mr. sanchez.expressing his concern that he didn't have a place to parole and he was short. >> short? >> short to the door, meaning his release date was fast approaching. and so, i told him that i would get him some applications for places in albuquerque. i brought you some applications like we talked a couple weeks ago in places for preparation for parole back to albuquerque. and your release date is -- >> july 1st. >> july 1st. >> that's all i'm waiting for. >> okay. so no more disciplinary. you owe nothing. >> there's something in my heart that's just saying that something -- i'm not going to end up going that day. i don't know why. but i just sense it. i wonder if you can give them a ring on the phone, you know. hey, did you get this? >> yes, i'll follow up. >> can you push this, you know? let's get this approved so i can have that, all right, sanchez, you're approved. >> well, i can get the wheels rolling to make sure nothing happens that will delay you. >> i know something's going to happen.

the witnesses also gay people were yelling that this person mr sanchez was deaf and could not hear he also didn't know this at the time so as mr sanchez came off the porch he started dancing to the second officer who was there this is going to be officer are actually a sergeant christopher bards. sergeant brodhead his weapon drawn and lieutenant lindsay had to have a taser drop as he started going towards these officers with a pipe in his hands a serious discharging a weapon. a neighbor says sanchez carried a pole with him as protection from stray dogs and wasn't a threat to the officers the oklahoma city police department has launched an investigation into the shooting the officer who fired his gun has been placed on administrative leave joining me now to discuss this further is ronald hampton retired d.c. metro police officer thank you so much for joining us today ronnell thank you now i want to start with what went wrong here according to witnesses the officers a shot a taser and shot a gun simultaneously well why what went wrong was that the police didn't know anything about this

mrs. sanchez's question and mr. larson, i think, you said that one new administrative law judge and the appropate personnel for their office would create a reduction in backlog by what amount a year? 150-200,000about for each. >> for each judge, or? >> over all. based upon -- we are ready put out about 700,000, i think we could do a next her 150-200,000 if i had a clerk and two attorneys. >> withow many lawyers hired? >> i do not know exactly how many the agency has. >> ok, all right -- >> i do not know how many more -- >> what the gym and is saying, he is asking about the staff, not the judges -- >> exactly. >> trying to make sure they are fully staffed? >> exactly. >> ok thank you. >> the time for the gentleman has expired. i ask for a unanimous consent for the report. mr. kelly's reference to the record without objections,o ordered. as we have heard todaysocial security has lot of work to do, people are waiting to long to get a hearing. that is simply unacceptable. the good news is that social security has a plan

mr. speaker, i ask unanimous consent -- ms. sanchez: mr. speaker, i ask unanimous consent to bring up the dream act, to protect dreamers like nadia, who received a master's degree in public health from u.c. davis. the speaker pro tempore: as previously anounlsd, unanimous consent request cannot be entertained. mr. mcgovern: mr. speaker, i'm happy to yield to the gentleman from arizona for the purpose of a unanimous consent request. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from arizona. mr. gallegly: mr. speaker, i ask unanimous consent -- mr. gallego: mr. speaker, i ask unanimous consent to bring up the dream act, to protect vasthti. ike vsa -- sfoip the unanimous consent request cannot be entertained. mr. mcgovern: i'm proud to yield to the gentlelady from california for the purpose of a unanimous consent request. the speaker pro tempore: the gentlelady from california. ms. chu: mr. speaker, i ask unanimous consent to bring up h.r. 3440, the dream act, to protect dreamers like alfonso, who is in his third year at western state college of law

sanchez: thank you, mr. speaker. today's bill that's on the floor is nothing more than a harsh measure that seeks to cast a broad net and cast immigrants in general in a poor light by labeling them criminals based on the suspicions but not the actual facts. what's more, this harsh and reckless measure provides virtually no procedural safeguards for people to challenge a police officer's opinion as to whether or not they are involved in a gang. a mere suspicion can mean that somebody can be facing removal. instead of dealing with such draconian legislation, we should be talking about the positive contributions that immigrants make to this country and the fact that we have over 800,000 dreamers in this country who are waiting for this congress to act. they've been hoping and waiting for years for this congress to provide a legislative solution to allow them to continue to live in their communities, to contribute to the economy, to pay taxes, and to be part of a country that they consider their own. many of these dreame

