you are on "the communicators," mr. sasso. >> guest: thank you. you have concerns of legislation. i'm wondering is specifically what gc changed, what provisions should be added before they should become law. >> guest: well, i am concerned that in its present form the amendments don't really seem to take law-enforcement concerns into account at all. there was some distinction drawn by the committee between civil access and search warrants and subpoenas and so on for data in a criminal. they did draw a distinction between the two are very different. i would point to several issues. two primarily. one is the voluntary disclosure, the emergency deception. those need to be further defined and codified. as i pointed out before, not every service provider resume request from law enforcement in a similar fashion. that is first and foremost. there also should be a production component. right now, there really isn't anything that specifies how quickly, whether it be through search warrant, or emergency conception how quickly they need to respond to the request. so that's something that need