mr. sanchez - mr. duffy. >> commissioners joe duffy dbi the permit brought to his attention to comply with the in violation with the kwarnt building and upgrading the building for unsafe with 12 units and expands 6 units units with the upgrading the piping and restore and replace the notice of violation was issued by dbi on the fourth of june 2009 and san bruno 07 preliminary from the structure engineers both recognize the urban safe condition on hate street a report frpat and on th shoring plans for the rehab of the structure and additional permits for electrical and plumbing maybe required the building is a 3 story with 12 rirlz you've heard and the previous permit history actually had a look at is this i read the brief and spoke to the architect at the dbi and basically, we've got a lot of permits in the file status and inspired what a permit is filed or xiertsdz on the first permit that permit needs to be withdrawn and the architect thought that the empowering at the dbi do that but navigate the 5

mr. sanchez thank you. >> any public comment? rebuttal starting where mr. harris. >> thank you. i'll be brief i guess i have more than 2 minutes but. >> 6 minutes. >> but i won't need that i know it's been a long process and lots of history we're wanting to finish that line ace mr. sanchez acknowledges that july one deadline will be met that means and believe me that review of those applications property by property entitlements requested can begin wisconsin we think that will happen on july 1st mr. sanchez is right and if the decision didn't become final until july 5th look at whether or not this deadline a met the operative issue assessment of the penalties beginning july 2nd will indeed be mute and the other point i want to address whether or not the eir was required and mr. sanchez says you know you're saying we're not supposed look at what happened before, no that's not the point the point is whether this long delay and this longs legalization and path to legalization was necessary and whether a ceqa review is necessary and as opposed to taking up the permits along the way

mr. sanchez. >> thank you good afternoon scott sanchez planning department. i think we have a couple of cases before the board marina the twnldz are subsidized and one of the concerns whether or not that will be used use group housing that depending upon the zoning district any require conditional use and may not be required in this case the zoning district allows the neighborhood notice that is required from one to the other but you know we don't have limits under the planning code for the number of bedrooms that's the issue that was before the board and ultimately in the use of the property and whether or not it is used in a manner this is consistent with the dwelling unit as extended in the planning code. >> so those matters are handled in terms of enforcement and the occupancy side when it is used possible to be used as dwelling unit by a family that have a need for the number of bedrooms or used in a manner this is consistent with group housing both are allowed but. >> neighborhood notice is needed in terms of a hammerheads turn around going back to 2009

mr. sanchez. >> scott sanchez planning department.ject property within a rh3 that does allow for a firewall up to ten feet in upgrade of the subject property the plans is on file that is 9 foot 8 inches off grades on the subject property and allows for stairs that exceed a height of 3 feet above grade for the building level to the rear yard and projects up to 6 feet into the required rear yard and based on the plans they filed overseeing planning requirement in regards to an illegal unit units or shortly or short-term rental a couple of complaints regarded the short-term rental and staff abated they'll definitely has been listed the listing has been removed and no longer active from what our staff determines yards to the potential illegal unit one 0 improvement for the ground floor including a full bath on plans from a few years ago from the 2012 plans they exceeded the scope and had an additional sink at the ground level that was part of airbnb sweep, however, it was used there was a permit filed and issued earlier this year to remov

mr. sanchez? >> thank you, scott sanchez, planning department, i concur with the findings of senior building inspector curin, the permit was inappropriately issued if it was not [inaudible] and it does seem to be the the intend of the property owner to no longer have this be a dwelling unit as amended on april 10th of this year, removal of an unauthorized unit does require conditional use authorization and the definition of unauthorized unit is fairly broad and would capture this, it means there's one or many more rooms within a building which is not used with the benefit of a building permit independent from residential units on the same property independent means the space has independent access that does not require entering a residential unit on the property and there is no open visual connection to a residential unit on the property. this does appear to meet those thresholds, they would require a conditional use authorization to remove -- there are processes as part of this where we would we v

mr. sanchez in that discussion. >> certainly one of the issues the preps we may struggle with the pattern of the neighborhood one that office developed to the front and one others one side to the rear this is given the large lot to maintain two dwelling units on the lots so reducing the number of with dwelling units but respect that so looking at this thing this is what the conclusion of the residential design team that is code compliant and given the depth of the lot had that adjacent building i've been there had it not been extend into the rear as it does located in the middle of the lot this may not have been been supportable but given the context that resulted this of the supportable. >> speak to me if you would about the aspect of the merger. >> technically a demolition because of the building that was removed but you know ultimatum we found support the findings are in the executive summary one of the rent-controlled units housing that was produced by one because of the structure being the construction at the rear but the department found that was supportable maintaining the number o

