mr. spencer. i just need everybody to be here for the time being. i see. can i ask you a question, mr.yes, you. young woman... i want to speak to your commanding officer. you mean detective chief superintendent foyle, sir. i don't care what his name is. i want to leave this hotel. i'm afraid that's not possible. he gave strict orders that everyone-- do you know who i am? no, sir. i'm afraid i haven't got the faintest idea. i am sir ernest bannerman. sir ernest is the mp for this constituency. you have no right whatsoever to keep me here. and this lady, miss harwood-- she has important work in whitehall. i have to be in london. i'm at the foreign office. i'll be missed. you're a driver. you can take me and my wife home and then take miss harwood to the station. come along. i'm afraid you'll have to ask mr. foyle, sir. what? are you defying me? yes. it looks as if i am. i can't believe it happened. it's a terrible thing. i was right beside her when the lights went out... inches away. maybe they were firing at you. were you due to speak at this meeting, mr. ellis? no. certainly not. did y

mr. spencer? i'm a politician, mr. foyle. and the way you've treated me, i think you have forgotten that i am the leader of a legitimate organization with legitimate views, even if you don't agree with them. but i'd like you to know that i am just as much a patriot as you are. i love our country. but it is possible to believe that this war with hitler is misguided. poles and czechs, they're jewish interests, not british. i know what you believe. i don't think you do. i doubt that you know, for example, that the first 2 british pilots shot down over germany were black shirts. the kiel raid at the end of last year-- they were both mosley's men. and sir ernest bannerman, mp-- i suppose you would call him a crank and a traitor. well, he served in the first war. he was a member of the north russian relief force in 1919. right now, he has a son serving in northern france. you have a son serving with the raf. are you prepared to lose him, to see him slaughtered simply because hitler invaded poland? i'll take you to mr. fleming. than

mr. spencer's report, they're not managing their network the right way. they just want to slap around antenna -- i'm sorry -- they prefer to place antennas all over the city instead of managing their network better. i'm not sure if i have more time, i wanted to say a couple of things. >> put one thing up. i want to address it. this is their after picture? do i have it upside down still? in their original c.u.p. they sent to the planning commission, they identified holly park as one of the areas where they needed to upgrade coverage. if you look at the map you have in front of you, this doesn't address holly park. 2g, 3g, 4g, none of it addresses all of the folks they want to address. it's not the right site, it's not right plan. >> we love technology. technology is a part of our life. we're not against at&t. i'm an addict of the iphone. an expansion of wireless services should be allowed when there is a true need from the communities affected the most. we all agree that san francisco should be leader in technology but we can't continue with this approach.

mr. spencer offers his opinion but does not support it with technical data. i do not find any mention of or data supporting technical review of any potential alternative sites to the proposed sites. the second peer review that we engage was with consultants from san bernadine know. the performer views from municipalities from the united states. several in the greater bay area. they reported that "the packet contains insufficient and permission for a peer review. either there is an existence of a meaningful gap or whether or not there could be a less intrusive means." at&t has not submitted information that would allow any of us to take supervisor wiener up on his suggestion to get an independent peer review. i turn this over to my colleague. >> good afternoon. my name is phoenix -- my name is felix lipman. i live in a condo behind the church. i have been a residence as 1995 in that location. we ask that you reject this application by at&t for the conditional use. at&t has not met the burden of proof to demonstrate that there is a significant coverage gap in t

mr. harris there. disney parent company of abc and abc 7 news. we remind you. >> let's go back. talk to spencerecast. looks like a great weekend spencer. >> you are right about. that sunny and mild. not at all like today. we had lots of clouds around. in the time lapse view from the east bay camera in emeryville. low clouds moving of the bay. not much rainfall in the clouds. it was damp today but not very wet. tomorrow will be dry all across the state and certainly mild down in southern california with high of 78 degrees at palm springs. 74 in los angeles and another mild day is coming our way here in the bay area as we wind down 2011. sunny skies. high pressure in the mid 60's mid to upper 60's in some spots as a matter of fact up to 67 degrees down in santa cruz and farther to the south near 70 at is a leap as. here's accu-weather 7 day forecast. we have several sunny dry mild days coming our way. but next thursday clouds thicken. chance of rain temperatures drop-off sharply. high thursday and friday only in the 50's which is more seasonal range and this signal the start of what should be a r

and lara spencer has much more on this expensive story. >> oh, yes. don't shed too many tears for mr jeopardy of going broke. but his bank account is certainly a lot smaller this morning, mm, by about half. by divorce standards, the divorce settlement is a whopper. robyn and mel gibson were married for nearly 30 years. during which time, the actor and director built up a net worth of $850 million. now, the former couple will reportedly split that down the middle, leaving them with each nearly a $500 million. according to "people" magazine, the couple had no prenup. >> marriage and prenups go together like peas and carrots in today's time. 30 years ago, prenups were never spoken of, let alone entered into. >> reporter: that catapults gibson to the top of a not-enviable heap. settlements between harrison ford and his ex-wife. steven spielberg, and amy irving. neil diamond and asha murphy. and michael jordan and his ex-wife, juanita. but it's less than what media mogul rupert murdoch to his ex, anna, in what is still the most expensive divorce in history. gibson had just filmed "mad max

34 of your statement dealing with earl spencer's complaint in relation to his wife receiving certain treatment? this his complaint was upheld by the pcc, and then mrpert murdoch gave a public statement which you set out in paragraph 34 where he said it is clear in this case that the young man -- i think that's you -- went over the top. i have no hesitation in making public this demonstration. now, i've reminded mr. morgan this is responsibility to the care with which he is an editor subscribes to in his employment. the company will not tolerate disrepute the best practices of popular journalism and then we'll return to that in a moment. may i ask you, though, a little bit in this first witness statement to deal with the issue of private investigators. we're now at paragraph 50 on our page 24202. you have no recollection of any personal involvement in use of private investigators during your time at the "news of the world." well, we're looking there at a period which, i think, was less than two years. to paragraph 51, "the daily mirror" would from time to time engage private investigators during my time as editor. such people were used for fact-che

34 of your statement dealing with earl spencer's complaint in relation to his wife receiving certain treatment? this his complaint was upheld by the pcc, and then mr. rupert murdoch gave a public statement which you set out in paragraph 34 where he said it is clear in this case that the young man -- i think that's you -- went over the top. i have no hesitation in making public this demonstration. now, i've reminded mr. morgan this is responsibility to the care with which he is an editor subscribes to in his employment. the company will not tolerate disrepute the best practices of popular journalism and then we'll return to that in a moment. may i ask you, though, a little bit in this first witness statement to deal with the issue of private investigators. we're now at paragraph 50 on our page 24202. you have no recollection of any personal involvement in use of private investigators during your time at the "news of the world." well, we're looking there at a period which, i think, was less than two years. to paragraph 51, "the daily mirror" would from time to time engage private investigators during my time as editor. such people were used for fact