mr. strickland released? >> before this all passed and it just passed in missouri on august 28th of this year. before that passed, a local prosecutor like myself had been in office for a while. i have a good idea of how to evaluate a homicide case. that is what i do for a living. but i had no ability to correct an old homicide case out of my own office. the county of ambition. so i was powerless before august the 28. so now we have this law that allows me to bring the claim, and prove it before a judge. >> you did that. the governor has not pardon mr. strickland, and in fact the internees general challenge due in court. it seems weird. why is that happening? what is behind that? >> i don't know how to explain that. i'll probably have to have years behind these to better understand why someone with the same duty that i have, the same oath that i have, the same prosecutorial obligations that i have. governed by the apa. both of us are as lawyers. but state lawyers we have all those same qualities but only one o

mr. strickland's existence. so i can't even fathom how he must feel and how he's managed to keep his spirit and his heart the way he has presented himself to me, as a really gracious man. >> yeah, he had a bit of a smile in one of the pictures i saw today when he walked out, and i was thinking, that's something after 42 years. thank you for the work you did on behalf of him and the work you did and the work others did with you to see him a free man now. jackson county prosecutor jean peters baker. thank you for your time tonight. >> thank you. >>> up here next tonight, contrary to what the beltway media may tell you, democrats may have a few things to be thankful for this thanksgiving. i'll explain when we come back. i'll explain when we come back >>> if you are a democrat or someone who votes for democrats or just someone who would like today's pro-trump conspiracy-filled republican party not to take over congress next year, you may be having a hard time finding things to be thankful for this thanksgiving, at l

mr. strickland's existence.he must feel and how he's managed to keep his spirit and his heart the way he has presented himself to me, as a really gracious man. >> yeah, he had a bit of a smile in one of the pictures today when he walked out. that's something after 42 years. thank you for the work you did on behalf of him and the work you did and the work others did with you to see him a free man now. thank you for your time tonight. >> thank you. >>> up here next tonight, contrary to what the beltway media may tell you, democrats may have a few things to be thankful for this thanksgiving. i'll explain when we come back. g i'll explain when we come back the experts at safelite autoglass came right to me... with service i could trust. right, girl? >> singers: ♪ safelite repair, safelite replace. ♪ you've been taking mental health meds, and your mind is finally in a better place. except now you have uncontrollable body movements called tardive dyskinesia td. and it can seem like that's all people see. ♪ some meds f

mr. strickland's case, what was most interesting the victim knew mr. strickland.im. gave two other names. that actually shows that it wasn't him. that's exculpatory evidence. she only made an identification later after other people came to him and said, doesn't he hang out with those other people? that's what we know, that suggestive nature changes the way our memory looks at things. to hear the prosecutor say they wouldn't charge that case today. >> why such a challenge to right the wrongs in a case like this? >> i think that's a great question we hope those who fight it have to answer. i think unfortunately in missouri the tomorrow's office had a history of fighting every innocence case in the last 30 years. mr. strickland's was no different. but i think the large amount of attention that has been made to what mr. strickland has experienced, particularly for the amount of time that you had to go through it is bringing this to light to the rest of the folks who get to decide who we elect to side what justice is. what is that, that we want that to look like? why i

mr. strickland, i am profoundly sorry. i am profoundly sorry for the harm that has come to you. >> since that remarkable public statement, prosecutor jane peters baker who you saw there, she has been trying to fix this. we interviewed her here on the show and she told us she would fight until this was fixed. s again, the republican governor in the state could easily fix this.ta he could pardon mr. strickland, commute his sentence but he refused to do anything to fix what had gone wrong here.to and so jane peters baker, among others, advocated for a new law in missouri which just, in fact, went into effect this august. that new law lets prosecutors like herself file motions in court so a judge can fix wrongful convictions like this one. l well, it finally worked today. after 42 years and 4 months in prisons, one of the longest times served in u.s. history in what is known to be a wrongful conviction, today kevin strickland went free. the judge ruled today, the court's confidence in strickland's conviction is so undermined t

mr. strickland, i am profoundly sorry for the harm that has come to you. >> reporter: but at the time, missouri law prevented her from being able to release him or bring his case before a judge. >> let's just call it what it is. this is wrong. >> reporter: strickland's first exoneration hearing was held two weeks ago after a new law passed in august allowing baker to file a petition on his behalf. his brother tells the "kansas city star", that he cannot wait to see him to say "welcome home, brother". now free, he finally gets the chance to fulfill one life-long wish. >> you know, i've never been on a beach. i want to go out far in the ocean where you can't see any land in any direction. not just go out there but get in that water. >> our thanks to linsey davis. strickland said he never thought this day would come. >>> listen very closely, on this morning before thanksgiving, consider this your annual warning about deep frying your turkey. please be careful. you deep fryers out there. your frying attempt could easily become a flaming disaster as demonstrated by the fresno, california fire depart