mr. sanchez? >> thank you, scott sanchez, planning department, i concur with the findings of senior building inspector curin, the permit was inappropriately issued if it was not [inaudible] and it does seem to be the the intend of the property owner to no longer have this be a dwelling unit as amended on april 10th of this year, removal of an unauthorized unit does require conditional use authorization and the definition of unauthorized unit is fairly broad and would capture this, it means there's one or many more rooms within a building which is not used with the benefit of a building permit independent from residential units on the same property independent means the space has independent access that does not require entering a residential unit on the property and there is no open visual connection to a residential unit on the property. this does appear to meet those thresholds, they would require a conditional use authorization to remove -- there are processes as part of this where we would we v

mr. sanchez if there are reasons specified i'll be interested no body of evidence that you heard the presence of an mcd increases the livelihood that agree child whether abuse a cannabis no please activities or complaints on the aau forgot years i made the motion to take discretionary review i understand the concerns around the attendance in the hotels i ask we originally have a 25-year-old cut off point they can sell cannabis we were told or lead to believe we couldn't do that forestalling but paired it back over 21st years of age we asked for no delivery so someone can order across the board i'm speaking speak gnaws deputy mr. owen clued me in said do businesses we're allowed to set a threshold forage for recollecting the business activity i would suggest if any hung opinion take the train of thought as a planning commission i'll grant the appeal for the neighborhoods, however, i'll approve the project with the condition that none 21 to 25 years old will be able to purchase from that medical cannabis dispensary formal a period of time may be one year or two years and at the end of that suns

mr. sanchez. >> in the case reports they've considering a loss of owner move-in evictions and the housing balance report the loss is over 4 thousand 1 hundred units during etch 10 year balance that is reporting you as you may know rent-controlled units are an international part of housing stock the loss is not only because san franciscans lost their housing but because the housing is extremely difficult to replace therefore tracking the magnitude of a loss is an important endeavor it is important because it is one purpose of the housing balance report as much as it concerns itself with the share of affordable housing as a total share of the city's affordable housing stock the department is in support of proposed ordinance we firmly believe that further clarifications can be made we're proposing that similar language to a harmonize the language and the department is also in support of the publishing dates as mentioned in earlier by april we are proposing to move the march publishing date to april and the other to september and also recommend moving the annual hearing from april to may alth

mr. sanchez, so do you know approximately how many unit ares not in compliance? >> it's my understanding that it may be as many as 23 sites. >> have any of those particular sites been before this board? >> i do not know that information, no. >> i'll ask the permit holder that. thank you. >> scott, out of 20-something site, out of how many does extenet have? >> i think that's all that they have. >> every one of them ?frjts dhe can address that, my understanding is that it's the sites that have been approved but perhaps it's not all of the sites. >> thank you. >> should we hear from the department next? okay. mr. shaw? >> goods evening, rahal shaw with public would besinger, just to speak on what scott mentioned, yes, so we did become recently aware of 23 wireless installations which are different from the approved plans and it's what mr. sanchez testified to, it's the switch boxes i believe, they're a little larger than what was on the proposed plans, so pursuant to section 1517, pub lib works issued notices of deficiency earlier this week on the 25th and then wha

mr. sanchez. >> thank you scott sanchez planning department. i did distrust that q with omar and the understanding that the arts commission didn't have any jurisdiction over the light poles by the city you're correct commissioner fung that the arts commission will review street furniture like the newspaper racks and present bus shelters, etc. i reviewed the materials on the website no indication mentioned about their review of utility infrastructure the purpose was to allow for design review of capital improvement plan capital improvement projects to insure the design is appropriate north america's the significant costs was the reason this was initially added sounds like the arts commission has a limited capacity and omar reported to me because they have reviewed some decorative poles in mission bay when the application was so you get to add an utility to one of the polls it required the arts commission review they approved the design identical to that we approved throughout the city. >> you know, i remember the arts commission on the embarcade

