quickly starting with you, mr. simon.enis going back there. >> lehrer: he's right to say that? >> well one of theÑi yemenis who went back happens to be at the head of al qaeda, the arabian peninsula, which is theç group we're really worried about. >> lehrer: enough said. mr. button. >> exactly the same. public confidence demands they stay atw least in some form of security detention. >> lehrer: an automatic decision. >> absolutely. it was inevitable. no question butç the president had to say that. we're going to suspend the repatriation. if i could briefly disagree!3 with my friend steve. >> lehrer: you may. >> intelligence is always ambiguous. it doesn't get any clearer than it was here. unless we connect dots in this instance, heaven help us in future cases. >> lehrer: you still don't want to fire anybody, mr. s[mon. >> the thing is, it is often ambiguous and clark is absolutely right about that. but it does get lwss ambiguous. if mr. abdulmutallab had come in to the embassy and said, listen, myñlson wants to blow up

and then as miles simons said mean mugging the crowd. getly tumbe thisnt, e th... e ma mon we mr ye willave erag ou n mos t no now co! kickmalless putour ss on t. fse, go h ! f checase. mostre 3rage an ath v wir her ee. ur bs . ♪ kfc grrwing nate grio se thef-a-aste who tring r aet o ♪ medas wi engd 7 g nanolo conlant to cnts. rst- hs h ly rexus >> steve: washington trailing at home by three to washington state. let's look at our lexus play book. >> miles: sets his man up. comes for the pick and roll. quincy pondexter loses contact with koprivica allowing koprivica to go ahead and flip to the rim for the old fashioned and one. >> steve: four of four from the field and two of three foul shots, so almost having a perfect game. also two z as and four rebounds. and that's also with casto and watson in foul trouble and koprivica really needed to pick it up. reggie moore, you talked in the open about him controlling the basketball. he has five turnovers in the first half already and they've led to some washington appointments coming back in this game. >> miles: a couple were fumbled balls out of

mr. jefferson's university of virginia. alan murray is deputy assistant managing editor of of the "wall street journal's out of -- "wall street journal's out -- wall street journal." next, we have robert simons, a contributing editor at "newsweek" where he has written about business and economic issues since 1977. past and future of american affluence. we have a pbs correspondent for the news hour. recently, he has become a fellow at yale's center. he was a lively moderator at the panel that followed at the dinner. and without, and going to turn to bob and asked him to conduct the discussion on the question, has the financial crisis changed the nature of economic news. >> people are almost desperate to want to pay attention to the type of thing, the selahi thing. and they are encouraged to do so by my medium, television. but there is a much greater consequent these days, and what we have in terms of financial burden is the best of times and worst of times. we have the best of times, people admired because of their ability to explain arcane concept to which people can understand. unfortunately, people often tends to not take the time to understand them, and we have the self-feeding media fren

mr. secretary, you talked about looking at these events with the benefit of hindsight. two men who did were peter blum, who is a researcher at the london school economic so and simon johnson, a professor at mit's be good to closer to the mic so we can hear him? thank you. >> simon johnson, a professor at mit, sloan school of management. and they wrote in the new republic magazine in a september 23 issue, the fed may well have mitigated our current crisis by sowing the seeds for the next one. and they say in fact, the fed has exacerbated the possibility of another. similar even larger crisis. in fact, the way they put, as a result and less real reform happen soon we face the prospect of another bubble bursting bailout cycle. that will be even more dangerous than the one we have just been through. now i assume you know the american people are very, very angry about these bail outs and bonuses and salaries that have come about through what most people see as a big government, big business duopoly. and if you like this big government, big business duopoly has been an appealing in in such a way as to allow such a mind-boggling salaries and bonuses and allow very few a leaders

mr. secretary, you talked about looking at these events with the ben fight of hindsight too. men who did were peter boone who is a researcher at the london school of economics and simon johnson, professor at mit. >> can you get closer to the mike so we can hear? >> simon johnson, a professor at mit and sloan school of management. they wrote in the new republic magazine in the september 23rd issue, the fed may well mitigate our current crisis by sewing the seeds for the next one. in fact the fed has exacerbated the possibility of another similar or larger crisis. the way they put it, they said as a result unless real reform happens soon, we face the prospect of another bubble burst that will be more dangerous than what we have been through. i assume you know that the american people are very, very angry about the bailouts. the bonuses and salaries that have come about through what most people think is a big business. they feel this did you oply has been manipulated to allow mind-boggling salaries and bonuses and allow very few to come out the free market system was not allowed to operate. it seems to most of us it is not capitalism to -- when government uses billions

mr. secretary, you talked about looking at these events with hindsight and two men who did a researcher at the london school of economics -- >> could the gentleman speak closer to the mike so we can hear? >> simon johnson a professor at m.i.t. sloane school of management. they wrote in "the new republic" magazine on the september 23 issue, the fed may have mitigated our current crisis by tsaoing the seeds for the next one and shea -- and they said the fed exacerbated the possibility of another similar, larger crisis, as they say, quote, as a result, unless real reform happens soon, we face another bailout psych that will will be worse than what we just went through. i assume you know the american people are mad about the bailouts and the bonuses and salaries that have only about through this, what most people say see as a big government, big business duoply and they feel this big government, big business duoply has been manipulated to allow just mind-boggling salaries and bonuses and allowed very few elitists at the top to come out like robber barrens or to an extent not known in american history. because of big government, through the federal reserve system, our free market system was not allo

mr. secretary, you talked about looking at these events with the ben fight of hindsight too. men who did were peter boone who is a researcher at the london school of economics and simonof management. they wrote in the new republic magazine in the september 23rd issue, the fed may well mitigate our current crisis by sewing the seeds for the next one. in fact the fed has exacerbated the possibility of another similar or larger crisis. the way they put it, they said as a result unless real reform happens soon, we face the prospect of another bubble burst that will be more dangerous than what we have been through. i assume you know that the american people are very, very angry about the bailouts. the bonuses and salaries that have come about through what most people think is a big business. they feel this did you oply has been manipulated to allow mind-boggling salaries and bonuses and allow very few to come out the free market system was not allowed to operate. it seems to most of us it is not capitalism to -- when government uses billions and billion was taxpayer money to prop up a few well-connected firms. that leads me to two questions. one, has the second, do you to