mr. strickland deserves compensation after 42 years behind bars? sec. psaki: obviously, the case of mr. strickland is something that we all watched closely. i don't have any further comment from the u.s. government on discussions with the state. i will see if there's anything more we can add. reporter: on the common summit for democracy, how is the president planning to approach the leaders and how or what are his specific actions or commitments to the leaders? and if you can give us more details on the summit? sec. psaki: sure. so the summit for democracy is coming up on december 9th through 10th. it will convene a group of governmental and nongovernmental leaders to set forth an affirmative agenda for democratic renewal around the world. it will bring together 110 governments representing diverse democratic experiences around the world. as well as civil society and private sector leaders. this is an opportunity for leaders to discuss the challenges and opportunities facing democratic governments and how democracies can deliver for their citizens. based on the summit pillars of strength

mr. strickland is out and should have never been in jail in the first place, ali.u had a wonderful thanksgiving. i was in makeup trying to watch your show and get my makeup done, and the makeup artists are displeased with you because i was trying to have one eye on the screen and listen to your wonderful show. let me tell you a little bit on what's coming up on the cross connection. it continues into an abyss of shock and awe and lauren boebert implied that a fellow member of congress, ali. this is so disgusting. congresswoman boebert implied she was a terrorist. what was sad about this it wasn't the party, and it was the laughter and applause that came after and it's the 75+ million people when voted for someone who feeds into the baser instincts of this party and it's disgusting, really. my panel and i will dive into what that rhetoric is doing for the country, plus advice we can all use, relax, relate, release. that advice came from tony, and emmy award-winning debbie allen. world aids day is wednesday and that's a topic as we deal with one pandemic, we still ha

mr. strickland didn't get to be with his mother when she passed. >> something i think that is going to stuns for people who have been wrongly convicted. i want to highlight the go fund me page for kevin and we're going to go ahead and tweet this out, because i know a lot of people are going to be touched by this story. but, kevin, i understand that you want to see the ocean. >> yeah. yeah. that would be a big win. yeah. i think anybody that's alive should want to see the ocean before they pass, one time in life. yes, that's a big deal with me. >> can you tell us why? >> i just want to get in it. yeah. >> and what else? and what else, kevin? >> i lost my hearing. >> why would you like to see that? >> well, i mean, i was -- as a teenager, i was big on swimming. i always liked the water. and, you know, god created a big deal there when he put all that water out there and i need to get out there and see if i can ride a great white or something like that. but, yeah, that's, you know, the experience, i want to feel the power of the water. you know? at 62, i believe i can surf. if they get me out

mr. strickland. that is how long it has taken this attorneys general's office and those that came before them to talk to a single witness or victim. >> that is the kevin strickland case in missouri. he has always maintained his innocence. he has been in prison for 43 years. the prosecutors now say he did not do it. the state's attorney general nevertheless fighting to keep him in prison. it's another one of these incredible human dramas unfolding alongside all these other very high profile court cases this week. that's i think in part why the news has been pretty intense today. some of the political news this week and today has also been based in the courtroom as expected after a federal judge ruled last night that president trump's white house record must be handed over to the january 6th investigation. trump has now appealed that ruling from last night. it seems likely that this case may go all the way to the supreme court, one of the only matters of suspense here is how fast it will go. today the j

strickland will vote yea on h.r. 1917. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from maryland seek recognition? mr. raskin: as the member designated by mr. doggett of texas, i inform the house that mr. doggett will vote aye on h.r. 1917. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlelady from illinois seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. rush, i inform the house that mr. rush will vote yes on h.r. 1917. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. cawthorn of north carolina, i inform the house that mr. cawthorn will vote yes on h.r. 1917. as the member designated by mr. babin from the great state of texas, i inform the house that mr. babin will vote yes on h.r. 1917. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from north carolina seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. long of missouri, i inform the house that mr. long will vote aye on h.r. 1917. the speaker pro tempore: on this vote the yeas are 409, the nays are 16. 2/3 being in the

mr strickland, who's 62, said he had no hard feelings against the woman. which brought together white nationalists, white supremacists and neo—nazis, were responsible for the violence. our north america correspondent peter bowes reports. the violent clashes in charlottesville were a defining moment in recent american history. the unite the right rally was planned as a protest against the removal of statues of confederate leaders from the us civil war. it began with a march by neo—nazis and white supremacists. it ended the next day in violence. this incident led to the death of one woman when a far—right member drove into counter protesters. at least 19 others were injured. the lawsuit was brought against organisers of the rally by nine people who suffered physical or emotional injuries during the demonstrations. they allege that the defendants conspired to plan, promote and carry out the violent events carrying semiautomatic weapons, pistols, mace, armour shields and torches. the defendants said they acted in self—defence and that the police bore responsib

