mr. stewart of utah, mr. stewart will vote yes. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does gentlelady from new hampshire seek recognition? >> as the member designated by ms. pingree, ms. leger fernandez, they will vote yes. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does gentlelady from florida seek recognition? >> as the member designated by ms. salazar will vote yes on h.r. 720. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> as the member designated by congress members barragan, cardenas, jacobs and suozzi, they will vote yes on h. res. 720. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. katko of new york and mr. upton, they will vote yes on h. res. 720. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from maryland seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. brown of maryland, mr. brown will vote yes on h. res. 720. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman

mr. stewart, two quick questions. please explain the difference between the keystone pipeline and the keystone xl and whether or not president biden has actually shut down either. guest: great question. it seems to catch everybody's attention. i find infrastructure in -- pipeline infrastructure in north america is pipeline. those two lines are part of the same system what was needed was for that last segment to be approved to get it from canada, to oklahoma, to the gulf. the administration essentially killed the project because of the time delay that would take place. they sent not do it while we are in office, possibly an 8 year delay. that was a troubling signal to our closest partner that we were not going to participate with them appeared it had ramifications not just for the pipeline but for broader energy infrastructure. that is why if you hear the industry being worried about being the banked were not funded -- debanked host: the pipeline would not have increased capacity for years. guest: it would have taken s

mr. stewart, i inform the house that mr. stewart -- >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. stewart, i inform the house that mr. stewart will vote nay on h.r. 6929. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the distinguished gentleman from colorado seek recognition? mr. neguse: as the member designated by mr. casten, ms. williams, ms. bass, and ms. mrs. cherfilus-mccormick, i inform the house and the distinguished speaker from the great state of ohio that these four members will vote yes on h.r. 6929. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the distinguished gentleman from virginia seek mek rec anything -- seek recognition? mr. beyer: as the member designated by mr. desaw, mr. jones of -- mr. desaulnier, mr. blumenauer ms. moore, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on h.r. 6929. the speaker pro tempore: for what reason does the distinguished gentleman from the distinguished gentleman from georgia seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. rush and mr. thompson, i inform the house that they will both vote yes on h.r. 6929. the speaker pro

mr. stewart, ms. letlow, mrs. mcmorris rodgers, owens, conaway, herrera beutler, curtis, i inform the house that they will all vote yea on the motion to recommit. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? mr. takano: mr. speaker, as the member designated by representatives lloyd doggett and ilhan omar, i inform the house that these members will vote no on the motion to recommit. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlelady from california seek recognition? ms. matsui: as the member designated by ms. -- >> as the member designated by mrs. steel of california, i inform the house that mrs. steel will vote yea on the motion to recommit. -- mrs. kim: as the member designated by mrs. steel of california, i inform the house that mrs. steel will vote yea on the motion to recommit. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlelady from florida seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. waltz and mr. i had mens of florida, -- mr. gim

mr. stewart and curtis, they will vote nay. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new jersey seek recognition? mr. pallone: as the member designated by mrs. kirkpatrick, mr. sires, mr. pascrell, mr. doyle and mr. payne, these members mr. williams: vote yes. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from indiana seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. gibbs of ohio, i inform the house that mr. gibbs will vote nay. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? >> as the member designated by chairwoman johnson and chairman meeks, these members will vote yes on h.r. 8296. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from south carolina seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. timmons, i inform the house that mr. timmons will vote nay. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from new hampshire seek recognition? >> as the memberdesignated by ms. pingree, ms. kelly, mr. pappas a

mr. stewart. we're gonna move into what you see numerous top political expert, dimitri babich didn't believe in rosa, forbear. at 1st the ussr spoke of western ante, soviet isn't, but that didn't mean russians or she gets too young to me. now with big rush, i forgot about centers, which in years she davis, i. e o, social cargo socialist, precise depression and you go, i really cool. you stuck with me unless you're open to meeting with shane, you stood the bust, omi of pico vidalia. don't receive that, or kaltura has deal, flew over, i got lost, get on my monkey up almo stool. mortgage of almost all is we need is a state, and he is not supposed to mean use. and when our civil to beach no matter how much they apologized, russians whenever popular and even in the 21st century are often judged by what was written hundreds of years ago. the american statesman speak new brzezinski to form a u. s. presidential national security advisor. when speaking of russia raised the marquis de christine's books, whi

