mr. stansburys comments and questions. i think that would be fair. if staff needs more time maybe continuing this to the next meeting is appropriate, but i think they should be amended to reflect commissioner stansbury's comments >> commissioner stansbury do you have any comments on your advocates? >> um, i appreciate the positive feedback on the conversation we had regarding this loan program. i do see there are several paragraphs on page 9 and 10 about questions that i asked. i'm agreeable to modifying-you think there is additional detail that should be included but don't feel strongly either way. if there are some things that maybe should be included that were not due to just constraints and space maybe it is worth a second look. >> there is a motion on the table to accept, so i think we need to resend that-- >> i second. i'm aminable to amend the second to incorporate commissioner stansbury's comments. i wanted to say that this is a important issue to patrick mu nay shah. he has gone through all this analysis and this isn't easy to take the minute

mr. stansburys comments and questions. i think that would be fair. e time maybe continuing this to the next meeting is appropriate, but i think they should be amended to reflect commissioner stansbury's comments >> commissioner stansbury do you have any comments on your advocates? >> um, i appreciate the positive feedback on the conversation we had regarding this loan program. i do see there are several paragraphs on page 9 and 10 about questions that i asked. i'm agreeable to modifying-you think there is additional detail that should be included but don't feel strongly either way. if there are some things that maybe should be included that were not due to just constraints and space maybe it is worth a second look. >> there is a motion on the table to accept, so i think we need to resend that-- >> i second. i'm aminable to amend the second to incorporate commissioner stansbury's comments. i wanted to say that this is a important issue to patrick mu nay shah. he has gone through all this analysis and this isn't easy to take the minute and list toon the

mr. stansburys comments and questions. i think that would be fair. if staff needs more time maybe continuing this to the next meeting is appropriate, but i think they should be amended to reflect commissioner stansbury's comments >> commissioner stansbury do you have any comments on your advocates? >> um, i appreciate the positive feedback on the conversation we had regarding this loan program. i do see there are several paragraphs on page 9 and 10 about questions that i asked. i'm agreeable to modifying-you think there is additional detail that should be included but don't feel strongly either way. if there are some things that maybe should be included that were not due to just constraints and space maybe it is worth a second look. >> there is a motion on the table to accept, so i think we need to resend that-- >> i second. i'm aminable to amend the second to incorporate commissioner stansbury's comments. i wanted to say that this is a important issue to patrick mu nay shah. he has gone through all this analysis and this isn't easy to take the minute

stansbury has warned you. thank you >> thank you, next speaker please. >> hello my name is sylva alvurez lynch and totally support what mr a pay to play scenario here as we have been exposed to a [inaudible] regarding the president administration. this type of investment doesn't help grow the retirement fund and has many pitfall squz believe isn't a sound invest frment the retire ease. also the mayor has 9 billion dollars inl sur plus funds, why does he need to come to us? i'm giving my general public comment last month to mr. huish and mickens for inclusion into the permanent meeting minutes for last month. thank you. >> thank you. mr. herbt wineer followed by mr. john furlong. >> herbt wineer, i will be brief. basically i oppose this proposal for the funding of housing because one, it doesn't seem like a fruitful invesment, if seems like a meager return and stretching it over a 30 year period and there is no advocacy from the mayors office before this board. in esens a lot of information can be lost in translaelgz to secondary sourceoffs advocacy and. also what is important if this is approved the body will be asked to