mr. sanchez? >> thank you, scott san shes, planning department, the discretionary review hearing was held in april, 2014, 24th, and to my knowledge and from what i can find and any of the ement mails this was first each brought to my attention on saturday with an e-mail from miss smith don't have any e-mails from mr. miller until this morning and i did respond to them this afternoon and again, this is a matter of the planning commission's rules, as implemented and enforced by the planning commission, and the executive secretary of the planning commission and so it is not a planning code issue and it is not a matter for the zoning administrator to, and as i said previously this is a denovo hearing and there are appeals filed and there are 14 minutes plus of the comment time for them and then 3 minutes in the rebuttals and to discuss this i think that they can raise all of the issues that they would like to, this is to correct any procedural errors that there may be at lower levels and that is the b

mr. sanchez. >> thank you.ening scott sanchez planning department so the question before you is a jurisdiction request in whether or not the city record in doing anything related to the permit that precluded the appellant or jurisdiction requester to file during the project that underwent the notification under section 311 there were no discretionary review requests 9 and it was not filed during the day and after construction of the building that the neighborhood resulted in the request before you i reviewed the plans and spoke with the folks that handled the error and it was not - i'm understanding the project is being built according to the plans for the neighborhood notification i discussed that with the staff planner and he said there were no issues with the project as proposed currently i'm available for any questions the board has. >> mr. sanchez was this a site or building permit. >> looks like it was maybe a building permit it was a site permit. >> so our planner reviewed the final permits set against t

mr. sanchez my understanding at first there was one motion to continue that failed two to four vote and then the motion to take discretionary review and that was a 5 to one vote in support of the motion whether supervisors commissioner hillis and commissioner richards. >> one question were you present at this particular. >> no, not at this particular hearing and again, we're representing the decisions of planning commission this is acknowledged as an unfortunate situation we're in this preempt but the permit holder neatest to have they're due process rights replaced as well, so to add to the situation they'll refile the application we'll disagree and they'll bring it before the whole board to have a decision i'm available for - >> it's not quite due process they need a majority. >> so had this the b b m been done the commission would have taken an action on the pretty we would have denied it. >> we shove done it but the fact it wasn't done right now the permit is approved therefore confirms of that permit requires two votes. >> and the permit that's the problem. >> that's been. >> there's an

mr. sanchez. neither the brief provided the substanation of dates if you are counting the dates just from the what was prepted both by both parties. to clear the excess of 18 months, how do you know that example that the lease was up may of 2012. he told us, >> i understand that it was a lot of verbal but was anything provided. >> it was a letter of determination and he informed us that they had lost the lease in may of 2012. and so in our letter of determination, the drop, and it ended nei understand that. >> because your letter of determination, clearly states that it was based upon the information that he provided. but was there any factual documentation provided in addition to the... >> we, any additional information that would have proved otherwise, would have been, you know, helpful, but we relied on the information that he provided and did not ask for the further evidence of the information that he provided. my question is, is that i understand that it is the law and he is subject to that.

mr. sanchez. >> no, i think we made the rest indication requests for the future. >> mr. duffy try and top that. >> due dare. >> just a fun fun fun night for us together it's confusing here we go from a building department point of view from dbi on the oirpsz of the permit there's nothing unusual on we got a suspension request and suspend it per planning department on 2014 because of the d b m i've not seen the plans i assume it's a 3 hundred there's permit for the kitchen sorry for the confusion. >> we'll absolve you have any responsibility. >> okay. thank you any public comment? >> my name is norma a fwrin of the actual deceased owner i knew her over 11 years before she died you asked about the shack can i put this down so what we have is the assessors card what happened is hal la she died in jill of last year purchased the property with the shack back in 1954 an identification of it and the same map it doesn't show up in the 1998, however, there is a notification of i'll explain how those shacks work all a thought victorians their 8 in a row as you can see there's 1456

mr. sanchez and mr. duffy to participate. >> so this is the alteration, and the demolition permit and if this were would be converted to a demolition, and to your building inspector and joe duffy can confirm, and they need to refile and there is two applications and one for demolition and one for new construction and this cannot be converted to a demolition, but maybe. dbi can also comment. >> but i think that perhaps the board and yeah, commissioners it is a form six, demolition permit, and the yellow form and that is the members of the form 1, 2, which is the new building, so you have two separate applications, and this as you have heard is an alteration, permit on the pink permit of what we typically see, and so that decision was made it is an alteration permit and so bear with me for just a second. >> then we will let them. >> i think that you have time. >> all right. >> yes, just for a second. you and i are probably not in disagreement that the greatest utility here for both sides is a complete demo

mr. sanchez, if that building is allowed to be brought down, would the year build be current because that is generally why we keep the structural walls, right? >> it is still on the existing year built? >> it usually goes by the cfc and so that is the determination of the department of building inspection, when you know, a new cfc will be required and a new cpc may be required any way for this building as it is. and it may be what is proposed now and so i don't know that removing a bit more of the wall would matter for that purpose. but, the existing building was a single family dwelling and so it would not have been subject to the rent control any way. i mean a single family dwelling and are subject to rent control if there was a occupant prior to 1996 that had been. >> how does it apply if the building was built prior to 1978, and turned into a two unit building. >> is that on the original year build or on the construction date? >> that is a question for the rent board, in this case, it is, you know, i think that this has limited amrikbility and it is not a clear cut case, if it was a t