mr. stewart of utah, i inform the house that mr. stewart will vote nay on the rule.he speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? >> as the member designated by chairman gregory meeks and representative cori bush, i inform the house that these members will vote yea on h.res. 1256. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from colorado seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. castin, ms. williams, and ms. bass i inform the house and the distinguished parliamentarian, mr. smith, that these three members will vote yes on h.res. 1256. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from the commonwealth of kentucky seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. guthrie, i inform the house that mr. guthrie will vote no on the rule. the speaker pro tempore: on this vote the yeas are 218 and the nays are 207. the resolution is adopted. without objection, the motion to reconsider is laid on the table. the speaker pro tempore: pursuant to clause 8 of rule

mr. stewart making to put out p information that a lot of americans are not aware of. for example to give you one example then i will interested. probably more careful there's lots more to tell. >> as for you, that is the process of my industry here over and over again from people. for them att church, my neighborhood, c-span. i will be the to admit despite aour best efforts still strugge to give a good message out there. you hit out a really good point oil produced in the united states isat the cleanest barrelf oil anywhere in the world. even in north dakota for example. north dakota requires 96% of all emissions are captured in north dakota. you don't find that venice will or any wealth during that period the reality is i remember early my career we sat down and counted the number of state, federal, local laws of the company needed to comply with could begin producing is 127 at a time for that the very, very rigorous to angelo's point and pursued the opportunity to tell that story right now there. >> a viewer from twitter asks what happened to us oil in saudi arabia,

mr. stewart of utah, i inform the house that mr. stewart will vote no on h.res. 1289. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from virginia seek recognition? mr. beyer: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. evans, mr. thompson of california, mr. desaulnier, mr. jones of new york, ms. moore of wisconsin, mr. blumenauer, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on h.res. 1289. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from kentucky seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. guthrie from the commonwealth of kentucky, i inform the house that mr. guthrie will vote nay on the rule. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from new york seek recognition? ms. velazquez: mr. speaker, as the member designated by representative meeks from new york, and pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that representative meeks will vote yes on the rule for h.r. 1289. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from colorado seek recognition? mr. neguse: mr. spe

mr. stewart, two quick questions.e explain the difference between the keystone pipeline and the keystone xl and whether or not president biden has actually shut down either. guest: great question. it seems to catch everybody's attention. i find infrastructure in -- pipeline infrastructure in north america is pipeline. those two lines are part of the same system what was needed was for that last segment to be approved to get it from canada, to oklahoma, to the gulf. the administration essentially killed the project because of the time delay that would take place. they sent not do it while we are in office, possibly an 8 year delay. that was a troubling signal to our closest partner that we were not going to participate with them appeared it had ramifications not just for the pipeline but for broader energy infrastructure. that is why if you hear the industry being worried about being the banked were not funded -- debanked host: the pipeline would not have increased capacity for years. guest: it would have taken several

mr. stewart of utah, i inform the house that mr. stewart will vote no on h.res. 1300. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from virginia seek recognition? mr. connolly: madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. beyer of virginia, i inform the house that mr. beyer will vote aye on h.res. 1300. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from tennessee seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. jacobs of new york, mr. green of tennessee and mr. van drew of new jersey, i inform the house that mr. jacobs and mr. green and mr. van drew all will vote anyway on the rul. thank you. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from maryland seek recognition? mr. trone: madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. boyle, mr. ruppersberger, mrs. trahan, mr. mceachin, ms. newman and mre that these members will vote yes on h.r. 1300. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from south carolina seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. joe wilson fro

