presentation and i thank you for your consideration of this item. >> supervisor tang: thank you, mr. starr. were there comment outreach or comments that the commission or department received on the potential extended hours of operation? >> there were no comments during the planning commission hearing. >> supervisor tang: supervisor kim? >> supervisor kim: i was curious what other types of uses fall under this category. >> supervisor tang: mostly, it's like your corner store that you see in residential districts. sometimes a restaurant or an architect's office. >> supervisor kim: legally nonconforming but grandfathered in in the '70s? >> right. and the board passed something that allowed them to be re-established if they go out of business. so then conditional use authorize can be obtained to open up in the commercial spaces again. >> supervisor kim: retail, low-impact office and spaces like these that are arts and -- is it general assembly, too? >> i'm not sure what chicken john's is considered. it must be a general entertainment or something like that. >> supervisor kim: thank you very mu

spoketime ago mr. starr with my colleagues katty kay and christian fraser. katty: what was he like to work with? a pleasure, privilege, extraordinarily bright, but also humble even though he w always at the top of his class academically.kn you would not that from chatting with him. s, lett's justou gejob done, very focused. he wouldn't take these cases one at a time, and he will listing was himself -- he would take these cases one on time and he will distinguish himself ot.the supreme katty: will he be someone difficult for democrats to vote against? ken: that is the huge question right now. the answer should be no because judge kavanaughed has ama magnificent record as a judge. some will be subject to controversy and the like. 12 years of11 or service. it is universally acclaimed as being in the middle of the jurisprudence of the unid states, inherited from the mother country in no small measure. he goes about hisork and such an amiable way that he i bvery well-likhis colleagues. he was recruitedaro teach at halaw school by now-justice elena kagan. he is a

in a couple of years mr. starr is your business but i. know you're lucky she will not back. the paper look listen can look up the locket opinion. will tell you this is what she commented lots of the questions on the phone and you know that they could also be the ink they have now would you let them into it with the perpendicular to. the lot of my mask and well i may just swallow what i. just mistrust or listen to. closely over some months. i'm. going to. go over to the appeal. and eight units of course i'll say look good luck up on new york was closely woody guthrie must see all this. way if you don't end up with video they need to start off from the scene about three years to prison or safeway and the all in the city thought oh hum oh see i'm la masia. prose plus you . know. i'll be stunted. got a good game on says but i couldn't be with you because i'm mildly suffering which. we're going to stand. still so you will boss me in the. last years does he years of us what she she doesn't include the people most of canossa on upload what i mean. in the military our. lives of it h

so mr. starr will be sending the file back to this committee and making amendments so tend it back to the planning commission for further conversation. but thank you, mr. fire marshal, for coming today. wanted to have a conversation about we have heard some general -- and i did convey this to you, some general concerns from project sponsors. and if you can speak a little bit about the fire code as it pertains to single-family homes versus multiunit properties and what the difference is. >> so with regards -- first of all, dan decostio, fire marshal. happy to be here. that's a good point to make that designation, where you have -- differentiate between an r. 3 which is a single-family or two dwelling units or a multifamily dwelling unit which is three or more units, which is more like an apartment building. so if it's an r 3, a single-family dwelling unit, and you're adding or proposing an a.d.u. for your home, an in-law unit, let's say, that does not fall in the jurisdiction of the state fire mars

mr. starr is your business but i. know you're lucky. the paper look listen can look up the locket opinion. this is what she commented lots of the questions of the phone you know but they could also be very careful now would you have come into it with the perpendicular to. notice when i'm asked and while i may just call what i. just missed just listen to. mental suppose someone. going to be the one who had to appeal to. the in school so say look good luck of the new york was tall slender body has got three months he told us. to be.

for more on his record and what we can expect if he becomes a justice — mr. starr joins us now.ork with? a privilege, extremely bright as you would expect but also quite humble. even though he was always at the top of his class academically, you would not know that from chatting with him. nota not know that from chatting with him. not a brighter, let'sjust get the job done, very practical, very focused, and as he said last evening he is going to take these cases one ata time he is going to take these cases one at a time and i think he's going to distinguish himself on the supreme court. has the presidentjust nominated someone who is going to be difficult for democrats to vote against? that is obviously the huge question right now. i think the answer should be no because judge cavanagh has amassed this magnificent record as the judge. —— brett kavanaugh. but look at his service, it is universally acclaimed as being... inherited from the mother country in no small measure. he also goes about his work in such an amiable way that he is very well liked by his colleagues, he was recru