mr. sanchez? >> to read from the letter of determination and requests that on september 28, 2011, local u.s. attorney forfeit tur fines and the present threats to the letter in the landlord for the (inaudible) when the storefront closed operations in november 11, 2011 our service continued to provide medicine to a smaller portion of club members and until the geary leased determination on may 11, 2012. that is what we based the letter of determination request on that they had closed in may of 2012, that more than 18 months had passed and that the center section of 9.3 was deemed abandoned and given that the location was within 1,000 feet of a school, they could not seek to reopen under the planning code requirements they can avail themselves of the planning code provisions and seek another location, and admit that it can be challenging to find a location given the restrictions, however those are the restrictions in the code since 2005, and those are the regulations which we implement for all mtds

mr. sanchez and then later the permit was suspended by the department of planning we because the permit was initially issued we, of course, had to appeal it in order to we're actually going there to process ms. miller filed for a discretionary review on june 13, 2014, we've been postponing this hearing a couple of the to await the planning xhagsz commissions ruling on the discretionary review and on august or october 23rd they planning commission voted to take review and disapprove the permit i just received the permit holders reapply today, i read through it briefly and not prepared to respond but of i were this is a situation where the permit holder should be appealing the planning commissions ruling back here at a later date rather than using the process to essentially ask for an appeal of the planning commissions decision so i think that you have to understand any sort of testimony received now regarding from the permit holder is more proper in the proper procedure to appeal the planning commission decision arrest the other point i'll make i had surely no chance to reapply to the brief

mr. sanchez. >> i think sanchez stepped up tonight. nick foles was playing all right. but sanchez got his shot. he made the best of t i think it was good stuff. it looks like they got a whole new attitude at home this year. you know? and it carried over from last year little bit, too, but they were fired up, they didn't stop playing really. >> by the way, you will hear more from rookie receiver jordan matthews about the best game of his career, and more from the birds coming up in sports. >>> happening today, honoring our country's veterans. it is veterans day, and the group philly veterans. com will launch new job program today to get 2,015 local vet hired in 2,015. they are holding virtual job fair this afternoon to kick start that effort. we're putting more information about how you can get involved on cbsphilly.com. >>> now, you can also pay tribute to our troops today at a veterans day parade in media, delaware county. eighty-five world war ii vets will march in the parade that starts at state and edgemont streets at 11:11 this morning. pennsylvania senator bob ka

mr. sanchez are you going to speak on this one. >> good evening scott sanchez planning department just briefly on the matter of the compliment that was filed on august 11th with the building inspection no complaints on file about the be department of building inspection it was issued to remove the rooms on the ground floor it's my understanding it doesn't remove a dwelling only removing the garage area so there's no spate fatalities and the appeal was filed open august 28th in discussing with the permit holders what is good evening conducted at the site the things that some of the rooms are operating as a group housing use i've informed the permit holder this is not employed in the single-family district not loud she's going to take steps to correct that but otherwise i don't see any issues from the planning code prospective something not legalized from an in-law unit but again only inhabitable units only the dwelling removed under the planning code they'll have to obtain one parking space for the single-family dwelling so that looks like the area in the garage was maintained for that they can

mr. sanchez push him and challenge him he's still doing a good job and you're taking and blocking and tackling we've got a whole season i've got a little piece and ms. president said last week the point to get more trees and thank you you for your direction and recently to get more trees and previously our government create factualism for getting more trees and that might be seen of the policy in forms of policy of vision zero and specifically how much beyond the engagement of this policy a engagement individuals rather it does factualism divides us in funding does that dr. divide the tree huggers and the biologists is a tree or shrub or bush are we looking the dimensions are we seeing for the slush and looking at the tree instead of the forest and ultimately we work hard to get to a point b we imagine this as a fixed point in 2020 having the resources and labor to get it down on our pathway to point b we can learn as urban planners and children a can do better and have an opportunity to engagement the community and raise for investment dollars while creating a green and wonderful society i ha

mr. sanchez okay. >> thank you scott sanchez planning department i mean, i'll be brief the application was not routed to the planning department and no plans associated with the permit, however, i reviewed the scope of the permits statistics on the permit application it will not as i understand the facts the scope will not constitute a merger under the section 17 i want to say for the boards information i think mostly the rent board issues so joe duffey can address the other matters. >> mr. duffy (laughter). >> commissioners on the building permit 2014031 apartment one the renovation of the bedroom all walls removed and plumbing needed and the bathroom by a 6 foot kitchen 8 by 9 permit was for the kitchen and bathroom remodeled permit it got approved on august 14th are 13, 2014 i believe some don't guess work has started i know that the building inspector has been out to the site i've spoken to him donald duffey i didn't go out there i was interested in going out there i've not seen n this type of condition in san francisco by then again in san francisco we with the orderly buildings there