mr. stewart of utah, i inform the house that mr. stewart will vote no on h.r. 4346. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from tennessee seek recognition? mr. fleischmann: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. green of tennessee, i inform the house that mr. green will vote nay on h.r. 4346. thank you. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? mr. correa: mr. speaker, as the member designated by congress members kahele, bourdeaux, vargas, andy levin, and barragan, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on concurring in the senate amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from indiana seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mrs. walorski of indiana, i inform the house that mrs. walorski will vote no on h.r. 4346. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? m mr. webster: -- mr. weber: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. john carter from the great state of texas, i infor

mr. moore, stewart and they will vote yes on h.r. 6552. e speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from indiana seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mrs. walorski of indiana, she will vote yes on h.r. 6552. the speaker pro tempore: on this vote is 401 and the bill is passed and without objection, the motion to reconsider is laid on the table. pursuant to clause 8 of rule 20, the vote on the motion from mr. beyer to suspend the rules on which the yeas and nays are ordered the clerk will report the title. leashing clerk h.r. 71289 a bill to provide for the national academies to report to advance the understanding of pmp fast and for other purposes. the speaker pro tempore: will the bill pass the bill. this is a five-minute vote. [captioning made possible by the national captioning institute, inc., in cooperation with the united states house of representatives. any use of the closed-captioned coverage of the house proceedings for political or commercial purposes is expressly prohibited by the u.s. house of represent

mr. stewart of utah -- i inform the house that mr. stewart and mr.urtis will vote yes on the motion to recommit. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new jersey seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. row channa of california, the member will vote no on the motion to recommit. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from colorado seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mrs. porter, mr. castro, ms. pressley, mr. allred and mre members will vote no on the motion to recommit. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from tennessee seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. comer of kentucky, i inform the house that mr. comer will vote y emp a on the motion to recommit. thank you. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from utah seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mrs. herrera beutler of washington, i inform the house that she will vote yes on the motion to recommit. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the ge

mr. van tatenhoft, stewart rhodes implored president trump to invoke the insurrection act, the law that allows the president to put up malitias to put down a rebellion against the united states. i want your thoughts about this in your prior relationship with stewart rhodes. i understand that you had conversations with rhodes about the insurrection act. why was he so fixated on that and what did he think it would enable the oath keepers to do? >> well. >> i think it gave him a sense of legitimacy that it was a path forward to move forward with his goals and agendas. i think we need to quit mincing words and just talk about truths and what it was going to be was an armed revolution. people died that day. law enforcement officers died this day. there was a gallos set up in front of the capitol. this could have been the spark that started a new civil war. no one would have won there. that would have been good for no one. he was always looking for ways to legitimize what he was doing, whether be wrapping it in the trappings of it's not a malitia. we're not a malitia. we're an educational outreach g

mr. van tatenhove is an artist and a journalist. he is a former spokesman of the oath keepers and a former carlos associate of elmer stewart rose the founder and president of the oath keepers who has been charged with said ishes conspiracy in relationship with the follow attack. mr. van tatenhove broke with the oath keepers and has since spoken out forcefully against the violent group. he is a former supporter of president trump. he answered the president's call to come to washington, d.c. on january 6th. he marched to the capitol on the president's orders. he pleaded guilty last month to disorderly and disruptive conduct at the capitol. mr. airs who no longer supports president trump came forward voluntarily to share his story as a warming. i will now swear in our witnesses. the witnesses will please stand and raise their right hand. do you square or affirm under penalty of perjury that the testimony you're about to give is the truth the whole truth and thog but the truth so help you god? thank you you may be seated. let the record threk that the witnesses answered in the affirmative. i recognize myself for questions. today we've d

keepers, stewart rhodes, the guy with the eye patch from the gun handling accident, stewart rhodes apparently lived in mr. tatenhof's basement for eight months. jason van tatenhof in half now does a park asked about local politics in colorado where he lives now. it's kind of amazing to hear him on his podcast straight-up relaying the most recent news about january 6th and the investigation and the criminal charges against these paramilitary groups, and then while he's just doing his normal news podcast he has to mention kind of like as a fair disclosure to his listeners that, oh yeah, that news that we're doing right here, he used to live in my basement. >> the new indictment now is the second time that a far-right group has been charged, as i said. in january, stewart rhodes, leader and founder and previous basement roommate of mine -- he lived in my basement for about eight months -- was arrested and charged along with ten others in the same crime. >> previous basement roommate of mine. so this guy has a unique perspective right? the skies had unique access to these groups which are an important part o

