mr. rosenberg, what is your groups view on the new policy? >> we opposed it. we think that the right way to think about what google did in terms of the change and service, in other words, before march 1, google had different terms of service for each of their products. if you were using e-mail, it collected your personal information to provide e-mail service. if you were using youtube, it collected your information to provide youtube service. the google wanted to do combine that information from its different products, and so as of march 1, the terms of service were going to change. they would combine all the data, they did not give people a choice. they could essentially stop you from googling. we objected, as do many others. >> what is the damage that could be done to a user? >> in the first instance, there is genuine concern about the companies commitment to users -- the company's commitment to the privacy of users. those privacy policies are collected in the terms of service, essentially, is what users rely on when they select a service. if they choose gma