mr. stewart: it is hard for me to say.nk our own company has a number of unique, positive characteristics, which made the market more attractive for us. beyond that, it is hard to say what the perception would be beyond this. betty: james, you know, the back story on all of this is -- the ipo is not primarily because of this, but we know the activist investors had been pushing for mgm resorts to unlock more value. this is one move. they put out a statement earlier where they said "mgm resorts had taken a half step to unlock the volume of mgm. it is perfecting why ceo jim murren would not go all the way and decisively unlock the inherent value in mgm resorts." what do you say? mr. stewart: i think the way we have done it is actually very creative, and an ingenious way that will turn to be positive for investors. the revenue of the company, which is the rent that mgm pays is covered 3.7 times by mgm resorts. part of the way we accomplished this incredibly large cushion to our rent payment is through keeping the mgm grand, th

mr. stewart to prevail in this case. is thedicament predicament. it is a predicament that comes from the clean water act. thing process is the only -- the only thing it is supposed to do is give you more information so that you can make the choices that the statute puts to your. >> it does more than that. honor, thett, your second prong of finality is satisfied if any of three requirements are met. number one, a right is determined, or an obligation is determined, or legal consequences flow. by virtue of the adjudicative determination in this case, if obligation has been established, that they cannot use 150 acres of their property without being obliged to get a permit, -- >> that is the question. whether there is any obligation or if it is simply information about will happen given different courses of action. >> the clean water act itself doesn't say anything about this particular property. the clean water act doesn't cover all waters. if only way to find out there are jurisdictional waters which will trigger the requirement or a permit is to go

mr. stewart, the ascii, is don't panic by asking this question. and please don't resist because i know all of you arguments resisting it. but assuming we disagreed with you that they should be appealable, which then there is way to write this that the government would like? >> if the court ruled against us on the ground that it understood the epa and the corps to have entered into a binding agreement, such that the epa would be foreclosed from taking action based on its disagreement with the corps' jurisdictional determination can i think of that whether a pain and it would be one that if the agencies wanted to fix it, they easily could simply by issuing a new moa clarifying their view of the jd's defect. >> on the same lines, can i ask what generally, one of the reason i find this case for typical is because all over the federal government to our complaints offices of various kinds whose function is to give advice to people. often that advice comes with very specific recommendations. it says we will not take enforcement action if, or, we do not c

mr. stewart writes, i was told by mr.efferson that the greater part of the papers in this collection were written by mr. madison. mary: that is a wonderful book that they have there. at the time they were published anonymously, but lots of people in the know suspected it, but madison sends some of them down to washington and sends like, hint, hint, you'll know who writes this. and after they became famous, washington used to say they were important. madison and hamilton disagreed over which ones they wrote and after hamilton's death it was discovered that hamilton said he written some of them and madison said i wrote some of them. for many years, historians disagree. nowadays they agree on the essence. but some of the ones in the agreeing were written together. ryan: check these numbers out. i looked it up and i do not remember what the source was, but hamilton 51, madison 26. mary: hamilton wrote most of those in the beginning before he -- madison -- joined on. and madison wrote five before he writes his great essay numb

mr. stewart: the issue of cost effectiveness is a good one. what do other countries do? the u.k., which has a high terrorism threat, spends about half on the gdp basis than what is happening here. they seem to be just as effective. australia and canada, we spend gdpt 1/4 as a portion of per capita, and they seem to do a fine job as well. the united states seems to be fairly excessive. i can say that and still be un-american. of quantifying cost-benefit, that will be a challenge. ph.d. topicsed 20 dissolve this. estimation, robust to give you a20%, feel of what side you are on. money, andly western if it is in the middle, you need to spend more resources to pan that out. the value of life in the analysis, and the number varies a lot to different government agencies, up to 10 million. we use 7.5 million from just based on the report done in 2010. most of the losses from terrorism, that is obviously extremely tragic, that in terms of cost-benefit analysis, what affects society is the indirect losses due to people becoming risk adverse, deciding not to travel, affects touris