mr. van tatenhove is an artist in journalist, he's a former spokesman of the oath keepers and a former close associate of stewart rhodes, the founder and president of the oath keepers, who has been charged with seditious conspiracy in relation to the capitol attack. mr. van tatenhove broke with the oath keepers and has since spoken out forcefully about the violent group. mr. errors is a former supporter of president trump, he answered the president called to go to washington d.c. on january 6th. we march to the capital on the presidents orders, he pleaded guilty last month to disorderly and disruptive conduct at the capitol. mr. ayres, who no longer supports president trump, came forward voluntarily to share his story as a warning. i will now swear in our witnesses. the witnesses will please stand and raise the right hand. do you swear or affirm -- under penalty of perjury, that the testimony you're about to give is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you god? thank you, you may be seated. let the record reflect that the witnesses answered in the affirmative. i recognize myself for que

mr. jason van tatenhove and stephen ayres , van tatenhove is artist and journalist, former spokesman of the oath keepers and former close associate of homer stewart founder and president of oath keepers who have been charged with seditious conspiracy in relation to the capitol attack. mr. van tatenhove broke with the oath keepers and has since spoken out against the violent group. mr. ayres is former supporter president trump. he answered the president's call to come to washington, d.c. on january six. he marched to the capitol on the president's orders, he pleaded guilty last month to disorderly and disruptive conduct at the capitol. mr. ayres, no longer supports president trump, came forward voluntarily to share his story as a warning. i will now swear in our witnesses. witnesses will please stand and raise their right hand. do you swear under penalty of perjury that the testimony you are about to give is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth so help you god? thank you. you may be seated. let the record reflect the witnesses answered in the affirmative. i recognize myself for questions. today, we discussed how president trump su

mr. ragsdale. where are you? and the fifth and last finalist for the 2022 george washington prize david o stewart's george washington the political rise of america's founding father. this new biography focuses on washington's life as a politician seen through the people and circumstances that shaped him. david stewart brings to the book both a master narrator's sense of story and a scholar's eye for detail. as stuart writes the middle-aged washington who took command of the continental army was almost unrecognizable compared to the young military officer of two decades before. stewart shows us how that inexperienced soldier grew up to become the general and president who so ably led his country in war and in peace. he also depicts the darker side of washington's power as an enslaver here at mount vernon. past writers have sometimes portrayed washington as a reluctant leader. stewart's book depicts an ambitious and savvy politician a person who's finesse at the delicate craft of statesmanship statesmanship has too often gone unrecognized. and that's it drumroll, please. and the winner is the winner of the 22 george w

stewart rhodes. we know that from last week that the white house top aides from pence marc short and mr. jacobs were both interviewed as well. that is all bearing fruit. now the question is, does the department have the goods right now? do they need more? do they try to flip a chinese man or dreadfully clark or mark meadows? none of these are guys who are particularly known for being particularly strong or stable so they all may be targets. the other big question is what is the justice department going to bring former vice president mike pence before a grand jury? i think they have to. i'd be very curious about andrew weizmann's views on, up to me that's part of the story. pence's aides have heard the story, but i think everybody should hear from him himself. >> that's a good point, because the grand jury is a totally different appointment from the -- it's 100 percent private. the vice president's testimony is absolutely secret and can only be revealed in a later court proceeding, whether might be a statement from the grand jury that is quoted. and so, there is no spectacle aspect to it,

