mr. st. croix can you give the bush >> as regular meeting january 26, 2050 and a method of ethics complaint number 19 13115 the ethics commission made a determination that there is probable cause to believe the following violations of california governmental code and san francisco campaigning governmental conduct code and that respondents [inaudible] 2010 committed seven violations of california government code, section 84 200 for failing to file campaign statement for 60s by seven different required deadlines. one violation of california government conduct code section 84104 for failing to maintain campaign records for $61,791.33 expenditures and for 8007 or $50 in contributions. one violation of san francisco campaigning governmental can't code section 1.118 for failing to pay an expense in full with 180 days of the invoice and one violation of san francisco campaign and governmental conduct code days of the invoice and one violation of san francisco campaign and governmental conduct code section

mr. st. croix thinks form 700 will be searchable because that will make a big difference in terms of being able to see where the conflicts might exist. the grand jury also i recommended creating electronic database on contracts for the same reason. i would like to recommend that you ask for a budget whether you submit it now or now at least know what it would cost. currently, as i understand the process, if you receive the conduct notification by e-mail and then they are essentially put on the pdf so they're not searchable to go through in the same way you also be true on [inaudible] travel money. it's worth noting, it was an opinion from i believe it was the rimshot law firm that stated that no one may gift an official of more than $440. and right now there's an aggregate for the entire year. travel money is not excluded from that. yet, we know that we are seeing people who are giving five dollars are more for travel. how much more and for how militants in one of the gifts they give, we don't know