mr. sanford, and a member opposed each will control five minutes. the chair recognizes the gentleman from south carolina. ms. sanchez: -- mr. sanford: i thank the gentleman. i want to make clear i'm offering this amendment on behalf of frank lobiondo who i know has worked with my colleague, don beyer from virginia, on this bipartisan measure. i think it's one that makes sense. it would quite simply restrict money with regard to seismic testing on the atlantic waters and the waters of the florida straits. why do i think that that's important? i think it's important because you don't build a foundation if you don't intend to build a house. and yet fundamentally what we're trying to do is move forward on something that i think begs this most republican of questions which is, do we believe in home rule? because at home every municipality of every town and hamlett along the coast of south carolina has come out unanimously against the idea of offshore drilling and seismic testing. not because they're against fossil fuel, but simply because they believe that they want to determine themselves how the coast of south carolina

sanchez. >> thank you, mr. chairman. and thank you to all of our witnesses for being here and providing excellent testimony about what we should be looking at as we move forward on tax reformat. i don't think there is a person on this dais who wouldn't agree we are looking for tax reform that is fair, simple and provide certainty. but that looks out for middle-class americans like the constituents that we represent. right now one of the biggest issues that confronts any of my constituents are these unwinnable choices that they have to make between raising a family on one parent's salary or having one parent leaving the work force because of the skyrocketing costs of child care. and that's an issue that i've worked on for several years. but increasingly for working families, child care costs are a real determining factor in whether or not women leave the work force. and many of them are very talented, but the cost of obtaining affordable child care almost cancels out the salary earnings they would make. so i'm interested

sanchez's question and mr. larson's i think. you said that by one new administrative law judge and the appropriate personnel for their office would create a reduction in backlog by what amount a year? >> i estimate between 150 and 200,000 extra dispositions if you gave us staff. >> for each one, administrative law judge, or -- >> no, overall, overall based upon -- we already put out about 700,000. i think we could do an extra 150,000 to 200,000 if i had a clerk and two attorneys. >> with how many lawyers hired those? >> i don't know exactly how many the agency has. >> okay. all right. >> i don't know how many more. >> if the gentleman would yield, it sounds like saying not with additional judges, but getting staffing for the current judges that exist. >> oh, using the current administrative law judges to make sure they're fully staffed? >> exactly. >> thank you. >> the time of the gentleman has expired. i ask for unanimous con send and insert in the report mr. kelly's reference to the record. without objection, so ordered. alway

sanchez: thank you, mr. speaker. while my colleagues on the other side of the aisle press forward with their partisan gimmicks, 800,000 young people are still holding their breaths. with time quickly running out, they are wondering what their futures look like without daca. will they lose their jobs? will they have to drop out of college after they've already paid tuition? will they live in fear that i.c.e. will be waiting for them at any corner? all these fears can be eliminated if republican leadership allowed a vote on the bicameral, bipartisan dream act. passing the dream act will help our country reach the goal of 3% economic growth. the dream act would allow them to continue improving themselves and their education. in the process, they would add 7 -- $728 billion cumulatively to our economy over a decade, due to an education bump. the dream act would allow current teachers, nurses, soldiers, engineers, high school and college students, and hundreds of thousands of others to continue contributing to our economy

mr. trump warned the u.s. has been talking to north korea and paying them extortion money for 25 year. talking is not the answer. >> let's bring in boris sanchez. he joins us live from washington. boris, there has to be a day of reckoning. there has to be. president trump has levelled threats to north korea. he said if they don't, they're going to experience fury, the likes of which they've never seen before. now there's this huge provocation. there's going to be a day of reckoning and now north korea is going to have to respond to this. >> absolutely. all eyes on president trump this morning awaiting a response from the white house. we have yet to get a response. we did hear a few moments ago from officials in south korea, the chief national security adviser there, chung yung saying he's looking to isolate it and he had a meeting with h.r. mcmaster, so they're clearly aware of this test. the president was actually tweeting a few short moments before this test took place, however, he was not tweeting about north korea, he has not tweeted since. you said it. this is by far the strongest provocation that we've seen from north korea, and each of