starr? >> sean: mr. mayor, good to see you. i really do like the ring but i'm glad you had to pay for it though. that would have been controversial. when we come back in, president trump that up with the illegal immigration crisis at the southern border. we have drastic actions to show the way on that. this will be a key issue in 99 days, straight ahead. >> president trump: we need border security which includes the wall and includes many other things. we have to end of the lottery, we have to end of the chain. it's like a disaster, you bring one person in and you end up with 32 people. we have to and these horrible catch and release principles, where you catch somebody, if you take their name and he released them. you don't even know who they ar are. then it's supposed to come back to a court case where they want us to hire thousands of judges. the whole thing is ridiculous. we have to change our laws at least is that there are congress. so i would certainly be willing to close it down to get it done. >> sean: that was the pre

starr? [laughter] >> sean: mr. mayor, good to see it. i really do like the ring.lad that you had to pay for it, though. >> [laughs] >> sean: president trump fed up with the illegal immigration crisis at the southern border. we have drastic actions. michelle malkin weighs in on that. a key issue in 99 days. straight ahead. ♪ be -and we welcome back gary, who's already won three cars, two motorcycles, a boat, and an r.v. i would not want to pay that insurance bill. [ ding ] -oh, i have progressive, so i just bundled everything with my home insurance. saved me a ton of money. -love you, gary! -you don't have to buzz in. it's not a question, gary. on march 1, 1810 -- [ ding ] -frédéric chopin. -collapsing in 226 -- [ ding ] -the colossus of rhodes. -[ sighs ] louise dustmann -- [ ding ] -brahms' "lullaby," or "wiegenlied." -when will it end? [ ding ] -not today, ron. ♪ >> we need border security. border security includes the wall, but it includes many other things. we have to end the lottery, we have to end the chain. the chain is like a disaster. you bring one person

starr. is it very different from what mr. trump is doing? >> i think it's very different. nly they did raise -- they raised questions about his partisanship, but in this case, actually, the questions had some bearing, you know, ken starr was a conservative republican. donald trump and rudy giuliani have been referring to people like rod rosenstein and robert mueller and james comey as democrats, and talking about the angry democrats who are running these probes. those men are all republicans. so, there is absolutely no partisan bias driving this. and also, in the end, president clinton did wind up testifying and it looks like president trump will not. so, you know, this is clearly -- it's true, it's what he does to the media, he cries fake news, he cries democratic witch hunt, but you know, we'll see. i think that the mueller probe is proceeding very aggressively. there have already been 20 indictments. i really wouldn't shrug -- none of us are shrugging, but i wouldn't say this gambit of discrediting it is going to ultimately be successful. if he has the good, he's got the

er alcindor: later, stolte had a tenser exchange with moderator barbara starr of cnn on how mr. trump's comments impact nato cohesion. >> you know, i'm n a professor. i'm not a pundit. >> but you're the secretary general. >> yeah, meaning my task is to make sure we stay together so if i started to freely reflect on all the possibilities then i would undermine the unity of this alliance. so i have one responsibility and that is to make sure despite the obvious differences which you can read about in newspapers everyday we have tkeep this family together. >> alcdor: for his part, president trump freely acknowledged his rhetoric on defense spending might not endear him to other nato allies. >> because of me, they've raised about $40 billion over the last year. i hink the secretary general likes trump.ly he may be the ne, but wat's okay with me. >> alcindor: back hington, u.s. lawmakers sounded off about the presidential visit to nato. paul ryasaid he too has concerns about the russian energy pipeline and germany's defense spending. >> i've raised those same concerns about nord stre

starr, independent counsel, is investigating allegations that you suborn perjury by encouraging a 24-year-old woman, former white house intern, to lie under oath about her having had an affair with you. mre? >> that's not true. that is not true. >>> in the course of an investigation into the whitewater scandal, special prosecutor, kenneth starr would discover that clinton had an affair with an intern in the white house. >> kenneth starr opened a federal grand jury probe into allegations about the president's relationship with monica lewinsky and whether there was a coverup. >> what does all this have to do with whitewater and what is ken starr doing in this business? >> ken starr was going to pursue clinton until they caught him doing something and the something was monica lewinsky. >> a couple weeks ago a woman named linda tripp walked into ken starr's office and says, i have these tapes. i have about ten phone calls of a young woman named monica lewinsky and in it she talks about having had a sexual relationship with the president. >> monica lewinsky bares her soul about her love for bill clinton to her friend, linda tripp. linda tripp gives those tapes to paula jones' lawyers and ken