mr. sanchez could you please comment on the enforcement action. >> yeah. certainly this is correct there is a violation on the sweet intermission property we have not abide the violation at this point but the responsible party has been responsive and taken steps to abate the violation we not made a determination to abate that violation but been working with us i discussed that with staff and the good faith efforts to bring that property into compliance i don't see to hold back the application but it is clear they're aware of the formula retail process to have this application on file. >> i appreciate your putting it into the record popular local grown company that has now by default been a local retail and the commission supports we have them in front of us very credible presentations and credible public support i move to approve with conditions. >> second. >> commissioners, if there's nothing further, we'll move on to a there is a motion that has been seconded to approve that with conditions. >> commissioner antonini. >> commissioner hillis commissioner m

mr. sanchez called me to advise me that the staff had seen the error and therefore wanted to reassure the that both of the academies appropriately amendments are alive and well and will be considered at the same time and on the same footing before this commission as the proposals that the staff may have proposed and with that clarification i just wanted to observe a couple of problems with the staffs proposal is the academies proposal will maintain the existing inventory of student housing the staffs will not actually force students who are currently living in established student housing to move out and become compete oversees in the open market this is not a good result i don't think and this provides a rate that is reasonable for students but if the staffs proposal is adopted those students are moved out the those particular units will be available at point market-rate and will become very, very expensive given today's environment third there is an assumption built in assumption that the general plan requires the students for schools to conduct new housing it didn't if you read the hous

mrs. sanchez. >> thank you, gentlemen, and i want to thank the gentlemen before us for all the great work that you're doing. secretary johnson, in march, you came before our committee and we re discussing the countering violent extremism mission. and we talked about having the department of homeland security allowing some of those grants to be used to nonprofit organizations to help us in countering the fight in going after the fight against terror. and i just want to thank you and compliment you because i know and that you're finding new innovative ways to improve those nonprofits that we have in our area. as you know i have one of the largest muslim and arab communities in our nation some of we work very closely with a lot of our nonprofits too to keep an ear to the ground and to nsure that we are on the forefront of trying to eliminate any of this radicalization that has such a potential that we saw in san bernardino. i want to ask a couple of questions. after 911 we try to share more information between local states and federal agencies especially in the intelligence gathering and sha

. >> public comment one card veronica sanchez and anyone else after veronica is done speaking you can speak. >> mr. president, and members of the commission veronica sanchez from the polite first, i want to thank you, mr. president for your leadership responsiveness at the may meeting you directed the staff to start this community process and the gentleman explained that was very wroerth and we want to thank the commission and i think that jim is present and it was said best at the we'd district attorney board meeting he conveyed to the directors our desire to open this up and he said you know most of the time people are complaining that butter have not moving faster and this is the right thing to do the staff report is very good and responsiveness to the questions the operative statement for us that we were looking for our union was this is a ferry terminal and it is a joint project where weed district attorney the state agency our union and sister union work hard to get and mandated with the creation of new ferry routes in the by a happy to see that language and thank our staff direction on that

sanchez. >> thank you, mr. chairman. and i want to thank all of the gentlemen before us today for all the great work that you're doing. secretary johnson, in march, you came before our committee and we were discussing the countering violent extremism mission. and we talked about having the department of homeland security allowing some of those grants to be used to nonprofit organizations to help us in countering the fight and going after the fight against terror. and i just want to thank you and compliment you because i know that you're finding new and innovative ways to include those nonprofits that we have in our area. as you know, i have one of the largest muslim and arab communities in our nation. so we work very closely with a lot of our nonprofits to keep an ear to the ground and to insure that we're on the forefront of trying to eliminate any of this radicalization that has such a potential, as we saw in san bernardino. i want to ask a little -- a couple questions. the first would be, after 9/11, we tried to share

mr. speaker. seven weeks, 52 days. ms. sanchez: i rise today to express my disappointment with our republican colleagues for shutting down the congress for the summer. after the tragedies in orlando and dallas, are you telling me that we can't get together, that we cannot find a compromise on gun violence? on gun control? the american people believe we can. they want it done. mr. speaker, is there no action with respect to flint, michigan? so much of our infrastructure needs to be redone and so many cities, this is just the beginning of what we will see. we have to address these crises because working families all over the country will go to work tomorrow and they'll go to work on saturday and they'll go to work on sunday and they will go to work for the next seven weeks. they expect us to find solutions. mr. speaker, let's get to work. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from north carolina seek recognition? ms. foxx: i ask unanimous consent to address the house for one minute, mr. speaker. the speaker

