mr. stevenson would say under 14. the lawyers for arkansas and alabama said, well, maybe 12. >> ifill: is the argument that younger children or younger teenagers shouldn't be held as accountable as older ones? >> mr. stevenson would say based on the cours earlier decisions in this area that the deficits juveniles have in judgment and maturity are not crime-specific. it doesn't matter if it's murder or a non-murder crime. those characteristics apply to all juveniles under the age of 18. he said you cannot equate kids with adults. >> ifill: we're talking once again about justice kennedy as being the pivot point but not just because he's the random guy in the middle but because he's actually had a lot to say about these kinds of cases. >> he has. in fact, he wrotehe lt tw decisions involving the juvenile death penalty and life without prison... life in prison without parole for juveniles who do not commit murder. so, yes, he's going to be very pivotal here. the one thing that he seemed concerned about and several other j