mr. slahi was not approved for transfer at that time.mportant is there's also a new process for those who were not approved for transfer where he'll get a full hearing. his lawyer can fully participate. he can show that incarceration is not warranted because he doesn't present a significant security threat. one thing very important in this context, any information from torture or what's called cruel, degrading, or inhuman treatment, cannot be used. >> and ms. hollander, under questioning, mr. slahi said in the past he was a member of al qaeda. what kind of evidence can you present in this new hearing that might get him freed? are you convinced personally that he's no longer a threat? >> i'm convinced he was never a threat. he's innocent. he's never been charged with a crime all the time he's been there. at the time he joined al qaeda, that's not the same al qaeda that came to the united states. this was in '90, 1990, when the afghanis were fighting against the soviets with full support from the united states. so that's what -- that's whe