mr. heck of nevada, ms. stefanik, ms. loretta sanchez of california, mrs. davis of california, messrs. langevin, larsen of washington, cooper, ms. bordallo, mr. courtney, ms. tsongas, messrs. garamendi, johnson of georgia, ms. speier, and mr. peters. from the permanent select committee on intelligence, for consideration of matters within the jurisdiction of that committee under clause 11 of rule 10, messrs. nunes, pompeo and schiff. from the committee on education and the work force, for consideration of sections 571 through 74 and 578 of the senate bill, and sections 571, 573, 1098-e, and 3512 of the house amendment and modifications committed to conference. messrs. walberg, guthrie, scott of virginia, from the committee on energy and commerce, for consideration of sections 3112 and 3123 of the senate bill, and sections 346, 601, 749, 3119-a 0, 1095, 1673, and 3119-c of the house amendment and modifications committed to conference. messrs. latta, johnson of ohio, and pallone. from the committee on foreign affairs for consideration of 1050, s 828, 1006, 1007, 1221 through 23, 1247, 232

sanchez: i thank my colleague from colorado and i ask unanimous consent, mr. speaker, to bring up h.r. 217, the bipartisan expanded background check legislation, to honor the memory of kiara kinnardt, a victim of gun violence who never received a moment of silence on the house floor on this house floor. the speaker pro tempore: as previously announced, the unanimous consent request cannot be entertained. the gentleman from colorado is recognized. mr. polis: i'd like to yield to the gentleman from maryland, mr. van hollen, for purposes of a unanimous consent request. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman is recognized. mr. van hollen: thank you. i ask unanimous consent to bring up h.r. 1217, the bipartisan expanded background checks legislation, in honor of the memory of mercy cordova, a victim of gun violence, who never received a moment of silence on the house floor. the speaker pro tempore: as previously announced, the unanimous consent request cannot be entertained.. the gentleman from colorado is recognized. mr. polis: i want to point out on my own time t

mr. washington i like to elevate the question whether the sanchez stairs in this particular location fall into the category of protected b use ? there is a specific map, which shows protected views and if this particular state or falls with in it and it's a complicated map in answer to commissioner richards question, i don't have them all in my head, when it comes to a project like this, this would be definitely an answer i would like to staff to have either yes or no. is this particular stair within the protected views category for the city of san francisco? >> i can say with certainty that it is. did you can set it is certainly either but to expand on that a little bit, commissioner richards, there's general plan identifies several streets that are either good, excellent, for public views though i think the most important thing here is to remember for public use, not on private property. so, essentially, the street are to be kept open for these you corridor downs >> we've alterations ideally should have minimal impact on these corridor. >> i would obviously like to see consideration as

mr. kinsey says he's not spoken to the police but he has with the city attorney in miami and they hope to reach some type of settlement soon. >> we have a problem. boris sanchezverage from cleveland continues in just a moment. thank you. >>> here we go. we are live in cleveland, ohio. i'm brooke baldwin. sweeping in there, the star of the show, the q. that is where we will see donald trump this fourth and final night here making his mega speech on this last day of the republican national convention. mr. trump has just completed his walk-through on the convention stage. he popped through as he prepares for what will amount to the biggest speech of his life in just a couple of hours. he will step forward in front of millions of eyeballs and formally accept the republican nomination for president. but his former rival, ted cruz, he is stealing some of the headlines on this third day. in his speech before that crowd at the rnc, the texas senator refused to endorse donald trump, setting off this cacophony of boos right there on the convention floor. that's how it played out. if you were standing on the floor last night. meantime, flashforward to this morning, ted

mrs. obama. >> president obama and vice president biden are endorsing kamala harris for the open united states senate seat praising her work as a lifelong prosecutor running against orange county representative sanchezost everything in emeryville are the target of looters, who are sneaking into their units despite being yellow or red tagged which is unsafe. >> temperatures are below average from the clouds it the cost keeping you at 62 to 82 in antioch so not much of a summer spread. >> we are looking at the bay bridge backup with metering lights on at 5:30 and number 5 checking the east bay commute from highway 4, the upper part of the freeway all the way to san francisco was 53 minutes and you have to wade through the backup. >> if you ride bart, do not expect the cameras to be on the trains for for time although bart said it would happen soon. it will not happen until late next year. >> and pokemon has preloaded attacks on ebay with hundreds of gold coins and magic carpets for pokemon go. >> there is a man who sold his level 21 account for $1,500 and people are catching in. see you in 25 minutes. and these are the lungs. (boy) sorry. (dad) don't worry about it. (vo) at our house, we need things t