms. wagoner just stated is $14,700,000. we recommend that you approve the resolution. >> thank you, mr. rose. why don't we open this item up to public comment. anybody wishing to comment on item 14? [gavel] he >> move approval. >> so moved. [gavel] >> madam clerk, would you call item 15? >> item 15, resolution retroactively approving a lease agreement with san francisco unified school district of real property at 1235 mission street for the human services agency, at an initial rate of $216,014.33 per month for a term of 11 years and 10 months from july 1, 2014, through april 30, 2026. >> great. welcome back, mr. updike. >> thank you, chair farrell. director updike, director of real estate. this particular project was in city scape by john king this spring and i thought i'd take the opportunity to use that visual for you. it's a very cool building. and the architecture has been descri

mr. rose? >> yes, mr. chairman and members of the committee. on page 23 of our report, our recommended reductions to the proposed budget total 302,973 dollars in 14-15. all of that amount are ongoing savings. these reductions would still allow an increase of 4 million 6 23,245 dollars or 13.2% in the department's fiscal year 14-15 budget. we also recommend closing our prior year unexpended general fund encumbrances which would allow [speaker not understood]. together those recommendations will result in $392,9 23 saving to the city's general fund in 14-15 ~. i recommend reduction to the proposed budget total 341 18 in 14, 15 all that of are ongoing saving. these reduction would decrease the department's 15-16 budget by 2 million 578,6 14 or 6.4%. we're still working with the department and will report back to the committee next week. >> thank you, mr. cisneros. the next department is economic development and workforce development. oewd. and we have todd ruffo. thank you, mr. ruffo. whenever you're ready, mr. ruffo, go ahead. >> thank you, super

seeing no other questions, mr. rose, can we get your report, please? >> yes, mr. chairman and supervisor mar. a budget for the city's total estimated cost to purchase and develop the property and that budget is 253,285,0 80 dollars and that is shown in table 3 on page 78 of our report ~. on page 78 we also note, a mr. updike ha already stated, that this legislation would authorize nonrefundable payment of the city $1 million toward land acquisition costs and up to 250,000 for initial schematic design costs. on page 81, we have our recommendations. we recommend that you amend the proposed resolution [speaker not understood] prior to the date the board of supervisors must endorse the purchase and sale agreement on october 31st, 2014. and that report should provide details on the space requirements of the city debtsv and the proposed uses such as training board room, space for occupying the new office building, including long term staffing [speaker not understood], also explain the option for big filling [speaker not understood] allowing them to relocate to the new o

and his team a chance to speak >> mr. rose. >> that mr. rose. >> mr. president, and supervisors on page 4 of our report we recommended based on the budget simpleminded by the department of public health we recommend you, you reduce this contract not to exceed by 76 thousand plus from a request of 14 million to 14 million plus and we recommend that you approve this resolution as amended. >> with that, supervisor farrell. >> and mr. rose i said the department of public health is in agreement with this recommendation. >> so we'll make a motion to amend this as the budget analyst. >> supervisor farrell has made a motion to adapt the budget analyst recommendation without objection and on the underlying resolution take a roll call vote on the resolution as amended. >> on item 50. >> supervisor mar. supervisor tang. supervisor wiener. supervisor yee. supervisor avalos. supervisor avalos? supervisor breed. supervisor campos. supervisor chiu. supervisor malia cohen. supervisor farrell. supervisor kim there 11 i's. the resolution is adapted as amended and with t

okay, mr. rose, can we go to your report, please? >> yes, mr. chairman, and members of the committee. on page 29 of our report i recommended reduction to the proposed budget total $234,6 49. in 2014-2015 ongoing saving. [speaker not understood] 240,7 34 in 15-16, all of which are ongoing saving ~. and as i understand it, the department concurs with our recommended reductions. >> thank you very much, colleague, any questions for mr. rose or mr. ruffo? okay, thanks so much. see you next week. >> chair farrell, i wanted to thank supervisor mar for especially the invested neighborhood programs and honing it down for each of the different unique neighborhoods you serve. i wanted to thank holley long, [speaker not understood] jordan kline and the great staff you have as well. thank you so much for the healthy retail s.f. program. it really helped so many small businesses transform into healthier businesses and especially in lower income neighborhoods. and we've seen a tremendous demand. we really appreciate that program as well, so, thank you. >> than

okay, mr. rose, can we go to your report, please? >> yes, mr. chairman and members of the committee. on page 5 of our report we report that our recommended reductions for the proposed budget total 392,467 in 14-15. of that amount [speaker not understood] are ongoing. savings and 202,7 36 are one-time savings. these reductions would still allow an increase of 1,667 [speaker not understood]. 251,0 77 of 15-16. of that amount 176,000 or $20 or ongoing savings. 75,149 one time savings. these reductions would still allow an increase of [speaker not understood] or .1/10 of a percent of the department's 15-16 budget. i would note we have a policy consideration for the supervisors also on the bottom of page 5 in fiscal year 15-16. the department is requesting designate nine positions that were previously approved by the board of supervisors, limited term tort department, domestic violence ordinance 32-13 with a termination date of june 30, 2015 permanent position. they want to go from limited to permanent. [speaker not understood] due to the increase in

. >> okay, thank you, mr. rose. mr. updike, is your department okay with these proposed recommendations? >> yes, we are. >> okay. if no other questions at this time, we'll open this up to public comment. if anybody wishes to comment on item number 26? seeing none, public comment is closed. [gavel] >> supervisor mar, we have our budget analyst recommendation. he >> so move the recommendations by the budget analyst. >> take the underlying objection. ~ gov. >> thank you very much. madam clerk, can you call our 10:30 special meeting? >> item number 1, resolution did he nating central city extra to be the neighborhood outreach newspaper of the city and county for the central city neighborhood; northside publications/marina times to be the neighborhood outreach knew paper of the city and county for the northern san francisco neighborhood; west portal monthly to be the neighborhood outreach newspaper of the city and county for the west portal neighborhood; and potrero view to be the neighborhood outreach knew paper of the city