mr. stewart. >> mr. chief justice, and may please the court.jurisdictional determination issued by the army corps of engineers is not final agency action because it doesn't or to any person to do or refrain from doing anything and does not alter anyone's legal rights and obligations. the jurisdictional determination expresses the course of opinion about whether a particular tract contains water protected by the clean water act. that's the opinion that affect the recipients assessment of the options of able to get but it does not affect the actual legal status of those options. this court's precedents make clear that the practical effects of which responded rely on a sufficient ground for creating an agency communication as final agency action. the respondents primarily emphasize the practical impact that the corps' of jurisdictional determination would have upon themselves to the recipients and the intended audience. they say the jurisdictional determination indicating that the court believes that our waters of the trinitron the property will f

mr. stewart, thanks to you. i think in the past you've talked up norway. >> you talk about a norway model. >> comment on this, the prime minister of norway has said that norway didn't work for the united kingdom. >> norway is not the world's fifth larnlest economy, and norway is not the fit largest defense budget. and it doesn't have a permanent seat in the u.n. and it doesn't have a seat on the imf and all the other things. i think if you may have heard me talk about norway in the sense that i said if you were to do a mind test on intervention, it's more integrated. my point is that when you make these comparisons, you need to be careful because this is a situation where size does matter. these are three big countries and we have influence. once we go down the road of political infiltration that you can become integrated and not integrated and it would still work. now malcolm rifkin has made it quite clear that has come to an end with the euro. you require a european government. and if the euro doesn't work, i

mr. jefferson, from servant, john jay. and then next, stewart, the for mr. jefferson. so thomas jefferson gave his to stewart, the scottish philosopher, and mr. stewart i was told by mr. jefferson that the greater part of the papers in this collection were written by mr. madison. >> so that's a wonderful book they have there. at the time they were published anonymously. but lots of people in the know suspected that they were madison jefferson's. and madison actually, i think, sends some of them down to sort ofon and friends like, hint, hint. you'll know who writes this. and afterwards, as they became increasingly famous -- washington used to say that they were important -- madison and hamilton eventually disagreed which ones they wrote. death, ithamilton's was discovered that hamilton said he had written some of them and then madison said, no, i of them.e and so for many years, there were some that historians disagree on, even today. nowadays, most historians agree on most of the essays. but some of the ones in the beginning were written by both them together. >> check

stewart stewart mr. speaker, the b.l.m. announced that it would significantly cut grazing allotments and eliminate all cattle grazing. to accommodate the overpopulation of wild horses. many in my district are facing with the identical situation where wild horses are taking over the ranges. i grew up ranching and riding horses and i desperately want to protect them but with 50,000 wild horses on ranges in the west, which is double what the land can sustain, the ranges are overgrazed and now horses are starving to death. not only are the current conditions inhumane, but due to overpopulation, the federal government is forced to house additional 50,000 horses at a cost of $55,000 per horse. i want to ask my colleagues to join with me to look for solutions to this problem. one solution is my bill, the wild horse oversight act, which would simply allow states to borrows. d horses and if you care about these horses like i do, then help me solve the problem. if you care about these ranges and how these horses are destroying the ra

mr. roldugan, it bears the name stewart. >> he is popular but used instriemts.eed this is a used instrument. it's been used since 1732 the owner was frederick the great. but i would like to calm down the people looking for sensation. he doesn't have any money anymore. now who is interested in those media provocations? we know there are american officials behind some of those provocations. yesterday i asked my press where this first appeared and it was a german newspaper owned by goldman sachs, an american company, american bank. it's about our country in general ash country that will not toe their line, a country that refuses to bend down but if our counterparts seek compromise and if they're prepared toreat us with respect, then we are always willing to come halfway and find a solution that will benefit and satisfy both parties. that is the only way to deal with us as an ewall partner. >> translator: here a question, who is worse, clinton or trump for russia? >> translator: you know, we need to look for the best options. i can be only respond in the same way th

mr. szubin's mentor bush administration under secretary stewart levy was confirmed by the senate three weeks after his nomination came to the banking committee when the democrats were in control of this senate. mr. szubin's immediate predecessor took the senate just two and a half months to consider. this is a critical national security post. it must be filled permanently. szubin heads what's in effect treasury's economic war room, managing u.s. efforts to combat terrorist financing and fight financial crimes. he leads the charge to choke off isil's funding sources and prevent it from developing additional capacity to strike targets around the world. cutting off the money supply, including profits from illicit oil sales, money laundering, extortion and other crimes by isis actor ss a critical part of our strategy to defeat this terrorist organization. he works to hold iran to its commitment under the nuclear deal, to lead a campaign against the full range of iran's other terrorizing and destructive and destabilizing activities, including its support for hezbollah and other terror proxies. he