mr. jason v van patteand a close associate ma stewart rhodes, the founder and president of oath keepers wholent group. mr. hairs is a former supporter of president trump. he answered the president's call to come to washington, d.c. on january 6th. he marched to the capitol on the president's orders, he pleaded guilty last month to disorderly and disruptive conduct at the capitol. mr. ayers who no longer supports president trump came forward voluntarily to share his story as a warning. i will now swear in our witnesses, the witnesses will please stand and raise their right hand. do you swear or affirm on the penalty of perjury that the testimony you are about to give is the truth, the whole truth and nothing butt t the truth so help you god. thank you, you may be seated. let the record reflect that the witnesses answered in the affirmative. i recognize myself for questions. today we've discussed how president trump summoned an angry mob of supporters to washington, d.c., many of whom came prepared to do battle against police and politicians alike. we're fortunate enough to be joined by two w

attorney, elmer stewart rhodes will only sit down with the committee for testimony if they agreed to do it during a live public hearing that is carried on tv. network tv, not just c-span. mr. roads, have you ever heard the phrase, beggars can't beat users? well, considering you are currently locked up and waiting to face trial for seditious conspiracy charges, i think it applies here. the committee's next hearing, scheduled for tuesday afternoon next week, is expected to focus on the connections between trump world and the extremist groups that led the charge on the capitol. committee member jamie raskin tells politico, quote, our investigation shows that there was a tremendous convergence of interests between the domestic violent extremist groups and the broader maga movement. this hearing will be the moment when one sees both the convergence of efforts at a political coup with the insurrectionary mob violence. we see how these two streams of activity become one. the committee gave us something of a preview of that connection during their last hearing. >> the white house continue to receive updates about planned demonstrations, including information regarding the proud b

stewart on the stand but couldn't track him down. so now, in closing, he didn't offer a detailed theory about what happened to michelle. didn't have to. >> i'm asking the court to find mrd a reasonable doubt that he committed this offense. >> four trials and now it was all on the line. and so d.a. kirk martin came on strong. that whole defense theory, he told the judge, was a fantasy. >> there's no evidence stacy stewart had any sort of relationship with michelle, let alone any reason or motive to harm one hair on her head. >> finally, said the d.a., after so many years, so many trials, it was time to convict cal harris once and for all. >> michelle died at the hands of her husband, the defendant, calvin harris. >> so what would the judge do? >> we presented the evidence about what we think happened. >> the judge was terse. the verdict brief with no explanation. just two words. words cal harris and his children had waited 15 years to hear. not guilty. >> when he came back with a not guilty, i was shocked. i was truly shocked. >> shocked. overjoyed. and saddened by what he had lost. >> best years of my life as a parent. i'll never get those years back. >> he will also n

stewart, curtis, i inform the house that they will vote nay on the rule. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from maryland rise? mr. trone: madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. boyle, mr. ruppersberger, mrs. trahan, mr. mceachin, ms. newman, mr. jones, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on house res. 1302. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from south carolina rise? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. donalds of florida, i inform the house that mr. donalds will vote nay on the rule. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas rise? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. babin of texas, i inform the house that mr. babin will vote no on the rule. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from florida rise? ms. salazar: as the member designated by mr. gimenez of florida, i inform the house that mr. gimenez will vote no on the previous question. thank you. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from south carolina rise? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. don

mr. president been in the meantime have a happy fourth and make sure the white house intern who posted this to eat registers for econ 101 for the fall semester because tim stewartnd market forces, supply and demand for what the president's fossil fuel policies are doing to the country. here is. >> every week the industry itself has to deal with two things. when they have to deal with the president who will stand up and say one thing while his bureaucracy is actively doing the other opposite of that. the second thing we have to be prepared to deal with his every 2-3 days to blame shift from whether it be russia, the industry, retail gas station owners. so that's what we have to deal with. really on a week to week basis. >> such a lack of empathy on the part of this administration. i talked about this a lead yesterday when i was on "fox & friends." it's unbelievable to me, the blame is a slap in the face. but also should mostly have no intention of changing their policies. one fixed income struggle even more, that are making parents make very difficult decisions about their children what they can afford. can i afford school? can i afford school clothes? because e