mr. kavanaugh, who worked with ken starr to go after bill clinton as president hammer and tong for alleged misdeeds, misconduct that he apparently had done. now, some 20 years later, that same brett kavanaugh seems to have rather than feeling that presidents definitely are not above the law, presidents have be to held accountable like anybody else, he seems to have done a 180 here and instead is basically seems to feel that presidents almost are above the law, cannot be held accountable. i don't get it. i don't know how someone can change on something that -- and it wasn't as if just during the starr years to have gone from that position, to be such a fervent attack dog going after bill clinton to basically saying the president is pretty much do without oversight what they see fit. i just -- and that's one of the issues i want to discuss with brett -- judge kavanaugh when i meet with him later this -- hopefully later this month. but for that reason alone, judge kavanaugh's views of the president and whether the president is above the law, i think for that reason alone especially at this po

starr from planning to come back up. >> thank you. >> supervisor safai: thank you, mr. decostio. so i wanted to ask they're coming to fire and to planning and to you. is there any way that planning could help to facilitate bringing -- since it seems as though fire marshal needs to weigh in on some of these issues earlier, is there a way that we can bring them in earlier into the process? is that possible? >> i believe there is. it's not really up to planning. we're just one review agency in the process, and d.b.i. is the controller of that process. >> supervisor safai: when we had the conversation about -- when we had the conversation recently about pop outs and notification and mandatory neighborhood notification, do these d.b.i. -- do they go through a mandatory notification when they -- i see someone on your staff. >> i'm going to let marselle -- >> hi. marselle boudreaux. i just wanted to comment briefly on the combined preapplication meeting component of supervisor tang's legislation that i believe has been carved out, maybe duplicated, but it's a conversation that we've bee

mr. kavanaugh. now, on independent counsel, you have some criticism of the structure of independent counsel on the operation you had with judge starr, and that is why you made some recommendations for changes, right? brett kavanaugh: that's correct, mr. chairman. >> and you have a value not to exclude blacks, african americans, on peremptory challenges. that is your value. brett kavanaugh: yes, mr. chairman, and i believe in properprocedures to make sure that racial bias does not occur in the courtroom in the jury selection process. >> ok. my red light went on on round two. i will yield now to senator leahy. >> you know, the reason i kept asking about your taking 7months to answer the questions and why i found your answer inadequate, you did spend years vetting judicial nominees up here and telling them what they were supposed to do and everything else. and it is difficult to understand, having told them how they are supposed to answer, that you did not understand yourself. be that as it may, tomorrow the white house is finally going to release its logs of visitors to the white house, having been forced by a federal judge to do so,

mr. trump preparing to walk away from 70 years of defense cooperation? jake? >> all right. barbara starr in brussels, thanks so much. let's bring back the panel. it's so odd listening to secretary mattis talk about nato and president trump talk about nato. it's almost as if they work for a different administration. take a listen to kay bailey hutchinson, the current u.s. ambassador to nato. >> we are a deterrence alliance and being strong is the best deterrence. that's why i think it's so important to show the strength, show the unity. i think the discord is music to putin's ears. >> scott, how do you explain the fact that kay bailey hutchison is criticizing president trump in a way? criticizing the discord. he is a main people causing the discord? >> secretary and general mattis have to deal with nato as we work through our logistical mutual defense pact. president trump is on the negotiating side because it is true the allies with the few exceptions not meeting the obligations and the secretary-general of nato today gave a speech and thanked donald trump for pushing the rest of the all

mr. president, i am grateful to you and humbled by your confidence in me. >> kavanaugh, a conservative choice, serving key positions in the bush white house. and the independent counsel on ken starr's team. investigating bill clinton. later having second thoughts about whether presidents should be subjected to prosecution and investigations. a stance that could be a big deal if the supreme court ever has to rule on any actions resulting from the russia investigation. but a major question still lingers. the future of roe v. wade. legalized abortion. kavanaugh highlighting the achievements of the women in his life while also trying to clear up any misconceptions about what he may do to current law. >> a judge must interpret statutes as written and a judge must interpret the constitution as written, informed by history and tradition and precedent. >> activists protesting his nomination on the court steps. >> democratic senators also there. >> president trump did exactly what he said he was going to do. he has appointed someone who will not protect a woman's right to make decisions about her life, her health care, her reproductive freedom. >> kavanaugh is set to meet with senators toda

starr at the pentagon. barbara, the d.i.a. has a different take than the president. >> you bet they do. you'll remember mr.mp said before the summit before he sat down with kim that he would know within a minute if kim jong-un was serious about all of this. well, not so fast. the d.i.a., the military intelligence agency says their latest assessment is kim won't give up his nuclear weapons and instead for now will try and hide what he has. and that is absolutely critical. if he can hide missiles, if he can hide warheads, if he can hide his ability to make nuclear fuel, this makes it very difficult for the u.s. under any circumstances to know what's going on inside north korea. they think he's likely to sign some sort of document, to sit and talk to the u.s. as long as possible. you know, why wouldn't he? he can string it out for months. but to actually give up his nukes, to let inspectors in, to verify what is there. to make an honest and candid declaration of what he has, the pentagon is skeptical about all of that right now. i believe they believe that the key would be is kim really feeling the pain of sa

