. >> so, mr. rossi, i hate to throw this at you. you can come up with the same answer. on the issue of the precautionary issue, i have a sense this is going to come up again and again and again. how do we get a reading on this so that the public has some comfort about is there a precautionary principle number one, what is the theory behind it, what is the impact of that on cases like this. can we move forward on that or have you done some further research? >> i think i answered the question at one of the meetings on these prior permits. article 25 limits the board's review of these permits to compliance with article 25. it's not the broader review that you have under other kinds of permits. article 25 provides that the standard is set by the federal comooucketss commission. so themunications commission. so the city can't create their own. this ordinance does not place any binding obligation on you as a board to create anything that you believe violates that principle. >> we found that those of you who attended our hearing before, the aforementioned article 25 was really