mr. boyle will vote no. as the member designated by congresswoman strickland, i inform the house that congresswoman strickland will vote no on the motion to recommit. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from indiana seek recognition? mrs.walorski: as the member designated by mr. reed of new york, i inform the house that mr. reed will vote yes on motion to recommit. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from minnesota seek recognition? >> as the member designated by roybal-allard i inform the house that ms. roybal-allard will vote no on the motion to recommit. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. gonzalez of texas, i inform the house that mr. gonzalez will vote yes on the motion to recommit the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from rhode island seek recognition? mr. cicilline: as the member designated by p ms. sewell of alabama with the longest constitution in the world, i inform the house that ms. sewell will vote no. >> as the member designated by

strickland will vote yea on h.r. 1975. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by representative smucker of pennsylvania, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that representative smucker will vote yes on h.r. 1975. thank you. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. lawson, i inform the house that mr. lawson will vote yes on h.r. 1975. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from missouri seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by ms. sharice davis, i inform the house that ms. davis will vote yes on h.r. 1975. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from virginia seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. cohen, i inform the house that mr. cohen will vote yes on h.r. # 1975. as the member designated by mr. trone, i inform the house that mr. trone will vote yes on h.r. 1975. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from fl

mr. jeffries: as the member designated by congresswoman strickland, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that congresswoman strickland will vote yea on s.1064. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from massachusetts seek recognition? ms. clark: as the member designated ms. frankel, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that ms. frankel will vote yes on s.1064. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from michigan seek lech nation -- seek recognition? >> as the member designated mr. bowman, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. bowman will vote no on s.1064. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new jersey seek recognition? mr. pallone: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. sires, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. sires will vote yes on s.1064. as the member designated by mr. donald payne, i inform the house that mr. payne will vote yes on s.1064. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from michigan seek recognition? ms. talib: as the member designated

i inform the house that congresswoman strickland will vote yes. >> as the member designated by mr. hag dorn, i inform the house that mr. hagedorn will vote no. >> as the member designated by mr. sires, i inform the house that mr. sires will vote yes on h. res. 803. as the member designated by mr. donald payne will vote yes. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from florida seek recognition? >> as the member designated by ms. salazar, mr. buchanan, i inform the house that mr. ms. salazar and mr. mast will vote no on the rule. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from hawaii seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. moulton, i inform the house that mr. moulton will vote yes. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does michigan seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mrs. harshbarger. mr. speaker, as mr. long of missouri, i inform the house that mr. long will vote no on the rule. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from maryland seek recognition? mr. raskin: as the member designated by mr.

strickland will vote yes on h.res. 774. as the member designated by ms. meng, i inform the house that ms. meng will vote yes on h.res. 774. as the member designated by mrs. axne, i inform the house that mrs. axne will vote yes on h.res. 774. as the member designated by mrs. maloney, i inform the house that mrs. maloney will vote yes on h.res. 774. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from tennessee seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. desjarlais of tennessee, i inform the house that mr. desjarlais will vote nay on the rule. mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. comer of kentucky, i inform the house that mr. comer will vote nay on the rule. thank you. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. lawson, i inform the house that mr. lawson will vote yes on h. resolution 774. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from west virginia seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. baird of indiana, i inform the house that mr. baird will vote nay on the rule. the speaker pro

strickland that 50% of one race is required, whether 50% of multiraces are required is something i think the court will vote sometime in the next few years. mr. braden: i think jeff is exactly right. there's something of a circuit spit on this issue. i hope and expect, maybe more hope than expect, never know, me predicting with the supreme -- what the supreme court will do has not necessarily been something i would have won a lot of money on. but i think given the circumstance, this is an issue we hope the supreme court will address sooner rather than later for all of us advising line drawers. prof. wice: they are debating whether coalition districts are required. democrats are for that, republicans are against that. not that they're against it in principle, but that you could create those districts but aren't required to create the districts. maya: how do you show that all minority groups are cohesive? do you rely on primary election results? general election rules? ok, both of you say both. mr. braden: you have to use both to get there. it's hard to identify a candidate of choice simply looking at general election data because i can tell y

strickland will vote yes on consideration of the resolution. as the member designated by mrs. axne, i inform the house that mrs. axne will vote yes on consideration of the resolution. as the member designated by ms. frankel, i inform the house that ms. frankel will vote yes on the consideration of the resolution. as the member designated by mrs. maloney, i inform the house that mrs. maloney will vote yes on the consideration of the resolution. as the member designated by ms. meng, i inform the house that ms. meng will vote yes on consideration of the resolution. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlelady from virginia rise? >> as the member designated by mr. krishna moor thee -- mr. krishnamoorthi, i inform the house that mr. krishnamoorthi will vote yes on consideration of the resolution. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from virginia seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. yarmuth of kentucky, i inform the house that mr. yarmuth will vote yes on the resolution. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gent