mr. president, i am grateful to you and i'm humbled by your confidence in me. >> reporter: kavanaugh, a conservative choice serving key positions in the bush white house and the independent counsel on ken starr's team investigating bill clinton. later having second thoughts about whether presidents should be subjected to prosecution and investigations. a stance that could be a big deal if the supreme court ever has to rule on any actions resulting from the russia investigation. but a major question still lingers, the future of roe v. wade, legalized abortion, kavanaugh highlighting the achievements of the women in his life while also trying to clear up any misconceptions about what he may do to current law. >> a judge must interpret statutes as written, and a judge must interpret the constitution as written informed by history and tradition and precedent. >> reporter: activists protesting his nomination on the court steps. [ chanting ] democratic senators also there. >> president trump did exactly what he said he was going to do, he has appointed someone who will not protect a woman's right to make decisions about her life, her health care, her reproductive freedom. >> reporter: kavanaugh said

mr. kavanaugh, thank you for your thoughts on the senator feinstein question about the starr investigation i think you've provided some good insight, and i think that probably is the reason why your putation as a member of that prosecutorial team was very high. and people had a clear impression that you were a cool head and a wise member of that team and that's the reputation i've heard. i can see why you had that. i would note that ken starr was united licitor of the states. a man of legal skill. anyone would have been proud to answer his call to serve him. looking at the a.b.a. evaluation, i think first of l, you did extremely well, extraordinarily well. in the sense that you were relatively young and were working in an administration, the bush administration. you were given the highest possible rating by them. and you've been there now. and in a less legal capacity and a few more new members and a few members decided to give you the qualified rating and instead of a well qualified rating. but i don't think that's a big issue. i would question steven tolbert, the chairman of the judiciar

brett kavanaugh worked with ken starr on the investigation and not only does he have a keen sense of what mrings to the table, but maybe some insights into this investigation with mueller. and investigations that might go away from the origin tent. he's coming up. in the meantime, labor i -- larry sabato. we're looking at the developments, back and forth, should the president meet with president putin. should he not? generally it's better for world leaders, if they hate each other, even if they don't, to meet. but what do you think? >> i agree with that. i don't think you can cancel a summit just a few days before because of the new indictments of those 12 russians connected to russian intelligence. this is a perfect opportunity for president trump to get ahead of this story at last by confronting putin. you don't have to do it in a terribly nasty way, but you confront him, challenge him, not just to cooperate with whatever investigations we have or we know he's not going to extradite them, but you can ask for that, but tell him very clearly what the sanctions are going to be if the russians

starr's investigation of clinton. and before all of that. he clerked for the justice. chose in off to succeed. a point he mentioned first in his remarks tonight. mr. president, i am grateful to you, and i'm humbled by your confidence in me. 30 years ago, president reagan nominated anthony kennedy to the supreme court. the framers established that the constitution is designed to secure the blessings of liberty. justice kennedy devoted his career to securing liberty. i am deeply honored to be nominated to fill his seat on the supreme court. >>> judge kavanaugh does not have a paper trail to speak of on marriage rights. on the record if a president should be shielded from criminal litigation until they leave office. he has the written that, they should. that, that, could of course been consequential. in any event. as you saw at the top his nomination sparked protests already. already lobbying is under way by the white house to overcome it. the target. wavering republicans and red state democrats. phil mattingly. what's the react they're getting so far. they will align with chuck schumer. what it comes down to right now is five senators. two republic

starr is joining me with more on this. make sense of this for me. >> reporter: the defense intelligence agency here at the pentagon, they're aware of what the president said. mr. trump has said he would sit down with kim and know right away what his intentions were and if he was going to denuclearize. maybe not so fast. according to the intelligence is that kim has no intention of doing that, at least not right now. he may well sign some sort of agreement with the u.s. but the imagery they have, the intelligence they have, the electronic intercepts is indicating that kim plans for now to try and deceive the u.s., try to hide away his missiles, his warheads. this is what he has done for years. for the dia, not a big surprise. the white house still very much holding to an optimistic view. listen to john bolton and what he had to say over the weekend. >> we have developed a program, i'm sure that secretary of state mike pompeo will be discussing this with the north koreans in the near future about really how to dismantle their programs in a year. if they have the strategic decision already made to do that and they're cooperative, we can move very quickly. >> if

