mr. rosenfeld? >> we're reserving the value of the january class in year two, as i understand, so we'll calculate the cost of that and place that amount in reserve. >> supervisor cohen: yes. i'm sorry, was there a second on that motion? okay. well, then, the motion fails. [ gavel ]. >> supervisor cohen: someone else make the motion. >> supervisor fewer: no, i was just going to say that i think supervisor yee was going to propose a motion. >> supervisor yee: yeah, i think it was my original thought, and i'll -- i guess my compromise would be that i'll -- i won't disturb the first year's class, and to actually put -- reduce the amount for the budget on the second year to the cost of the academy class cost, and, again, i want to reity -- reiterate that after the study there shows that hardly anyone can be civilianized, i would go in the next year to support to put it back in. >> supervisor cohen: so would you please succinctly restate your motion. mr. rosenfeld? >> i understand that motion, supervisor,

mr. rosenfeld, do i put this in the form of motion? how do i move forward? >> i think you would be accepting the budget analyst's recommendation for funding on this item but permitting the position authority. that would be a motion that we would understand from the committee and we'll make sure it gets in the system that way. >> supervisor cohen: i want to make sure that reflects accurately in your notes that you're taking. great. to the budget legislative analyst office. you have remarks? >> you want me to summarize the recommendation? >> supervisor cohen: please. we'll continue for the next one. >> for the recreation park department, we recommend reduction for $1,024,489 in fiscal 18-19. it allow increase fiscal year 18-19. recommends closing out prior year $56,749 for total general fund savings $996,000. also with the policy recommendations, we understand that the department is prepared to accept our policy recommendation to delete one replacement for 250 extended cab. are little to accept the savings reduction for the upward substitution of the policy re

mr. rosenfeld, if i'm not mistaken, we need to make some action on just the basis of the b.l.a.'s recommendation. all right. i'll make that motion. supervisor sheehy's seconding it, and without objection. okay. h.s.h., jeff kositsky. all right. so jeff, welcome back to the chambers. nice to see you, and your department is in agreement with the budget legislative analyst's recommendation. >> that is correct. >> supervisor cohen: and wanted to just bring you back to see if there's any -- anything last-minute that you wanted to discuss. i think my colleagues have a couple questions, as well for you. >> we have nothing to discuss. >> supervisor cohen: nothing to discuss. okay. let me look to the b.l.a. mr. b.l.a.? >> yes. supervisors, we put out a revised just to correct one number. so our recommended reductions, of the 425,349 in recommended reductions, 619896 are ongoing, and 364,180 are one time. in addition, we recommend closing out prior unextended encumbrances of $375,000, and we recommend putting 390,225 on budget and finance reserve. the total savings would be 1.1 million, an

mr. rosenfeld? >> if i could briefly summarize to make sure i understand and we have our notes correct. i believe, and the department is agreing to accept the budget and legislative analyst reserve recommendations. >> yes. >> you have already accepted all of the general fund reductions at the previous meeting for the city administrator. additionally for the department of real estate, we -- the motion would delay the timing of the 0933 position to .77 f.t.e. in the department of -- in the cannabis office, it would permit the 1823 substitution. however, it would offset it with a comparable general fund attrition adjustment to pay for it. i understand the committee would be accepting the proposed deletion of an 1822 and risk management. and then lastly you would be rejecting the policy recommendation regarding the 09322 position for transgender advocacy. >> you said rejecting? is that what you said? >> that's what i understood. >> that is what i said. so, that is -- that is exactly what i said. and there are two points on that that i'm open to talking about. and that is the upward substitu

mr. rosenfeld? i'm sorry. i thought i caught you shaking your head no. >> no, no, no: you've articulated the discussion while here at the committee. the committee couldic ma the reduction to year two, and then entertain the possibility of restoring a class in year two next year, that will require you to identify another 6 to $7 million for a midyear class at that point, or i think what supervisor yee has suggested, what you've suggested, leaving the money in the budget, and if you felt the class wasn't needed, you could reprogram the money at the time the budget is in front of you next year. again it's a choice for the committee. >> supervisor yee: i actually did not say that. >> supervisor cohen: i know. i said that. i know, and when you resaid it, it sounded like a good idea. all right. -- all right. let's take it from the top. i'm going to try to -- i want to put together kind of where we are today. it sounds like i'm going to be leaning into supporting for a second -- supporting the second year funding for