mr. rothman: ok. how long does did that situation exist? mr. reynolds: i would have to check, but i believe it's been many, many years that they've been in service. long serving deputy. maybe more than 10 years. roth rog ok. i will give you another general question and this to me is just more evidence why no matter how tempting it may seem to my colleagues younever ever, ever want the government to do anything more than they have o. mr. healy -- one more question for mr. reynolds. you said that you never knew since you were the head of hr anybody being fired for sexual harassment, right? you couldn't remember that? mr. reynolds: yeah, i'm going to follow up with the chairman on the date of it. it didn't hit -- i was managing systems and processes. mr. rothman: how long were you head of h.r.? mr. reynolds: two years. mr. rothman: two years. how many people did you have under you? mr. reynolds: about 18,000 permanents, upwards of 20,000 by the time the seasons come in. mr. rothman: you were the head of h

mr. rothman: thank you -- mr. rothfus: thank you, mr. chairman. i rise today in strong support of the iranian leadership transparency act. while every day iranians earn around $15,000 a year, corruption pervades the highest levels of the iranian government, where bad actors use their wealth and positions of power to fund terrorism and to advance their own interests. the wealthiest and most powerful of the iranian elites, including members of the islamic revolutionary guard corps, and the foundations they run control an estimated 1/3 of the nation's total economy. while president obama and his administration have engaged in negotiates with iran's leadership under the -- negotiations with iran's leadership under the delusional pretext that they are in any way trustworthy or honorable, we know better. the iranian ayatollahs' favorite slogan, death to america, should have tipped us off that iran is our adversary, not a peace-loving ally. president obama's foreign policy with respect to iran has set america back, endangering us and our allies, and with

mr. rothman is recognized. >> thank you. first of all, there was an incident referred to by chairman before.-- the chairman and i'm going to ask mr. reynolds about it, a situation where at first blush the wife was over the husband, is that true? >> in that -- in that situation she does not directly supervise her husband. she's in the regional office which is the next level up, sir. >> ok. how long did that situation exist? >> i would have to confirm, but i think it's been many, many years that they've been in service. >> i mean, was she -- >> long serving deputy. maybe more than 10 years. >> ok. i will give you another general question and this to me is just more evidence why no matter how tempting it may seem to my colleagues you never ever, ever want the government to do anything more than they have to. mr. healy -- one more question for mr. reynolds. you said that you never knew since you were the head of hr anybody being fired for sexual harassment, right? you couldn't remember that? mr. reynolds: yeah, i'm going to follo

mr. rothman. >> good afternoon supervisors. my name is richard rothman i represent district 1 on the park and open space advisory committee but since we haven't taken a position yet i will speak for myself. i agree that gold shouldn't be included and district 1 residents have a hard time using golden gate because we can't use fulton street and they're repaving it and we're trying to get mta to put crosswalks on every intersection between 25th avenue and ocean beach -- well, i don't understand mta. i don't know why but i listened to this presentation three times now and we heard it last month and last night and again today and i think alex andy doll of on phil's staff had a great idea. instead of concentrating on the data we know where the areas are, richmond district is very fortunate because all our parks are in good condition. i was surprised by the one tract in our neighborhood but why not set up through prozac or other groups set up district councils and let the districts decide where the money should go. should it go to pl

mr. rothman. >> good afternoon supervisors. my name is richard rothman i represent district 1 on the park and open space advisory committee but since we haven't taken a position yet i will speak for myself. i agree that gold shouldn't be included and district 1 residents have a hard time using golden gate because we can't use fulton street and they're repaving it and we're trying to get mta to put crosswalks on every intersection between 25th avenue and ocean beach -- well, i don't understand mta. i don't know why but i listened to this presentation three times now and we heard it last month and last night and again today and i think alex andy doll of on phil's staff had a great idea. instead of concentrating on the data we know where the areas are, richmond district is very fortunate because all our parks are in good condition. i was surprised by the one tract in our neighborhood but why not set up through prozac or other groups set up district councils and let the districts decide where the money should go. should it go to pl

mr. rothman and they are on a path but the designation there is largely complete too. woodward street we are waiting to hear back from the community on how they want to proceed with that, so i until we hear from them not sure where we would put them on the schedule. mary brown boulevard track will be ready this fall. new era hall is complete. the owner was having some legal issues in terms of property line issuewise the adjacent neighbor and understand those have been resolved. we didn't get a sense they were overwellmingly in support of designation but you have the report if the commission would like to act on it we can do that and reengage the owner or decide it is low priority and save it for another day. >> on the [inaudible] hall, i assume it is the property on the right hand side? >> correct, the old church >> is the property on the left on church and market, is that already a landmark? >> it is not >> is that identified? >> it is identified as a resource in the upper market survey but if there is anything on the list you think should be considered as well we can

mr. rothman and they are on a path but the designation there is largely complete too.oodward street we are waiting to hear back from the community on how they want to proceed with that, so i until we hear from them not sure where we would put them on the schedule. mary brown boulevard track will be ready this fall. new era hall is complete. the owner was having some legal issues in terms of property line issuewise the adjacent neighbor and understand those have been resolved. we didn't get a sense they were overwellmingly in support of designation but you have the report if the commission would like to act on it we can do that and reengage the owner or decide it is low priority and save it for another day. >> on the [inaudible] hall, i assume it is the property on the right hand side? >> correct, the old church >> is the property on the left on church and market, is that already a landmark? >> it is not >> is that identified? >> it is identified as a resource in the upper market survey but if there is anything on the list you think should be considered as well we can d

mr. rothman and they are on a path but the designation there is largely complete too.oodward street we are waiting to hear back from the community on how they want to proceed with that, so i until we hear from them not sure where we would put them on the schedule. mary brown boulevard track will be ready this fall. new era hall is complete. the owner was having some legal issues in terms of property line issuewise the adjacent neighbor and understand those have been resolved. we didn't get a sense they were overwellmingly in support of designation but you have the report if the commission would like to act on it we can do that and reengage the owner or decide it is low priority and save it for another day. >> on the [inaudible] hall, i assume it is the property on the right hand side? >> correct, the old church >> is the property on the left on church and market, is that already a landmark? >> it is not >> is that identified? >> it is identified as a resource in the upper market survey but if there is anything on the list you think should be considered as well we can d

mr. rothman. >> good afternoon supervisors. my name is richard rothman i represent district 1 on the park and open space advisory committee but since we haven't taken a position yet i will speak for myself. i agree that gold shouldn't be included and district 1 residents have a hard time using golden gate because we can't use fulton street and they're repaving it and we're trying to get mta to put crosswalks on every intersection between 25th avenue and ocean beach -- well, i don't understand mta. i don't know why but i listened to this presentation three times now and we heard it last month and last night and again today and i think alex andy doll of on phil's staff had a great idea. instead of concentrating on the data we know where the areas are, richmond district is very fortunate because all our parks are in good condition. i was surprised by the one tract in our neighborhood but why not set up through prozac or other groups set up district councils and let the districts decide where the money should go. should it go to pl