mr. sweeney? he still gave you a notice of violation. >> this is after the notice of violation. >> did he it -- did he detracted? >> we went through the items. on the windows he said he did not have an argument because it was a planning issue. he said the building exempts taking glass from a window. we did not remove the wood window frame. he said it may be of planning issue because it is a historic building. we get back to this law, which is the state law willie brown past years ago. i understand the frustration of the community. i am a catholic. i understand the tension going about my school. i understand the frustration, but i think we need to deal with facts. a lot of this is the law. whether it is a piece of furniture or the historic nature of this building, and we would love to have the dialogue with the city attorney and whoever else, because that is where this really belongs. we apologize for the upset this has caused, but i would really like to get this conversation back on target. you ne

mr. sweeney? deputy director? >> we are planning to issue a permit or deny a permit. giving the property owners a chance for the process to have their issues resolved prior to the issuance, and if they are not happy they can go before the planning commission to voice their displeasure. >> our action? this action that we made a decision on? >> i asked whether or not it was recorded. >> i believe that he said it was. >> we have done all the weekend as members of the appeals board. >> it seems like the planning department has issued orders back in our department and the new permits are being reviewed. new applications for permits. >> it will not be out of planning for a while. >> until at such time that it comes back into our department, we do not have authority over it. you are free to pursue the action of viewing the permit, essentially. and whenever you can do through the planning department. >> does everyone understand that? if there is no other discussion, we will close this item. >> a item -- item g is general public comment. >> seeing no one. >> ok. item h, adjour

mr. sweeney clearly stated that he would take the investigation. what needs to be done? you have to get the report from the developer. so, you have to do something about it. or you can move forward immediately. >> you have a pretend surveyor? >> correct. >> they have one. >> it is a partial. >> have you ever gotten together to compare? >> yes. they know exactly what it is. addressing the front, the back, the sides. the rest of it came from nowhere. they know that. >> you say that there is no communication there? [inaudible] ] ... [inaudible] jemaah >> -- a [inaudible] >> -- >> [inaudible] last year the order dated, september 25, you would allow appellants additional time for association of property line dispute and city planning departments. they have never tried to resolve the property with us. we would like to get them all resolved. so that we can move forward and they can move forward. i would also like to state that the front edition, painted plywood, has been like that for only two years. now it is deteriorating and should be inspected for electrical or funding issu

mr. sweeney clearly stated that he would take the investigation. what needs to be done? you have to get the report from the developer. so, you have to do something about it. or you can move forward immediately. >> you have a pretend surveyor? >> correct. >> they have one. >> it is a partial. >> have you ever gotten together to compare? >> yes. they know exactly what it is. addressing the front, the back, the sides. the rest of it came from nowhere. they know that. >> you say that there is no communication there? [inaudible] ] ... [inaudible] jemaah >> -- a [inaudible] >> -- >> [inaudible] last year the order dated, september 25, you would allow appellants additioti

mr. sweeney has said there in the process of training staff to do this quickl an easy process. that's a step in the right direction. commissioner hechanova. >> is there a connection to the department of real estate board ? what is then sent to the property owner of this address change so that any notification for future tax purposes will be consistent, that they receive the billing and/or tax requirement accordingly? >> i believe our permit data it is connected. as far as the department of real estate, they're dealing with city property. that's my understanding. unless the part of the city property is being changed. they would be the applicant. otherwise, they would be the office dealing with address changes. >> we do connect? >> i think they have our information regarding assessment record because any renovations would have to reassess the properties for property value. >> how about in the case of a changed address? do we notify the rent board? i'm not familiar enough to tell you about the process. >> that is one of the issues that gave rise to this, the fact that the history

mr. sweeney and i have a long conversation about this when he showed up but the notice of violation, that these are items sitting on the floor of the church. they are not part of the building. they are not like a wall or window in a wall. they are religious items. there is this question of separation of church and state. what is the city going to do with a marble top fed has a relic of a saint certified by relic of a saint certified by the vatican -- marble top th

mr. sweeney to know more about that, but as far as i know, that is considered a fixture. >> i was referring to the altar. >> he mentioned the glass being different, and that is why i want some clarification. >> you already closed public comment. i have no further speakers. i would be happy to provide closing comments. >> any questions or comments? >> no. >> any questions or comments? >> real quickly, i see that the spirit of the law was violated with regard to an agreement we had established with the megan furth academy based on a conversation i had with fred and because of the number of meetings i had looking for their support of the expansion plans, by the expansion plans were predicated on a strong community component that there would been retention so there would be an ongoing interface between community and the church itself. those plans were never aborted. and we were never informed there was going to be any interruption of those plans whatsoever. i believe the letter of the law has been violated as well based on thorough testimony by the department of building inspection, where there

mr. sweeney and i have a long co

mr. sweeney and i have a long conversation about this when he showed up but the notice of violation, that these are items sitting on the floor of the church. they are not part of the

mr. sweeney. >> good afternoon, supervisors. what was your question again? supervisor chiu: part of the language of the resolution calls on the city attorney to investigate, publicly report on, and take action on violations of laws. this sounds similar to our code enforcement process, which would take place, i would imagine, in an instance where there are major violations that take place, and i wondered if you could reflect on, from the standpoint of the building inspector and's point of view, if there is an effort by the institution to come under greater compliance or ameliorate some of their issues, that this could be pursued for code enforcement? >> yes, there was a violation. the violation was that they should have obtained a building permit to remove the finishes. the altars, the pews -- anything that is nailed in place becomes a fixture. to remove that, you need a permit. it becomes something like a kitchen remodel. when you take out your cabinets, you need a building permit. >> in that case, the cabinets were viewed as being significant? is that a cas