stewart to go next. >> thank you, chelsea. as maya just emphasized, process s important. mr. butler: as was said, roughly 2/3 of the spend right now is monday tear -- mandatory programs which has different rules to how they're developed than the rest of the budget. and the social security and medicare programs, major entitlements for the elderly are now roughly half the the entire federal budget itself. that's really important in its implications. that means that these programs are on auto pilot, whereas major and important programs like defense, like money for the homeless, for students, and so on, are argued over every year in the traditional budget process itself. meanwhile, these other entitlement programs, sort of like the mighty mississippi, keep rolling on. without any -- unless there are major changes made in those programs. they mentioned the national budgeting round table that the three of russ on, which is an organization that kicks around ideas on the budget process and we argue over them and then some of them are put together in proposals, some of which you have

mr. ross, i want to stewart you. because you mentioned the key point here is most of the testify you faulked about going o offense. you're talking about helping going -- have america have an offense. >> i want to talk about actually going into offense. i want to talk about the fact that you said that this has been uilding in sir and attack. >> as we walk the events unfold here. they're gaining in syria. they're getting into afghanistan. we're having boca ha ram and other terrorist dorgsdrgs. that is growing. i want to talk about an effective offense. i want to give an indication there. very study your terrorism. response to it. >> i realize these statistics are very une67b. but if you take a look at pry has ears up to 911, this average and protein. hey're left with 5,000 fatal tins. . in 2014 there was about 40. i dnd realize the measure is about to give cold. but it gives us some indication on hoe it is a growing threat. i don't see how we can succeed. just speak about -- what's a real offense to white out this thre

campaign structure, national field director, stewart jolly resigned, seeing reports corey lewandowski, campaign manager's role, reduced to scheduling, assisting mrs all of that true? does he have a reduced role now? >> i don't know the answer, i'm not part of the campaign. mr. trump, being the huber billionaire, businessman moog that he is, you need to improvise, adapt to different situations. right now there is an attempt by the cruz camp and others to deprive mr. trump of what the people want, for him to be the nominee for the republican party. he brought in additional party. it's no different than on a construction site. if in fact you need more people to build faster, so you come in ahead of time or under budget, that's what mr. trump does. he improvises and he's incredibly successful and astute at doing things like this. >> michael cohen, thanks for joining us. >>> john kasich who ran second in the new york polls tonight, he's in analyst, maryland, holding a town hall, gets under way 30 minutes. joining us, trent duffy. thanks for joining us. what are kasich's expectations for new york? maryland is a week from today. what about new york? >>

stewart's lawyers made. she told one lie to one fbi agent in one conversation, she went to prison. but mrs.on has said many times i can't wait to talk to the fbi. so if they invite her in and she does not go in, the prudent legal advice, she will be placing herself in political jeopardy because then we know i can't wait to talk to the fbi was another one of her lies. and the image will be what is she hiding that she doesn't want to talk to the fbi? she can't win this. bill: if she is not charged, the government put out a report? do they release findings to tell the public why they did this or did -- >> that is a great question. not officially, but i think in her case unofficially. meaning members of the justice department community who believe she should be indicted will probably leak the information on which that belief has been based. bill: that's possible. so the interviews are damned if you do, damned if you don't. >> yes. she's in a very difficult position, and i don't know how she can win it. i do know when she says things like i've told fbi i can't wait to talk to them, that demeans

that's the martha stewart case in an ordinary conversation with the fbi, she lied, she was prosecuted. she went to jail for it. mrsinton says she can't wait to talk to the fbi. >> she has to say that. she's running for president. the other thing is she keeps bringing up this analogy with col colin powell. is that true? >> he occasionally used his personal g mail account to mun kmat -- communicate with people in the state department occasionally. alberto gonzales once brought some documents home in his briefcase and reported himself the next day. >> she had her own server. big difference. >> thank you, judge. >> i like to get him fired up. >> no kidding. >>> george clooney raised millions of dollars for hillary clinton's campaign. now we might know why because donald trump hurt her feelings? eric trump joins us with that and much more at the top of the hour. >>> then, steve told us he used to cook -- he used to make his breakfast on his car radiator. we're going to go live and put him to the test. >> you can do it. i'm going to show you how to do ittest. >> brian says it tastes like corvette. >> tastes like jeep. r