mr. schneiderman, your view. do you conform to that view it is implicitly or even obviously, a better word for it, obviously anti-muslim? >> yeah, i think i would use the word transparently. it's very clear from the language of the order, itself, which has references to -- some language taken out of these statutes that were designed to make illegal sharia law, it refers to honor killings and refers to preferences for minorities in the countries affected which clearly are predominantly ristian. so it's transparently anti-muslim. this is made more clear by statements that mr. trump and other people associated with him have made outside of the executive order that make it very clear that this is an effort to favor christians over muslims. the constitution says you cannot discriminate based on religion, can't discriminate based on national origin, can't take away people's procedural rights to due process of law and equal protection of the law. this offends a variety of provisions of the constitutions and as bob point