mr. sanchez? >> thank you. scott sanchez, planning department, the subject property is located with an rh one and that is a single family zoning district, and the permit application was submited in june of 2013 and as has been noted the extent of the work additions at the rear, and at the rear has as you can see and it is seen as kind of a mix of structure and it would extend it two feet further from the greatest depth of the building. and so that is how we would have described it in our notices. the residential design team reviewed this after it was submitted and prior to the neighborhood notification, and the design team and that the design was appropriate and it was code complying but also, that met the requirements of the residential design guidelines, and they noted that it kind of did a lot to resolve all of the odd structures at the rear. and that given the other structures on the block that it did not represent an inappropriate extension to the mid block opened space. and the neighborhood notification w

mr. sanchez, or any of the eagles yesterday. one of those days.ught the eagles would win this game. i accept full responsibility. >> did you. >> i thought they would get to oh. i thought blitz against rogers, eagles would get rolling, but when you get rolling in a place like that, get out of the way, and unfortunately the eagles yesterday, you see the first, fletcher, giving receivers room all day, get to aaron rogers pitch and catch, easy touchdown there. and here again, this is aaron rogers, beautiful pass to injured i nelson, who along, terrorized the eagles all day, lambeau lead, there too many lambeau leaps in which a day offense, defense, special teams, all there. here is a third and ten, third down killed the eagles. lazy, ukee, nate will miss right here, jim brown impersination. >> just kept going. couldn't bring him down. >> then got pushed n still, all part of the game. >> six points, and then too many of those. i like the packers throw back uniforms. i thought maybe the eagles could keep the packers out of the lambeau leap. >> shouldn't

mr. mark sanchez, number three is ready to go.ll talk about it coming up in sports. >> i'd like to think i've grown and i know i have just watching film. things come faster comes easier. you know, you hear a lot of people say the game slows down. i think you just tend to speed up. you tend to relax a little bit, and i really enjoy playing in the system. >> all right. let's go to the sixers they host orlando tonight. at the well both teams looking for their first win of the season. close score throughout most of the game in this one. here we go. sixers defense was playing really tight. but i guess we don't have that video any way nerlins noel had to leave the game because he had an ankle injury but not the kn knee. he is okay as this one came down a close call and the sixers lost at the very last second of the contest all right. we'll move on and don't have that video for you. any way i need your help when it come to the friday football frenzy your choices this week are... hammonton at timber creek, haddonfield at haddon township,

. - senor sanchez. - mr. brashov. hombre. rosa says you are like a father to her. she is better than a daughter to me. i don't have to pay her bills. so, what brings you to the states ? rosa. actually, he's on his way to a conference in new york. in fact, we are only speaking english when miguel is here so he can practice. i have been in the states more than 30 years and he speaks better english than me ! come on in. carrie ? are you here ? i guess not. well, this is it. not exactly a palace but it's okay for now. - it's very nice. - how about something to drink ? water would be great. i brought something for you from home. miguel ! it's beautiful ! it belonged to my mother and to her mother before her. thank you. rosa, please sit down. there is something i want to talk to you about. now that i have finished architecture school-- - oh, hi. - [ rosa ] hi, carrie ! this is miguel. miguel, this is my roommate, carrie. - hola, miguel. ¿ como esta ? - good evening, carrie. i am feeling on top of the world. - you want to sit down for a while ? - i can't. you will never g

mr. mark sanchez, and we might add happy birthday mark sanchez, 28. >> twenty-eight years old today. >> yeah. he played like he was 25. good day, everyone have the it is tuesday november 11th 2014. >> before we get to the weather and traffic we want to remind you today is veterans day. we'd like to thank everybody who served our country. we're asking townsend us photos of yourself friend and family members in the military. use your hash tag fox 29 good day, and we will put them on the air throughout the morning. >> i will put kerry on the spot with tweet out a husband john, u.s. air force and iraq war veteran. >> turf find one. >> so sue serio, what a day if you do have today off, to enjoy the great outdoors. >> make sure do you that before it gets a little chilly later on in the week. we will give you another ten for veterans, sunny skies, we will have morning fog and maybe a few cloud around later on but it doesn't get much better than this for the 11th of november. we do have a few areas of reduced visibility half a mile down around fort dix, reduced visibility in lancaster, gotten better

sanchez? >> thank you, mr. chairman. and gentlemen, thank you again for being before us. mr.mith could not be here this morning and so i will be reading his statement. if it so pleases and i hope the chairman. so again these are not my words because as you know mr. chairman, i'm probably very different than a lot of the thought that is going on in the committee in my ways but these are mr. smith's words. he would like to thank witnesses for appearing here today just three months ago the president notified congress he had authorized the commander of central command to under take air strikes in iraq against i.s.i.l. just two short months ago on september 23 the administration provided a war powers notification of strikes in syria against i.s.i.l., since that time the u.s. has taken hundreds of strikes in iraq and syria killing hundreds of i.s.i.l. fighters, eliminating their freedom to move in convoys and substantially impacting ability to have oil and to fund their operations and driving their leadership under ground which complicated their ability to command and control their