mr. kavanaugh, thank you for your thoughts on the senator feinstein question about the starr investigation. i think you've provided some good insight, and i think that probably is the reason why your putation as a member of that prosecutorial team was very high. and people had a clear impression that you were a cool head and a wise member of that team and that's the reputation i've heard. i can see why you had that. i would note that ken starr was united licitor of the states. a man of legal skill. anyone would have been proud to answer his call to serve him. looking at the a.b.a. evaluation, i think first of l, you did extremely well, extraordinarily well. in the sense that you were relatively young and were working in an administration, the bush administration. you were given the highest possible rating by them. and you've been there now. and in a less legal capacity and a few more new members and a few members decided to give you the qualified rating and instead of a well qualified rating. but i don't think that's a big issue. i would question steven tolbert, the chairman of the judicia

starr knows that the president has to give a deposition in the jones case. >> part of the danger for the president lies in what he said under oath to lawyers for paula jones. mrving a sexual relationship with lewinsky. >> did the president agree with lewan can i to deny their affair under oath? >> if the president in fact encouraged this woman to lie under oath or asked someone else to encourage her, that's a crime. >> it is a different order of magnitude from any of the previous charges the president has had to put up with the last several years. >> what the white house is in for is another legal nightmare. >> there was a howl coming up in the media and from republicans. people horrified at this. it was overpowering. >> i want you to listen to me. i'm going to say this again. i did not have sexual relations with that woman. ms. lewinsky. i never told anybody to lie, not a single time, never. these allegations are false and i need to go back to work for the american people. thank you. [ applause ] >> i think from the very beginning the people who knew him the best f they were honest with themselves, knew something had happened. >> why do you think that in the

starr hopkins, is that your worry as a democratic strategist? you aren't a fan of the things he was dismantling with the president's blessing. none of that seems to be likely to change under mrrmanent replacement. what do you think? >> i mean the policies of the report going to be put in place whether it's pruitt or mr. wheeler. i will say scott pruitt, is indicative of the behavior that trump was supposed to clean up. but has now become the poster child for that very swampish trump enterprise. what i think we're seeing is the reason the democratic wave is getting ready to happen. 18 point enthusiasm gap among democrats and republicans. democrats winning in red states, purple states, blue states. >> neil: you're almost acting like the last week never happened. you have been stumbling more than me out of the veggie bar. what do you think? >> i feel pretty good where democrats are at. >> neil: harland, he mentioned the swamp reference, chuck schumer said took you long enough, a long way to go to fully drain the swamp. what do you think? . the president cannot win. he either acts too hastily or took too long. this is a reflection of the fact in if this administration you become

mr. cohen setup a lot of them, some of his other lawyers setup other ones. robert mueller needs to look at every single one of them. robert mueller is not going to make the mistake ken starr did getting all mixed up -- yes, we've got a pervert in the white house. but he's going to focus on the money that kmuz from foreign nationals. if there's money that's going to be prosecuted. that's mueller's job, not focusing on the sex. >>> coming up when chief of staff john kelly blatantly lied about a congresswoman frederica wilson offered a fiery response right here on "all in." i'm a four-year-old ring bearer with a bad habit of swallowing stuff. still won't eat my broccoli, though. and if you don't have the right overage, you could be paying for that pricey love band yourself. so get an allstate agent, and be better protected from mayhem. like me. can a ring bearer get a snack around here? your privacy makes you myt number 1 place to go number 2. i love you, but sometimes you stink. febreze air effects doesn't just mask, it cleans away odors. because the things you love the most can stink. and try febreze small spaces to clean away odors for up to 30 days. breathe happy with fe

mr. rosenstein? i could make two corrections. i spent 28 years in federal law years in the 9 service of government. sometimes i round it up to 30. with regard to the starr investigation i would take issue your suggestion that they produced nothing. as you may be aware i worked in that investigation. involved in a trial that resulted in the conviction of three defendants for fraud. as i arr investigation discuss in my letter of yesterday is somewhat different. director mueller understands here is to keep the investigation focused, and to conclude it as expeditiously possible. >> and i appreciate that, and, of course, the purpose of any criminal investigation is ultimately, and we need to allow law enforcement to roceed on its own terms following the rules and the procedures of law enforcement in at a just rive result. but, the whole suggestion here today is that there is some kind of partisan conspiracy afoot. let me just ask you just to be it, is there a republican partisan conspiracy highest ranks of law enforcement, the department of justice, against a republican president? >> no. okay. >> do you believe that the complaints that are being directed at